Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion Thread

swerve

Super Moderator
Urgh what?

I meant instead of giving tranche 3 aircraft to the Saudi's (and Oman if that's still on?) we should offer them tranche 1's for a slightly lower price. I didn't say anything about procuring extra aircraft.
The Saudis are not getting Tranche 3 aircraft. According to the published reports, they're getting 24 Tranche 2 aircraft ( RAF delivery slots relinquished to let the Saudis have early delivery, replaced by additional RAF orders to be delivered at the end of Tranche 2 - and that's all signed up for) plus 48 - with possible follow-up orders - to be assembled in Saudi Arabia. They want to build an assembly plant. Who are we to argue? The customer is always right. But it does rather get in the way of all these "T3 Typhoons for the Saudis" stories. Their authors never make clear the impact on the structure of the Saudi order, & often write in such a way that I suspect they don't even know it, which tends to undermine their credibility.
 

Scorpion82

New Member
Guys, how long do you estimate untill CAESAR radar reaches production lines?
CAESAR won't be produced at all as it was just a demonstration programme. The name of such an AESA system would be Captor-E and if the partner nations finally commit to an AESA system it should be ready by the time deliveries of T3A start around 2013.
 

Parmenion

New Member
CAESAR won't be produced at all as it was just a demonstration programme. The name of such an AESA system would be Captor-E and if the partner nations finally commit to an AESA system it should be ready by the time deliveries of T3A start around 2013.
I see, name does not matter as long as it is an AESA radar:D

I just hope it will be able to see within a decent distance the turkish F-35s...
 

Falstaff

New Member
Yeh saw that one yesterday.

Today we get the slightly more worrying:

Uk Eurofighter purchase in question
Hmm, I guess we'll have to wait until next week. Perhaps they'll sort something out. It seems clear however that the pull out option would be a very expensive one.

parmenion said:
I just hope it will be able to see within a decent distance the turkish F-35s...
Why? Are there any signs that Greece will renew its commitment to the Eurofighter? I don't think so, at least I haven't heard of anything.
 

METEORSWARM

New Member
Tecnology avanced day to day.

Today stealthy,tomorrow no less stealthy,in 8 years very less stealthy.

IS EVOLUTION DONT STOP
 

citizen578

New Member
Brown signs off tranche 3

Typhoon resolution is close
Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Prime Minister Gordon Brown is allegedly set to sign off on the third tranche of Eurofighter Typhoons in an effort to preserve jobs and Britain's reputation in defence procurement. But measures to limit production and through life costs are still under review.

In recent weeks the Treasury has stepped into the debate over the third tranche of Typhoons, deeming them unaffordable and seeking a cancellation on the deal. But the damage any cancellation would do to British industry and the people it employs appears to be too much for Brown to stomach.

While companies such as EADS and BAE may be able to withstand the cancellation of 88 Typhoons for Britain and 232 overall for the partnering countries, many of the smaller suppliers would likely face severe drops in revenue and possible administration.

The Business Secretary Lord Mandelson has intervened in recent days according to the Financial Times, pushing Brown and the Cabinet to sign off on the deal. He told colleagues on Tuesday that any cancellation or delay for the third tranche would result in Britain being viewed as an "unreliable partner."

In reality, the MoD and government face an impossible situation in which there will be no financial winners. If Britain requests more time to debate the third tranche, up to £500m could be added onto the cost of the order due to delays in ordering and making parts for the aircraft. Additional costs would also be sustained by Italy, Spain and Germany who are ordering the planes. This would strain relations with them and hurt Britain's place in Europe.

Cancelling the deal would cost at least £2bn in penalties and also damage Britain's relations in the EU and in the European defence sector.

Ordering the planes and then selling on 72 of them to Saudi Arabia would still cost the Treasury at least £1.4bn and put additional strains on the MoD's already depleted budget for this year.

Last month the partnering nations agreed to divide tranche 3 into two orders and reduce production costs.

Defence Management - Typhoon resolution is close
 

luca28

New Member
Large Question Mark Poised over UK’s Tranche 3 Eurofighter

Eurofighter nations waiting for tranche three go-ahead, while UK calculates cancellation option

07:08 GMT, May 13, 2009 defpro.com | Three Eurofighter nations -- Germany, Spain and Italy-- remain committed to buy their 3A “half share” in the final Tranche 3 order for the Eurofighter Typhoon programme and await a final British decision while London is weighing its options to pull out. Based on a preliminary agreement reached in March, the four nations agreed to split Tranch 3, as originally planned in two sub-tranches, and to place an order for the first 3A sub-tranche, including 112 fighters, worth nearly €8 billion. However, the Treasury and the Ministry of Defence are reportedly squabbling over the estimated €1.6 billion (£1.45 billion) cost of the 16 aircraft in the 3A semi-tranche that would be funded by the British taxpayer (the 3A contract is to include 40 aircraft for the UK, but 24 of these would be transferred to Saudi Arabia). It so happens that the Treasury maintains a veto of sorts for any procurement surpassing £400 million and this has effectively blocked the entire programme.

