As far as I recall they were talking about the Mig-29K destined for India. Basically they said something like "If they are not paying (for the increased carrier refit costs), we can just as well induct the Migs on our own carrier". Just part of the theatrics around the Gorshkov-deal and not to be taken too serious, I suppose.read that the russian MoD considers buying the MiG-29K for the Navy, albeit I think they will ultimately spent the money on upgrading the Su-27K.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNVF3ZzdMX8"]Mig 29K on the carrier[/ame]Scorpion about airframe no154 - totally right. But as I was saidthey took only airframe and made some changes in it. The explanation of such choice was easy - lack of money when the project started in the end of 90s, designers decided that there is no need in absolutely new airframe.
And I've searched for info about MiG-29K for RuNAVY - njthing found, if you have links then please post them
I posted the video as you had asked for a link on Mig-29K info. I agree that the Su-33 won over the Mig-29K as it best served RuN requirements for carrier aviation.Salty Dog and what do you want to say by this video?? that MiG-29K was tested on Kuznetsov or what?
If first - then yes. The prototype was biult in the middle of 80s but lost to Su-33. But somebody decided to have a lighter AC on the carrier and it was decided to produce also MiG-29K. But MiG-29K was not really produced serially until India's order. There were only test AC. Also on Kuznetsov there is Su-25UTG - only one test and training AC
I have my doubts the ex-Gorshkov is able to operate with the Su-33 due to weight limitations. The Kiev class operated the Yak-38 which was about 11,300 kg. The Mig-29K is about 18,550 kg and the Su-33 29,940 kg. Those are considerable weight differences and would require structural changes to accommodate the increased weight especially for arrested landing (where the flight deck takes additional stress from the "controlled crash" landing.)It can operate but only on the deck as I know. I mean Flanker can launch and land on Gorshkov but nothing more.
A while back their was a comment from an Indian Admiral or something say that the span of the Flanker made it very tight to launchI have my doubts the ex-Gorshkov is able to operate with the Su-33 due to weight limitations. The Kiev class operated the Yak-38 which was about 11,300 kg. The Mig-29K is about 18,550 kg and the Su-33 29,940 kg. Those are considerable weight differences and would require structural changes to accommodate the increased weight especially for arrested landing (where the flight deck takes additional stress from the "controlled crash" landing.)
I also read recently that Russia was going to order Mig-29K's. (can't remember the source. Yet, I'll see if I can find it?) Which, makes you wonder if Russia isn't trying to get the ex-Gorshkov back from India. As it has brand new Mig-29K's in production. Which, India paid for by the way! This in turn would give Russia two large Carriers with new fighters to operate from............
The original Mig-29K has little in common with today's Mig-29K that is being sold to India. Totally different animals.Nope..
The Su-33 will be replaced with the newer Mig-29K.
But when i don't know.
I don't think there has been signed any contract on between DoD & VVS Mig-29, but reports suggest there will be a contract in the near future.
Lenta.ru: Îðóæèå: Ìèíîáîðîíû êóïèò ïàëóáíûå èñòðåáèòåëè ÌèÃ-29Ê äëÿ "Àäìèðàëà Êóçíåöîâà"
Its in Russian.
The only reason why Su-33 was chosen over MiG-29K was Sukhoi political clout. MiG-29K had more modern (at that time) radar (N010), better ECM and RWR equipment, was compatible with R-77 and PGMs. Also, Su-27K/33 cannot take off with a full fuel load, therefore, Flanker's advantage in range and payload is questionable.
Thanks
Yet the current MiG-29K is still superior to the Su-33. The Su-33 would have to be modernized, and that would require at least some R&D. So there is some question of practicality. Though mostly it's once again politics.
:roll:Can hope for 10-15% PAKFA advantage over F-22 due to two decades of tech. development.
2) F-22 detects Su35 from the distance of 150-180 km but can open fire from 110 km, while becomes visible for Su-35's radar by itself and on R-77 range of attack.
3) OLS-35 probably detects Raptor on 100 km distance