who can kill a modern Main Battle Tank (MBT)?

Status
Not open for further replies.

aaaditya

New Member
by the way can someone tell me how exactly does an applique armour function in the protecting the under side of a heavy main battle tank,also can a couple of 25 kg claymore mines detonatedi n a pile under a battle tank track cause enough damage to destroy the tank and kill its crew.
 

Pursuit Curve

New Member
by the way can someone tell me how exactly does an applique armour function in the protecting the under side of a heavy main battle tank,also can a couple of 25 kg claymore mines detonatedi n a pile under a battle tank track cause enough damage to destroy the tank and kill its crew.
Claymore mines do not weigh 25 kg, and if that is what you would use to take on a tank....well, I leave it up to your imagination!
 

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
What do you want to hear?
Against well performed mine cicles a tank brigade has many problems as long as these minefields are secured by a potent AT and infantry force.
That is nothing new.
It is a very important part of our combined arms doctrine.
But just remember.
The rebells just don't need to kill some tanks on lonely patrols...


Often enough this thread looks like a "I am able to cripple the mighty M1A2SEP" thread.

@Grand Danois
I really like your kind of posts even if it comes to mud battles like in this thread.
Denmark is much nearer to me than most of germany these days. ;) :)
 
Last edited:

Pursuit Curve

New Member
What do you want to hear?
Against well performed mine cicles a tank brigade has many problems as long as these minefields are secured by a potent AT and infantry force.
That is nothing new.
It is a very important part of our combined arms doctrine.
But just remember.
The rebells just don't need to kill some tanks on lonely patrols...


Often enough this thread looks like a "I am able to cripple the mighty M1A2SEP" thread.

@Grand Danois
I really like your kind of posts even if it comes to mud battles like in this thread.
Denmark is much nearer to me than most of germany these days. ;) :)

Yeah, I know, there are many what ifs on this thread, maybe we should start a new thread called "Who can Kill the Who can Kill an Abrams Thread" !! :)
 

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
:D
A gentleman never speakes about his wifes! ;)

But to be serious demark is much nearer to than bavaria in terms of kilometers and thinking.
Kiel is not that far away from denmark and I do more like the danish way of live than the sothern german one. :)
Not to talk of the sister unit of my btl. Mad drinkers but nice tankmen! :cool: :D
 

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
For sure they know how to make beer but they are too conservative.
Too many small villages with too many old school persons.
The north of germany is much more liberale than the south.
If Bavaria could vote for the future of germany the german wall would rise again and we would be much less liberale than before.

I really like the way of living in denmark but your beer is too expensive.
Carlsberg tastes good but your taxes on alcohol are ludicrous :D
 

Grand Danois

Entertainer
Yes, beer is too expensive. Carlsberg is good, but if you get the chance you should try out the beers from some of the microbreweries. Now, that's good beer.

The taxes on liqour are heavy, but then again much less than in Sweden! Anyway, I do mostly in single malts, which means taxes does not make up for most of the price.

Another positive thing is that we have good taste in tanks. ;)
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
:D
A gentleman never speakes about his wifes! ;)

But to be serious demark is much nearer to than bavaria in terms of kilometers and thinking.
Kiel is not that far away from denmark and I do more like the danish way of live than the sothern german one. :)
Not to talk of the sister unit of my btl. Mad drinkers but nice tankmen! :cool: :D
Interesting observation. From all my dealings with germans and danes (and I have a german based business associate so I get there quite a bit) I would have said that danes are far more like middle to northern germans. (ie north of hanover/ladenburg/mannheim line...)

danes are far more relaxed and friendly than southern germans IMV.

funnily enough, my business partner jokingly refers to danes as nth western germans, one of my danish associates referred to germans as south eastern danes. ;)

maybe I'm meeting the wrong germans.... :rolleyes:
 

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
That's what I ment but I just forgot a "me" in my sentence. :eek:

The right sentence was supposed to be like this:
"But to be serious demark is much nearer to ME than bavaria in terms of kilometers and thinking." :)
 

Andrei_bt

New Member
A T90 is a T72-BU with an uprated gun. Even with reactive plates it will not survive a tank on tank duel. (see Iraq 1999). It has been proven to be vulnerable to TOW, Hellfires, Dragons, Milans and Javelins.
TOW, Hellfires, Dragons...

It is more correct to differentiate T-72-s, as the are of many tipes.
The above mantioned T-72-s of Iraq, which were velnurable to most end 80-th era ATGM/rounds is 70-th technology. And it is no surprase it is destroyed by modern ammunition of that time.
But after that the T-72 changed serveral , modification - T-72, T-72A, T-72B (it has 3 different passive armour upgrades without changing the designation), T-72BM, T-72BU (later a early version of T-90 with cast turret), T-90A (version with welded new turret).

The protection from basic variant improoved about 3 times.

BTW, T-72 (basic version can not be penetrated by Dragon and basic TOW missile).


On the photo below - a T-72 of Iraqi army hit by dragon, it was painted after hit, the hole, without penetration ramained on the turret. Later tha tank was captured and scraped.
 

Andrei_bt

New Member
There was 3 tank plants in the USSR
Yes, 3 main plants.
But plant does not mean a design beurough which designs it.

Kharkov (Ukraine) T-64, T-84 present days
Nizhniy Tagil (Russia)- T-72, T-90, R&D of T-95
Omsk (Russia) – T-64, T-80, R&D of Black eagle
Omsk (Russia) never produced T-64, also it never designed T-80 (designed in Leningrad)
 

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
To be a little more precise.
Which TOW version is not able to penetrate which T-72 version?
 

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
I know that during tests our TOWs penetrated ex east german T-72M1.
But I am not able to find what kind of TOW they used.
I go on searching or it. :)
 

19kilo

New Member
I Was There

i have the pics of the destroyed m1 with the turret blown off but i cant seem to upload them if any one can help let me know i am curious to find out how this tank was destroyed.
i get this error when i try
-PHP running on your server does not support the GD image library, check with your webhost if ImageMagick is installe-
they are staanderd jpeg pics
The only reason that I became a member on this site is because I was there on the day of October 28, 2003. I can't stop thinking about what I saw that day. I don't know why but I want to see the pictures. Since that day I have thought about it everyday. So, I would appreciate if who ever has the pictures would send them to my email at [email protected] If you have any questions about what happen, I'll answer what I can. Thank You...
 

Chrom

New Member
TOW, Hellfires, Dragons...

It is more correct to differentiate T-72-s, as the are of many tipes.
The above mantioned T-72-s of Iraq, which were velnurable to most end 80-th era ATGM/rounds is 70-th technology. And it is no surprase it is destroyed by modern ammunition of that time.
But after that the T-72 changed serveral , modification - T-72, T-72A, T-72B (it has 3 different passive armour upgrades without changing the designation), T-72BM, T-72BU (later a early version of T-90 with cast turret), T-90A (version with welded new turret).

The protection from basic variant improoved about 3 times.
Moreover, on the example of the last Israel compaign we can see what supposely most protected between western tanks - Merkava 4 - is also vulnerable to same 70-80x ATGM's - Fagot, TOW, Konkurs, etc. I wouldnt bet what M1A2 fare any better in these conditions. Any modern tank have weakened zones, and most western tanks have smaller arc of "best" protection when russian T-style tanks. Besides, the original Abrams - M1 - was hardly better armor protected when same era T-72. Again, i wouldnt drive any conclusion relating current M1A2HE on that basis.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top