Indian Navy Discussions and Updates

Eeshaan

New Member
Thanks for the info, Dragonfire. I had no idea that India is developing it's own indegenous 5th gen LO fighter to complement the T-50. Quite interesting indeed.
 

Twinblade

Member
AMCA ? I'm not aware of that project. Can you please elaborate a bit on it ? What does AMCA stand for & what is being developed under this project ?
AMCA project aims to deliver a LO fighter with a MTOW of 20 tons (think of a LO f-16 but with two 90KN engines instead of one 130KN engine), broadly similar to the Japanese ATD-X Shinshin. Aims are realistic in terms of weight & thrust, considering they initially planned LCA to be 5.5 tons but over engineered the airframe to avoid any newbie mistakes. LCA mk2 is supposed to be 6 tons as compared to Gripen NG at 7.2 tons, so IMO they might be able to keep it close to 8-8.5 tons, similar to f-16.
Also planned are AESA radar, uprated 90-95KN Kaveri engine ( which even in its current form should be able to give this baby a nasty thrust weight ratio). Right now this is all the info available in public domain.
 

Rish

New Member
hey did anyone else catch this and have any details on it?

During the quarter, PDOECL signed an MoU with Babcock Group (UK) which will assist the Company in the creation, construction and development of next generation aircraft carriers. Another significant development was the name change of Pipavav Shipyard Ltd. to Pipavav Defence & Offshore Engineering Company Ltd. The name change marks the vision of the Company to enter into other defence segments including the Indian Army and aerospace technology as well as capture greater opportunities in defence and offshore heavy engineering.
Print News: Pipavav Defence and Offshore Engineering
 

designeraccd

New Member
What is the current status of both the Indian carrier construction program, and the x-Gorshkov? Any photos?

I find the design of the Indian carrier, with the X'd flight deck, to be very interesting as a way to potentially increase the number of sorties on a relatively "small" carrier. DFO :D
 

Twinblade

Member
What is the current status of both the Indian carrier construction program, and the x-Gorshkov? Any photos?

I find the design of the Indian carrier, with the X'd flight deck, to be very interesting as a way to potentially increase the number of sorties on a relatively "small" carrier. DFO :D
Gorshkov set to hit sea maybe till end of this year and the IAC by middle of next year.
 

GelbOne

New Member
I think it's pretty amazing how the Indian MoD can afford refurbishing one carrier, building another from scratch, updating the MiG-29 fleets, co-developing the Sukhoi/HAL PAK-FA/FGFA, AND hosting the MMRCA competition
 

StevoJH

The Bunker Group
I think it's pretty amazing how the Indian MoD can afford refurbishing one carrier, building another from scratch, updating the MiG-29 fleets, co-developing the Sukhoi/HAL PAK-FA/FGFA, AND hosting the MMRCA competition
MMRCA seems to have been going on forever, so who knows if they actually *can* afford it. The ex-Russian carrier hasnt really been that expensive and the cost has been spread over many years. Not sure how much the Mig-29 fleet purchases have cost, but it would probably be quite considerable.

As for PAK-FA, has the actual % share/R&D contribution of India ever been released?
 

GelbOne

New Member
MMRCA seems to have been going on forever, so who knows if they actually *can* afford it. The ex-Russian carrier hasnt really been that expensive and the cost has been spread over many years. Not sure how much the Mig-29 fleet purchases have cost, but it would probably be quite considerable.

As for PAK-FA, has the actual % share/R&D contribution of India ever been released?
I recently returned from a trip to India and I have no doubts that they would have trouble financing the projects.

well, Pogosyan (directer of Sukhoi DB) said that tech, intellectual property, and design is 50-50. Then, the HAL director said that India was working on the composites, avionics, and cockpit systems, as well as flight software etc.
 

designeraccd

New Member
"The ex-Russian carrier hasnt really been that expensive" Oh? The last figures I saw were an estimate of over 2.3 BILLION dollars for that "FREE" carrier. To my limited wallet, that's one expensive free carrier! Plus cost of aircraft, etc.

Obviously the Indians are embarked on a very large military buildup. I wonder how much more impetus they will have now that the PLAN has their one CV at least moving?? DFO ;)
 

T.C.P

Well-Known Member
"The ex-Russian carrier hasnt really been that expensive" Oh? The last figures I saw were an estimate of over 2.3 BILLION dollars for that "FREE" carrier. To my limited wallet, that's one expensive free carrier! Plus cost of aircraft, etc.

