Its irrelevant what you think is relevant or nonsensical - its what the Kosovars think is relevant. I interviewed a number of Kosovars post conflict and they certainly held a historical perspective on the length of their struggleI didn't even mention Crimea. I mentioned South Ossetia. In both cases a foreign power launched a military action, without an approval of UN, against another country in order to support local separatist movements, which where fighting the central government. In both cases the population of the seceded provinces largely looked at the intervening forces with sympathies. In both cases, invading powers claimed that the invasion was launched in order to curtail the ethnic cleansing (although, there where obvious anterior motives).
And in both cases one country was accusing the other, of the same transgressions of international law, of which the said country was culpable her self.
In the end, none of that mattered. The only think that was important at the end, was sheer military and political influence on the ground.
Btw....750 years of struggle for "autonomy" of Kosovo is utter nationalist nonsense, (as is the case with most of these narratives of multi millennial "struggle" for national "liberation" around the world). However knowing how these arguments usually end up (especially related to Balkans) ill refrain on elaborating, since it is irrelevant.
change your attitude - I'm not in the mood to suffer people who are going to be prickly just because others have a different view.
as for me mentioning Crimea - that's relevant to me - so in effect - so what. You're free to mention Sth Ossetia, as everyone else would be free to mention Georgia, Crimea, Estonia, Poland or whatever other country or region has some insight into the cause and effect of another countries geopolitical attention