That's correct. BTW, the 6.8mm as I understand is different than the .270 Winchester (which is a necked down .30-06). The 6.8mm is based on a rimless 30-30 (necked down to .270), so it won't have quite the ballistics of the .270 Win, but should be a little more controllable in the SAW version (than the 7.62 NATO). Ballistically it would be closer to the 7.62 NATO (.308 Win.) in energy, but flatter shooting and should carry the energy downrange a little better due to the smaller caliber.Gremlin29 said:It appears that the version with snail drum and bipod will be utilized as a squad weapon?
Looking at the pistol version of the M8, even in 5.56 it looks like a handfull!
I think my comment on the telescopic sights was incorrect though, IIRC the telescopic sight I was thinking about is for a new large caliber sniper system that is scheduled to replace or supplement the Barrett .50's and M2's. Part of the M25 program. The M8 sniper version will have the same integrated sight as the others, at least to start out. It will also be fitted with the bipod and a 20" barrel. There is also a snap-on 12 gauge shotgun for the M8 as well as the grenade launcher.
The other thing I mentioned in passing was the M25 system. The original planning was to have a single weapon, 25mm/5.56 in an over-under configuration. It proved to be too heavy and awkward, so it was split into two seperate weapons. The M25 is to have several different types of rounds, but the one I thought was interesting was the 25mm computerized airburst round. You dial in the distance to the target on the receiver, and if the bad guys are hunkered down behind a barricade, you send the round over their heads. When it gets to the programmed distance, it explodes, sending 600 pieces of shrapnel raining down. Great for shooting around corners, too!
-CM