It doesn't seem too insightful. Turkey and Russia in the post-Cold War world have had a much more complex relationship that was worsened and simplified with the shoot down of the bomber. However before this Turkey was a major player in the Russian economy, there is still a major nuke plant deal, and Turkey actually traded with Russian Crimea, post-annexation, and still trades with the Russian protectorate of Abkhazia. The article also ignores the increasingly unpleasant role Turkey plays in the region, from their use of refugees to blackmail Europe, to their confrontationalism with Greece, to their actions inside Syria and Iraq. Their ties to ISIS and anti-Kurdish sentiment so violent they'd rather have al-Qaeda then the Kurds (al-Nusra in Azaz), is simply the latest straw (or perhaps bundle of brick) on the camel's back. Maybe the camel can carry this load too, but should it?
EDIT: To put it another way, if Russia hadn't intervened in Syria, Turkey would have happily continued to undermine the united NATO/EU stance on Russian involvement in Ukraine by continuing to buy Russian military goods, sell Russia military tech, and trade with regions that are under EU sanctions.
EDIT2: Edrogan recently talked about reconciliation with Russia, and they just arrested the rebel fighter who allegedly killed the Russian pilot. If you recall, punishing those responsible for the death was one of Russia's demands. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some effort to normalize relations. Especially seeing how the giant nuke plant deal is still proceeding.
Análisis Militares: Detenido en Turquía el asesino del piloto ruso