Obviously the Indians are embarked on a very large military buildup. I wonder how much more impetus they will have now that the PLAN has their one CV at least moving?? DFO ;)
The PLAN's CV was going to move sooner or later and India I am pretty sure were prepared for that eventuality, they will proceed on with their carrier plan and will hope to remain one step ahead of the Chinese in this area.
 

designeraccd

New Member
Given the use they have gotten out of the x-HMS Hermes; one could say they definately have recieved their money's worth! Given the "checkered" history of the 4 Kievs in the Soviet Navy; good luck.

Learning how to operate the high performance SU33 is going to be another BIG step in their naval aviation program, from the IAC's or x-Gorshkov. DFO ;)
 

wormhole

New Member
well, even with ONE carrier, the Indians are already ahead, seeing as they do have a carrier support fleet and tenders.
Plus they have the advantage of geography. There's a reason its called the Indian Ocean and they really aren't interested in what goes on in the South China Sea. Both bodies of water are of strategic concern to China.
 

Twinblade

Member
I recently returned from a trip to India and I have no doubts that they would have trouble financing the projects.

well, Pogosyan (directer of Sukhoi DB) said that tech, intellectual property, and design is 50-50. Then, the HAL director said that India was working on the composites, avionics, and cockpit systems, as well as flight software etc.
4 and half wars, 4 decades of non stop insurgencies in the last 64 years, ultra nationalist electorate and countless other reasons will insure that the defence spending does not fall, besides low wages allow them to spend a larger share on equipment as compared to other countries. Furthermore an 8-9% growth in the GDP allows them to maintain a healthy annual increase in spending.
 

StevoJH

The Bunker Group
"The ex-Russian carrier hasnt really been that expensive" Oh? The last figures I saw were an estimate of over 2.3 BILLION dollars for that "FREE" carrier. To my limited wallet, that's one expensive free carrier! Plus cost of aircraft, etc.
Fairly sure the MIG's were included in the price, but even if they werent, 2.3 Billion is still half the price of a new carrier of similar size like the Queen Elizabeth class.

well, even with ONE carrier, the Indians are already ahead, seeing as they do have a carrier support fleet and tenders.
The Indians are well ahead, they have developed doctrine and fully trained and experienced pilots. However, the PLAN also have support ships, so you cannot use that as an example of Indian superiority, if anything I wouldn't be surprised if the Chinese support ships were actually newer and in better condition.
 

StevoJH

The Bunker Group
ultranationalist?
are you insinuating that the Indian government is some sort of neo-Fascist movement?
:confused:
That is not what he said, he said ultranationalist 'electorate', aka. the population.

Ultranationalism | Define Ultranationalism at Dictionary.com
ul·tra·na·tion·al·ism   /ˌʌltrəˈnæʃənlˌɪzəm/ Show Spelled[uhl-truh-nash-uh-nl-iz-uhm] Show IPA
noun
extreme devotion to or advocacy of the interests of a nation, especially regardless of the effect on any other nations.
Fascist is not a synonym of Ultranationalist.

A synonym of Nationalist *is* Patriot though.
 

Twinblade

Member
so, do you think India will use the KASHTAN CIWS system on its indigenous carriers?
Most likely, yes. They are installed on [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talwar_class_frigate"]Talwar class frigate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:INS_Talwar.jpg" class="image" title="INS Talwar"><img alt="INS Talwar" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/06/INS_Talwar.jpg/300px-INS_Talwar.jpg"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/0/06/INS_Talwar.jpg/300px-INS_Talwar.jpg[/ame] class frigates as well.
 

swerve

Super Moderator
Fairly sure the MIG's were included in the price, but even if they werent, 2.3 Billion is still half the price of a new carrier of similar size like the Queen Elizabeth class.
Similar size? 50% greater displacement.

Cavour was 1.4 billion Euros, & is as similar in size to ex-Gorshkov as a QE is.
 

GelbOne

New Member
Most likely, yes. They are installed on class frigates as well.
true true, but right now only 4 Otobreda 76mm guns have been confirmed, which is kinda surprising because they have a relatively slow RTF when compared to the PHALANX or other Gatling-based point defense systems.
 

shag

New Member
Similar size? 50% greater displacement.

Cavour was 1.4 billion Euros, & is as similar in size to ex-Gorshkov as a QE is.
btw Migs were never included in the price to begin with. The Spanking new Ks would never have come free like the carrier was supposed to(initially)
 
Top