RMAF Future; need opinions

renjer

New Member
Well, if you convince yourselves that it can be as easy as you suggested (a "clean" aka "fresh" deal), then of course, you will never understand what i had already pointed out.
The core of what i said earlier was that it is not easy to ensure the deal is as "clean" or as "fresh" as your optimized assumption. ;)
What I mean by a "clean" or "fresh" deal is one where we are not buying the undelivered MKAs. In other words, where our additional MKMs are purpose-built from scratch by the Russians.

The possibility that the Russians might withhold delivery after payment for a "clean" or "fresh" deal also exist. Therefore, the risk is no different from a deal involving a cancelled MKA deal. This is why I am not convinced that we should not explore a cancelled MKA deal based your argument of delivery risk.

My friend, I am sincerely interested in your thoughts on this matter and thank you for clarifying the core of your argument. If such a deal could become beneficial to our country then we must first explore all potential pitfalls. Unfortunately, you display poor sportmanship hiding a weak argument behind provocative innuendoes on my intellectual abilities. :D
 

qwerty223

New Member
I am totally lost of what you are trying about. Either my English is bad enough to misunderstand what you wrote, or you are unaware of what you post earlier.

You said
What I mean by a "clean" or "fresh" deal is one where we are not buying the undelivered MKAs. In other words, where our additional MKMs are purpose-built from scratch by the Russians.
in contrast to earlier post
If Malaysia were to take up the undelivered MKAs the original deal between the Russians and the Algerians would have to be formally cancelled first. That should take care of any potential ill feelings by the Algerians towards Malaysia.
then from the last post, the second paragraph:
The possibility that the Russians might withhold delivery after payment for a "clean" or "fresh" deal also exist. Therefore, the risk is no different from a deal involving a cancelled MKA deal. This is why I am not convinced that we should not explore a cancelled MKA deal based your argument of delivery risk.
You are confused I think. If you do mean that there is possibility to have a clean transaction of the ex-Algerian pre-produced Flanker, I would certainly agree with it. However I disagreed to precede the idea because the risk is high (as I explained) and the profit are not attractive enough to neglect the risk behind the scene. If you are suggesting new built airframes, I don't see the reason for bringing up such a matter.

Although I explained twice, but it seems it is not direct enough for you to understand how does the world politic works. I don't know if you are interested in this matter. As for myself, I had read a lot of these cases in deference media and sources. Probably you might want to Google to prove I am wrong. But I can assure you, that instead you will learn the reality, if you ever do so.

BTW, hope you understand what you wrote: If such a deal could become beneficial to our country then we must first explore all potential pitfalls.
 

ROCK45

New Member
Malaysian air force chief sets strategic focus

I found some RMAF news

Flight Interview: Malaysian air force chief sets strategic focus
By Siva Govindasamy
Fourth-generation multirole combat aircraft, rather than fifth-generation fighters remain the Royal Malaysian Air Force's near-term priority, with the service hoping to gradually build up its purchases to form six squadrons by 2025.

"To achieve this will require a big budget allocation," says RMAF chief Gen Azizan Ariffin. "Therefore we will be going by phases, and hopefully by 2025 we will have the total required platforms."

While types including the Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, Eurofighter Typhoon and Lockheed Martin F-16 could be offered to Malaysia, analysts believe that Kuala Lumpur wants to move to an all-Russian fleet of strike aircraft. The South-East Asian country ordered 18 Sukhoi Su-30MKMs in 2002, with deliveries scheduled to be completed by the end of this year, and although the air force also operates eight F/A-18Ds and 16 RSK MiG-29Ns, the Su-30MKM is the favourite for a new fighter deal. The service could seek funding for a follow-on buy in time for Malaysia's 2011-15 spending plan.

Neighbouring Singapore, which has ordered 24 Boeing F-15SGs and now operates South-East Asia's largest fleet of F-16s, could order the Lockheed F-35 Joint Strike Fighter early next decade, but Malaysia is not about to rush into a decision. "The RMAF will keep abreast with the latest technology and strategic environment in procuring future fighters. If there is requirement to go for a specific role platform, I am sure the RMAF will make a thorough study on those requirements," Azizan told Flight International during the Defence Services Asia exhibition in Kuala Lumpur late last month.

Link to full story (long article)
http://www.flightglobal.com/article...ian-air-force-chief-sets-strategic-focus.html
 

Mr Ignorant

New Member
Fourth-generation multirole combat aircraft, rather than fifth-generation fighters remain the Royal Malaysian Air Force's near-term priority, with the service hoping to gradually build up its purchases to form six squadrons by 2025.

