Investments in precision strike technology for unconventional warfare
1. To be ready for unconventional warfare (be it IEDs or Scuds or MLRS) and to meet evolving air threats, the SAF needs to invest in precision strike technology (to avoid blue on blue). The SAF when deployed, faces both conventional warfare and unconventional warfare threats.
2. As such, new technology and new doctrines are necessary to face new threats. Part of the RSAF's force modernization plans - is the move towards network centric warfare and an "Effects Based Operations" (EBO) theory of air warfare.
4. The conceptual change is to a non-linear view of battle, to enable the Singapore army to overwhelm the enemy through deliberate coordinated strikes from multiple directions (ie.coordinated swarming attacks * at 'multiple fronts' and 'the-depth' of the enemy at the same time).
1. To be ready for unconventional warfare (be it IEDs or Scuds or MLRS) and to meet evolving air threats, the SAF needs to invest in precision strike technology (to avoid blue on blue). The SAF when deployed, faces both conventional warfare and unconventional warfare threats.
2. As such, new technology and new doctrines are necessary to face new threats. Part of the RSAF's force modernization plans - is the move towards network centric warfare and an "Effects Based Operations" (EBO) theory of air warfare.
3. The purchases of the F-16Ds, F-15SGs and the Apache Longbows are investments in precision strike technology that enables a fundamental conceptual change in the traditional view (a linear view of the battle with a clear 'front') of the FSCL(fire support co-ordination line) and BAI (battlefield air interdiction) in RSAF's concept of air-land integration (see animation) via a combination of precision stand-off and close-in fire in support of the Singapore army.Precision weapons... a key enabler of effects-based operations by providing the ability to hit critical system nodes accurately... [However,] precision weapons also allow militaries to prosecute destruction-based campaigns...
The potential payoffs from EBO are so attractive that we should continue to devote resources towards studying complex systems... [and] put in place the appropriate staff structures needed to perform higher-level operations planning.
EBO by CPT Choy
4. The conceptual change is to a non-linear view of battle, to enable the Singapore army to overwhelm the enemy through deliberate coordinated strikes from multiple directions (ie.coordinated swarming attacks * at 'multiple fronts' and 'the-depth' of the enemy at the same time).
5. SAF recognizes that precision strike by itself is not sufficient. In fact, there is ongoing debate in the US and Israel on the usefulness of EBO. Recently, Marine Corps Gen. James N. Mattis, head of US Joint Forces Command, slammed EBO as being too complex and vague, while others defend EBO. A rethink of SAF's concept of air-land integration is ongoing to ensure that our doctrine remains relevant to the enemies the SAF may face in the future.American armour divisions demonstrated the ability to conduct a non-linear battle during Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). In OIF, three battalions (fewer than a thousand men) launched a violent thrust of tanks and armoured fighting vehicles into Baghdad via a "thunder-run". The thunder-run avoided a bloody street-by-street battle and brought Baghdad under coalition forces’ control in three days.Thunder Runs by MAJ Goh
Footnote* : John Arquilla and David Ronfeldt, "SWARMING and the Future of Conflict", RAND, 2003.[Amongst other problems with conventional armies] the military intelligence collection system has been optimised to obtain information on modern military forces, not for those involved in irregular conflicts... Sun Tzu argues that it is far more effective to attack an opponent's strategy than his army... Only strategic responses that incorporate both military and nonmilitary actions can achieve victory in low-intensity conflicts.
Low-intensity Conflicts by MAJ Hong
Last edited: