True. More T-64 then T-80. In fact given the numbers we have, ~2000 T-64, ~1000 T-72, and ~300 T-80, the T-80 are the ones not likely to be tearing through future battles. But given that the manufacturing and maintenance facilities in Ukraine are more available for the T-64 and T-80 types, the T-64 is likely to be the Ukranian MBT for the next decade or so at least.
EDIT: I guess my point is that showing off flashy prototypes that are essentially not in serial production is not a sign of a good military. It seems like many people think along the lines "OMg T-84. Ukraine = win." or "OmG T-95 (or Black Eagle. Russia = win." When really these tanks are in no way indicative of the general situation. If we want to asses the capabilities of the Ukrainian Army then we should look at the types in service, look at what (if any) large scale military exercises have taken place, what kind of funds are devoted to maintenance, and modernization, and the actual troop deployments. I would be quite interested in that kind of analysis, but this thread isn't producing anything along those lines
EDIT: I guess my point is that showing off flashy prototypes that are essentially not in serial production is not a sign of a good military. It seems like many people think along the lines "OMg T-84. Ukraine = win." or "OmG T-95 (or Black Eagle. Russia = win." When really these tanks are in no way indicative of the general situation. If we want to asses the capabilities of the Ukrainian Army then we should look at the types in service, look at what (if any) large scale military exercises have taken place, what kind of funds are devoted to maintenance, and modernization, and the actual troop deployments. I would be quite interested in that kind of analysis, but this thread isn't producing anything along those lines