"To achieve this will require a big budget allocation," says RMAF chief Gen Azizan Ariffin. "Therefore we will be going by phases, and hopefully by 2025 we will have the total required platforms."

While types including the Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, Eurofighter Typhoon and Lockheed Martin F-16 could be offered to Malaysia, analysts believe that Kuala Lumpur wants to move to an all-Russian fleet of strike aircraft. The South-East Asian country ordered 18 Sukhoi Su-30MKMs in 2002, with deliveries scheduled to be completed by the end of this year, and although the air force also operates eight F/A-18Ds and 16 RSK MiG-29Ns, the Su-30MKM is the favourite for a new fighter deal. The service could seek funding for a follow-on buy in time for Malaysia's 2011-15 spending plan.

Neighbouring Singapore, which has ordered 24 Boeing F-15SGs and now operates South-East Asia's largest fleet of F-16s, could order the Lockheed F-35 Joint Strike Fighter early next decade, but Malaysia is not about to rush into a decision. "The RMAF will keep abreast with the latest technology and strategic environment in procuring future fighters. If there is requirement to go for a specific role platform, I am sure the RMAF will make a thorough study on those requirements," Azizan told Flight International during the Defence Services Asia exhibition in Kuala Lumpur late last month.


© Rolls-Royce

A more immediate priority is the acquisition of airborne early warning and control aircraft, with funding again likely to be sought under the 2011-15 ninth Malaysia plan. "The requirement has been discussed earlier and officially registered during the eighth Malaysia plan, but due to budget constraints, we were not able to launch it," says Azizan. The contenders are likely to be the Embraer EMB-145 and Saab 2000 equipped with Saab Microwave Systems' Erieye radar, and Northrop Grumman's E-2C Hawkeye 2000.

Maritime patrol aircraft are also needed as part of Malaysia's commitment to joint surveillance of the Malacca Straits with Indonesia and Singapore. The budget, however, may not stretch to that in the near term. "As a maritime nation, MPA is an imminent requirement," says Azizan. "The budget allocation may not allow for a complete inventory, but we may go by phases, just like the MRCA [fighter] programme."

The MPA project will go hand in hand with a navy requirement for anti-submarine warfare helicopters, also likely to be included in the ninth Malaysia plan. The contenders could include the AgustaWestland Super Lynx, Kaman SH-2 Seasprite, Kamov Ka-28, NH Industries NH90 and Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawk. "The total platform required is to cater for 24/7 operations between the two theatres of Malaysia," says Azizan.

Additional rotorcraft are high on the list of priorities for Malaysia. A competition to replace the Sikorsky S-61 Nuri transport and utility helicopter, which Azizan says has served the armed forces "gallantly for more than 40 years", is imminent. Over 90 armed forces personnel and civilians have died in crashes involving the type since 1968, and calls for their replacement increased after the last incident in 2007.

Azizan acknowledges that accidents and the lower number of S-61s in service have increased the maintenance and operating costs of the fleet, and that "the low availability of the Nuri has lowered the RMAF's heliborne readiness". Kuala Lumpur has assessed the AgustaWestland AW101, Eurocopter EC725, Mil Mi-17 and Sikorsky S-92, and a shortlist had been expected early this year. An initial order for 12 aircraft is anticipated, but this could eventually rise to 48.

However, a decision has been delayed until late 2008, as the Malaysian cabinet must approve a special budget for the purchase. This is unlikely to happen until the future of prime minister Abdullah Badawi, whose ruling coalition returned to power with a much lower majority and lost several key states to the opposition, has been resolved.

While Malaysia has been inducting unmanned air vehicles, it could also begin a study into unmanned combat air vehicles in the future. "This will require further study on its concept and implementation, due to the laws governing the conduct of participants in war," says Azizan.

From a broader perspective, the RMAF's modernisation effort will seek to balance "factors including budget constraints, relative comparison, how much is enough [and] those areas in which we are lacking," Azizan says. "Our main areas of focus are towards refining our operational strategies and concepts, equipping the RMAF with high-tech weapons and weapon systems, and of course ensuring the competency and professionalism of our personnel."
 

ROCK45

New Member
No fees in submarine, jet deal

I didn't know there was some internal matters going on. I hope this doesn't hurt the chances for a second Flanker squadron purchase.

