I think the CBI investigations on the OFB matters are still ongoing - so it is interesting that ST Kinetics issued such a strong public response at this stage. IIRC, there was also a scandal in the previous Indian Bofors' artillery purchase. Can anyone remember what happened?
If you are interested, Wiki has a write up on the
Bofors scandal.
Where to begin... Scandals swirling around defence deals have ensured the Indian Army has not inducted any single new artillery gun for over 23 years. This would give you an idea that the Indian defence procurement system is not working as it should. Even
Indian reports acknowledge that the modernization of India’s armed forces is still a way off as it struggles to shake off “bureaucratic bungling, political wrangling and the more than a sniff of scandal that has characterized arms deals in the past.”
As I understand it (and I'm by no means an expert), all Indian defence acquisitions need to be processed by the Defense Procurement Board (DPB) and the DPB frowns upon single source procurement. The procurement for the first RfP should have been delayed once
BAE Systems withdrew its offer of their howitzer (as BAE refused to accept the initial tender requirement that the howitzer be able to use the existing 155mm ammunition in the Indian Army's artillery inventory). With the BAE pull out, the howitzer competition became a sole-source contract negotiations with ST Kinetics.
If DPB wanted procedural compliance to their processes,
I don't understand why the DPB did not stop the procurement process at that point to ask the Indian Ministry of Defence (MOD) issue a new RfP - which would have been acceptable to BAE but unacceptable for Indian Army logistics officers.
Instead, MOD proceeded to continue with the trails for ST Kinetics' Pegasus howitzer. And MOD did not inform ST Kinetics of the postponement of the trials for the guns until after the guns had been delivered in Mumbai.
I wonder why the Indian news reports seemed to be so blissfully unaware that MOD was not following it's own DPB processes for the howitzer tender.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) investigation of the former director-general of the Ordnance Factory Board (OFB) seems to be wholly unrelated to ST Kinetics. According to the article by
Ajai Shukla, the SAR-21 MMS carbine actually won in the police carbine trials (against the OFB-developed AMOGH). And the complaints that led to an investigation seems to a politically motivated attempt to scuttle the SAR21MMS carbine purchase following from the police carbine trials.
While I understand that CBI investigations are on-going, they have not yet attempted to make a prima facie case to link ST Kinetics in their investigations on the former OFB director. And it seems, from the statements thus far, CBI has not contacted ST Kinetics on the matter. If indeed there is a link, CBI should be contacting Singapore anti-corruption authorities (CPIB) to assist in their investigation. That also does not seem to have happened - as any CPIB investigation on ST Kinetics would be big news in Singapore. So I don't understand what is currently going on.
Maybe someone else who understands the Indian procurement system can comment and explain the situation to me.
As far as I am concerned the biggest losers in this saga are:
(i) the Indian police (considering they are still using antiquated rifles); and
(ii) the Indian Army (who has not been able to buy new howitzers for 23 years).
IMHO, the final score:
Indian bureaucracy - 2
Indian Army/Police -- 0