With interested parties in the UK and other partner nations now waiting for some sort of a signal from London, the pertinent question is whether the Treasury actually intends (or has no other options than, make your choice) to effectively torpedo a programme of immense significance in both operational and political terms – which would point at the British economy being in far worse conditions than optimistically assumed by some commentators – or rather the whole is but a form of a political gesticulation. For the costs of pulling out could be actually higher than acquiring the aircraft and paying for them.

Under the terms of the original “umbrella contract”, the UK has a commitment to purchase 88 Typhoons in Tranche 3, now to be split among 40 aircraft in Tranche 3A and the rest in a future 3B. The MoU between the four countries specifies that if a country withdraws unilaterally from the programme or reduces its order, it must compensate the other partners for the resulting higher costs they are facing. Indications are now beginning to circulate to the effect that a failure to sign for 3A would cost the UK € 2.2 billion (£2 billion) purely in compensation fees – not to mention the loss of work for employees of the British aerospace industry. The Eurofighter programme is estimated to finance more than 40,000 UK jobs, including at BAE Systems and hundreds of smaller suppliers.

In this context the Society of British Aerospace Companies (SBAC), UK’s aerospace, defence and security trade association, has warned that a decision against Tranche 3 will have far-reaching implications, not only on military capabilities but also on the “loss of some of Britain’s key technological capabilities,” as stated Ian Godden, SBAC Chief Executive on Monday. He further declared that “given the terms of the programme’s international agreements the decision for the Government is between acquiring military capability, retaining skilled people in the UK and jobs on the one hand or spending money to subsidise a ‘brain drain’ to Europe on the other.”

While Germany, Italy and Spain would be compensated for any British unilateral withdrawal, they see continued British participation in the programme as imperative both in political terms and as a continued support for the Typhoon’s technical and commercial progress. For this reason, their leaders are now putting significant pressure on Prime Minister Gordon Brown to intervene in favour of defence. Germany, in particular, will need a go-ahead for Tranche 3A before the end of June so it can authorise payments before national elections in September.
Source: defence.professionals | defpro.com
 

swerve

Super Moderator
Luca,

the link to that story has already been posted, it's already been discussed, & later news has already been posted & discussed. Keep up!
 

Firn

Active Member
Luca,

the link to that story has already been posted, it's already been discussed, & later news has already been posted & discussed. Keep up!
All in all not only the credibility of the UK among the European partners seems to be here at stake. Tranche 3 seems to be a very important step to transfrom the Eurofighter in a ture multi role fighter. Add that to the huge fines and the defense industry crying truth or wulf - I have a hard time to belive that this won't get through eventually. Perhaps it is to some extent show to demostrate that they are comitted to cutting or at least at trying.
 

ASFC

New Member
All in all not only the credibility of the UK among the European partners seems to be here at stake. Tranche 3 seems to be a very important step to transfrom the Eurofighter in a ture multi role fighter. Add that to the huge fines and the defense industry crying truth or wulf - I have a hard time to belive that this won't get through eventually. Perhaps it is to some extent show to demostrate that they are comitted to cutting or at least at trying.
The problem is that the press here in the UK are absolutely useless at reporting any Defence related news accurately-hence as Swerve has mentioned-when the UK Govt procrastinates on whether to order, and certain Middle East customers come along sniffing for fighters, they put 2 and 2 together and make 5 that the UK might cancel T3/and or sell them to ME customers. Which is crazy-why would the RAF and the MOD agree to giving up the most advanced variant of the Typhoon after all the money they have spent on the program!?!?
 

citizen578

New Member
I'm getting increasingly confused by all this. Has anything actually changed? Or is it just the case that the media's perception of it has changed?

So there was never any chance of the RAFs purchse beig diverted to Saudi, or was it the intention to withdraw only to find out that it costs more to withdraw than to conclude the purchase?

:unknown :confused: :unknown
 

Grim901

New Member
I'm getting increasingly confused by all this. Has anything actually changed? Or is it just the case that the media's perception of it has changed?

So there was never any chance of the RAFs purchse beig diverted to Saudi, or was it the intention to withdraw only to find out that it costs more to withdraw than to conclude the purchase?

:unknown :confused: :unknown
I think the govt. just reaffirmed its commitment to the program yesterday to show it wouldn't cut any aircraft. Only 24 were ever going to be diverted to Saudi Arabia, it just depended on which tranche they'd come from I think. The rest are being locally produced.

The Saudi aircraft being built are at tranche 2 standard, but i think we made up the numbers afterwards, so we'll get the the same number of tranche 2 for the UK, but fewer tranche 3, with more tranche 2 being built overall and the same number of tranche 3 as originally planned....I think, it's very confusing and unclear.
 

kato

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
"Affordable bid" ? That's a good one. The bid is: buy the aircraft or pay pretty much the same sum in fines. Simple as that.
 
Top