No fees in submarine, jet deal
KUALA LUMPUR: The Government has never paid anyone commission for the procurement of two Scorpene submarines and 18 Sukhoi fighter jets, said Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

He said Malaysia had direct negotiations with the countries involved.

The submarines were purchased from France and Spain and the jets from Russia.

“On the allegation made by Yang Berhormat Permatang Pauh (Opposition Leader Datin Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail) that Perimekar Sdn Bhd had received a commission of ?114.96mil (RM580.46mil) in the Scorpene submarines deal, the ministry wants to stress that the Government has never paid any commission directly or indirectly to the company.

“On the purchase of Sukhoi, I want to stress that the Government has never paid any commission to IMT (M) Defence Sdn Bhd as alleged,” Najib said in his winding-up speech on the motion of thanks on the Royal Address in the Dewan Rakyat here yesterday.

He was responding to renewed allegations by Wan Azizah that the purchase of the two submarines worth RM4.5bil involved the payment of a commission exceeding RM540mil to Perimekar.

Wan Azizah had also alleged that Perimekar was owned by Abdul Razak Baginda, who was an adviser to Najib.

He said the contract was signed on June 5, 2002, by the Malaysian Government with manufacturers DCNS (France) and Navantia (Spain) and Perimekar Sdn Bhd, as the project services provider.

Najib also explained that Syarikat Perimekar Sdn Bhd, which was owned by Armed Forces Welfare Fund, Boustead Holdings Berhad and K.S Ombak Laut Sdn Bhd, had to provide accommodation for 27 families of the officers in France and Spain for six years.

On allegations against him being involved in the murder case of Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu, Najib reiterated that he had never met or knew the woman.

He also said he did not want to make any comments as the hearing of the case was still going on.

“I know that some of the Dewan members are concerned about the court case of the murder of a Mongolian woman, and I also know that there are some members who deliberately tried to link my name to the case.

“Let the court play its role and carry out its responsibility to uphold justice in this country without any party interfering,” he said.

On the issue of national service, Najib said the Government would continue with the programme as it promotes unity although there were accidents and fatal cases.

Najib said the ministry was also considering making medical check-ups compulsory for every trainee.

Link
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/5/15/nation/21258818&sec=nation
 

Mr Ignorant

New Member
It shouldn't. The Air Chief is pushing for 6 squadrons to be refitted by 2025 and the emphasis is on Gen 4.5; It appears the SU 30MKM will be the platform of choice, but I suspect the Malaysians are going to wait for the results of the Indian MRCA (especially on the outcome of the Mig 35) before studying any future purchases. They will put in another bid for 1 more SU 30MKM squadron in the next 5 year plan but that is still very much in the pipeline. I also tend to think that decisions will have some clarity after UMNO's party elections later on this year.
 

nevidimka

New Member
I didn't know there was some internal matters going on. I hope this doesn't hurt the chances for a second Flanker squadron purchase.

No fees in submarine, jet deal
KUALA LUMPUR: The Government has never paid anyone commission for the procurement of two Scorpene submarines and 18 Sukhoi fighter jets, said Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

He said Malaysia had direct negotiations with the countries involved.

The submarines were purchased from France and Spain and the jets from Russia.

“On the allegation made by Yang Berhormat Permatang Pauh (Opposition Leader Datin Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail) that Perimekar Sdn Bhd had received a commission of ?114.96mil (RM580.46mil) in the Scorpene submarines deal, the ministry wants to stress that the Government has never paid any commission directly or indirectly to the company.

“On the purchase of Sukhoi, I want to stress that the Government has never paid any commission to IMT (M) Defence Sdn Bhd as alleged,” Najib said in his winding-up speech on the motion of thanks on the Royal Address in the Dewan Rakyat here yesterday.

He was responding to renewed allegations by Wan Azizah that the purchase of the two submarines worth RM4.5bil involved the payment of a commission exceeding RM540mil to Perimekar.

Wan Azizah had also alleged that Perimekar was owned by Abdul Razak Baginda, who was an adviser to Najib.

He said the contract was signed on June 5, 2002, by the Malaysian Government with manufacturers DCNS (France) and Navantia (Spain) and Perimekar Sdn Bhd, as the project services provider.

Najib also explained that Syarikat Perimekar Sdn Bhd, which was owned by Armed Forces Welfare Fund, Boustead Holdings Berhad and K.S Ombak Laut Sdn Bhd, had to provide accommodation for 27 families of the officers in France and Spain for six years.

