weasel1962
New Member
Re:
Deleted
Deleted
Last edited:
What I mean by a "clean" or "fresh" deal is one where we are not buying the undelivered MKAs. In other words, where our additional MKMs are purpose-built from scratch by the Russians.Well, if you convince yourselves that it can be as easy as you suggested (a "clean" aka "fresh" deal), then of course, you will never understand what i had already pointed out.
The core of what i said earlier was that it is not easy to ensure the deal is as "clean" or as "fresh" as your optimized assumption.
in contrast to earlier postWhat I mean by a "clean" or "fresh" deal is one where we are not buying the undelivered MKAs. In other words, where our additional MKMs are purpose-built from scratch by the Russians.
then from the last post, the second paragraph:If Malaysia were to take up the undelivered MKAs the original deal between the Russians and the Algerians would have to be formally cancelled first. That should take care of any potential ill feelings by the Algerians towards Malaysia.
You are confused I think. If you do mean that there is possibility to have a clean transaction of the ex-Algerian pre-produced Flanker, I would certainly agree with it. However I disagreed to precede the idea because the risk is high (as I explained) and the profit are not attractive enough to neglect the risk behind the scene. If you are suggesting new built airframes, I don't see the reason for bringing up such a matter.The possibility that the Russians might withhold delivery after payment for a "clean" or "fresh" deal also exist. Therefore, the risk is no different from a deal involving a cancelled MKA deal. This is why I am not convinced that we should not explore a cancelled MKA deal based your argument of delivery risk.
I didn't know there was some internal matters going on. I hope this doesn't hurt the chances for a second Flanker squadron purchase.
No fees in submarine, jet deal
KUALA LUMPUR: The Government has never paid anyone commission for the procurement of two Scorpene submarines and 18 Sukhoi fighter jets, said Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.
He said Malaysia had direct negotiations with the countries involved.
The submarines were purchased from France and Spain and the jets from Russia.
“On the allegation made by Yang Berhormat Permatang Pauh (Opposition Leader Datin Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail) that Perimekar Sdn Bhd had received a commission of ?114.96mil (RM580.46mil) in the Scorpene submarines deal, the ministry wants to stress that the Government has never paid any commission directly or indirectly to the company.
“On the purchase of Sukhoi, I want to stress that the Government has never paid any commission to IMT (M) Defence Sdn Bhd as alleged,” Najib said in his winding-up speech on the motion of thanks on the Royal Address in the Dewan Rakyat here yesterday.
He was responding to renewed allegations by Wan Azizah that the purchase of the two submarines worth RM4.5bil involved the payment of a commission exceeding RM540mil to Perimekar.
Wan Azizah had also alleged that Perimekar was owned by Abdul Razak Baginda, who was an adviser to Najib.
He said the contract was signed on June 5, 2002, by the Malaysian Government with manufacturers DCNS (France) and Navantia (Spain) and Perimekar Sdn Bhd, as the project services provider.
Najib also explained that Syarikat Perimekar Sdn Bhd, which was owned by Armed Forces Welfare Fund, Boustead Holdings Berhad and K.S Ombak Laut Sdn Bhd, had to provide accommodation for 27 families of the officers in France and Spain for six years.
On allegations against him being involved in the murder case of Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu, Najib reiterated that he had never met or knew the woman.
He also said he did not want to make any comments as the hearing of the case was still going on.
“I know that some of the Dewan members are concerned about the court case of the murder of a Mongolian woman, and I also know that there are some members who deliberately tried to link my name to the case.
“Let the court play its role and carry out its responsibility to uphold justice in this country without any party interfering,” he said.
On the issue of national service, Najib said the Government would continue with the programme as it promotes unity although there were accidents and fatal cases.
Najib said the ministry was also considering making medical check-ups compulsory for every trainee.
Link
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/5/15/nation/21258818&sec=nation
LoL, obviously they act the same as "air-cool" tint on ur car.... How come they can absorb radar waves?BTW, i wantd to ask a question regarding the russian cockpit glass on the su 30 MKM n all new russian fighter for that matter. They dont have the gold like tint on western glass cockpit. What is the function of the tint on western fighters?
IF its the gold tint on stealth planes to absorb radar reflection from inside the cockpit then i'd understand, but what with the tint on conventional planes?
The tint on the stealth aircraft like F22, is ment to absorb radar wave.LoL, obviously they act the same as "air-cool" tint on ur car.... How come they can absorb radar waves?
If by "conventional" you mean Rafale, Typhoon & Gripen, it serves the same purpose as on F-22. It's to stop radar waves penetrating the cockpit & reflecting off the interior, which would produce a much greater return than reflections off the canopy.The tint on the stealth aircraft like F22, is ment to absorb radar wave.
I'm just curious about the tint on conventional western planes, coz the russian planes dont have it.
But they are conventional types. The radar is reflecting from its own airframe already?. If it does help in reduction why is it not available on Russian export flankers like the MKI and MKM?If by "conventional" you mean Rafale, Typhoon & Gripen, it serves the same purpose as on F-22. It's to stop radar waves penetrating the cockpit & reflecting off the interior, which would produce a much greater return than reflections off the canopy.