On allegations against him being involved in the murder case of Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu, Najib reiterated that he had never met or knew the woman.

He also said he did not want to make any comments as the hearing of the case was still going on.

“I know that some of the Dewan members are concerned about the court case of the murder of a Mongolian woman, and I also know that there are some members who deliberately tried to link my name to the case.

“Let the court play its role and carry out its responsibility to uphold justice in this country without any party interfering,” he said.

On the issue of national service, Najib said the Government would continue with the programme as it promotes unity although there were accidents and fatal cases.

Najib said the ministry was also considering making medical check-ups compulsory for every trainee.

Link
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/5/15/nation/21258818&sec=nation

maybe news for foreigners, but not for Malaysians. Whatever Najib say is a plain WHITE LIE. If there are allegations of money being paid for those purchases, they are true. Most all Major Arms deal by Malaysia have illegal payments going somewhere they dont belong. Its just the Gov of the present will wash any allegations against Najib under the carpet as he is a heir apparent to the Prime Minister role in future, so his image must not have any blemishes in it, but he is guilty for every accusations, including the Mongolian girls death.

Anyways, IF Anwar comes to power, I hope he do not change the procurement policy back to US, as its really costly and we already started the road heading for Russian jets. Changing it will be absurd n costly.
 

nevidimka

New Member
BTW, i wantd to ask a question regarding the russian cockpit glass on the su 30 MKM n all new russian fighter for that matter. They dont have the gold like tint on western glass cockpit. What is the function of the tint on western fighters?
IF its the gold tint on stealth planes to absorb radar reflection from inside the cockpit then i'd understand, but what with the tint on conventional planes?
 

nevidimka

New Member
The 1st report i got on Indian Su 30 MKI vs SIngapore's Israel modified F16's.
Are there any more detailed reports?

NEW DELHI: India need not lose sleep even if Pakistan manages to acquire more F-16 fighters from the US. After plastering American combat pilots in an exercise earlier this year, IAF top guns now have another reason to be gung ho: their top-notch mean machines have proved more than a match for F-16s, the much-vaunted 'fighting falcons'.

Russian-origin Sukhoi-30MKI jets are apparently outgunning American F-16s on "several aspects" at the ongoing Indo-Singapore air combat exercise in Gwalior.

This is the first-ever face-off between these two sophisticated war machines originating from the two former Cold War adversaries.

"Our Sukhois are doing very well against the F-16Cs (of Singapore Air Force) in terms of manoeuvrability, sophistication of avionics and weapon systems. Similarly, our MiG-29s and Mirage-2000s are also matching up to the F-16s," say IAF sources.


http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-896301,curpg-1.cms
 

qwerty223

New Member
BTW, i wantd to ask a question regarding the russian cockpit glass on the su 30 MKM n all new russian fighter for that matter. They dont have the gold like tint on western glass cockpit. What is the function of the tint on western fighters?
IF its the gold tint on stealth planes to absorb radar reflection from inside the cockpit then i'd understand, but what with the tint on conventional planes?
LoL, obviously they act the same as "air-cool" tint on ur car.... How come they can absorb radar waves? ;)
 

nevidimka

New Member
LoL, obviously they act the same as "air-cool" tint on ur car.... How come they can absorb radar waves? ;)
The tint on the stealth aircraft like F22, is ment to absorb radar wave.

I'm just curious about the tint on conventional western planes, coz the russian planes dont have it.
 

nevidimka

New Member
The hornet also carries the AIM 120 Amraam, based from the website.

Btw are there any pics of the RMAF Flankers n Mig 29 side by side?
 

swerve

Super Moderator
The tint on the stealth aircraft like F22, is ment to absorb radar wave.

I'm just curious about the tint on conventional western planes, coz the russian planes dont have it.
If by "conventional" you mean Rafale, Typhoon & Gripen, it serves the same purpose as on F-22. It's to stop radar waves penetrating the cockpit & reflecting off the interior, which would produce a much greater return than reflections off the canopy.
 

nevidimka

New Member
If by "conventional" you mean Rafale, Typhoon & Gripen, it serves the same purpose as on F-22. It's to stop radar waves penetrating the cockpit & reflecting off the interior, which would produce a much greater return than reflections off the canopy.
But they are conventional types. The radar is reflecting from its own airframe already?. If it does help in reduction why is it not available on Russian export flankers like the MKI and MKM?
 
Top