vikingatespam
Well-Known Member
A sunk ship should likely be leaking oil onto the water and should be noticable by satellite pics. So far there isnt any evidence for a big result.
1,000 KIA is quite realistic. Why wouldn't it be? In many state on state conflicts that would be easily achieved in less than a hour. WW1 battles are classic examples of that, and some WW2 battles as well. We humans have grown very technologically efficient at butchering ourselves in warfare over the last 120 years.Dont believe either the RU or UKR MOD statements. 1000 KIA in one day is not realistic.
Oil can be dispersed by ambient sea conditions and these days there are chemical dispersants. Also satellite detection it depends upon satellite availability, the waveband the image is taken in, time of day, sun position and cloud cover.A sunk ship should likely be leaking oil onto the water and should be noticable by satellite pics. So far there isnt any evidence for a big result.
In one day, in a war of relatively low intensity and high dispersion across most of the front ? I recall reading German and US casualty reports for the westwall battles, and KIA for entire corps were pretty low on a daily basis.1,000 KIA is quite realistic. Why wouldn't it be? In many state on state conflicts that would be easily achieved in less than a hour. WW1 battles are classic examples of that, and some WW2 battles as well. We humans have grown very technologically efficient at butchering ourselves in warfare over the last 120 years.
Granted, but given that the RU didnt even appear to have torpedo nets across the harbor entrance, Im not going to give them high chances for having dispersants on hand. Color me jaded.Oil can be dispersed by ambient sea conditions and these days there are chemical dispersants. Also satellite detection it depends upon satellite availability, the waveband the image is taken in, time of day, sun position and cloud cover.
Not saying that the 1,000 claimed by Ukraine is accurate but the battlefield in Ukraine is a mix of scenarios between WWI, WWII and modern assets mixed in. Some areas it's mobile warfare and others it's largely trench warfare.In one day, in a war of relatively low intensity and high dispersion across most of the front ? I recall reading German and US casualty reports for the westwall battles, and KIA for entire corps were pretty low on a daily basis.
1000 _casualties_, maybe. 1000 KIA, doubt it. 1000 KIA = 4000 WIA, for 5000 casualties in one day ? Hmmmm.....
not the clearest resource, but here:
Germany KIA for June 6 to August 31 = 30,000. About 555/day for a period of high intensity warfare. Allies were ~800/day.
A better comparison would be casualties as a % of force, but its hard to lay the groundwork for both sides here.
Weapon lethality has increased steadily, but losses as a % of force have declined over the same time. A bit of a paradox, but its due to dispersion. DuPuy/QJM.
Not speaking directly about the current Russia-Ukraine conflict as I do not know enough about either side's casevac/medevac or emergency medical capabilities, but for other nations at least it is not a paradox at all.Weapon lethality has increased steadily, but losses as a % of force have declined over the same time. A bit of a paradox, but its due to dispersion. DuPuy/QJM.
Low morale does not necessary lead to mass surrenders or desertions, even when there is low morale there are other factors at play that will keep units together. Low morale will make units less effective, but the fear of the unknown, a natural desire to stick with the group of people that you have become comfortable with or friends with and discipline, which my understanding can tend to be somewhat hash in some sections of the Russian military. I think it would be unlikely that you will see mass desertions, unless the problem increases to include the complete structure of a unit. As for mass surrenders, this is unlikely unless a unit becomes completely isolated and surrounded. Low morale will lead to risk aversion by the individual and lower performance levels.We've been hearing non stop about morale issues for months now but surprisingly we haven't seen mass surrenders or desertions.
Indeed but this is an army which we've been told has had morale issues since February and it's November now. I have absolutely no doubt that morale is an issue but I suspect it's been exaggerated [like many reports we've been fed] and it varies greatly from unit to unit.Low morale does not necessary lead to mass surrenders or desertions, even when there is low morale there are other factors at play that will keep units together. .
Russians fled Kharkiv faster than Usain Bolt. At this point, it's hard to deny their morale issues.Indeed but this is an army which we've been told has had morale issues since February and it's November now. I have absolutely no doubt that morale is an issue but I suspect it's been exaggerated [like many reports we've been fed] and it varies greatly from unit to unit.
Nobody is denying there are morale issues [as was clearly made clear in my post]. What I'm suggesting is that the issue of morale may have been exaggerated [like various other things] and that it varies from unit to unit. We've been hearing about morale issues since February and it's November now; an army with deep rooted and widespread morale issues has lasted this long? If the Russians are still in the fight in 6 months time are we still going to hear about morale issues? Or about how Russia is supposedly low on missile stocks; despite us not knowing how many missiles it had to begin with. I also question if some of the claims we hear are based on actual intel or is an attempt at disinformation.Russians fled Kharkiv faster than Usain Bolt. At this point, it's hard to deny their morale issues.
With regards to missile stocks, I think the public actions of the RU - buying drones and now missiles from Iran, is an indication of low stocks. how low ? Who knows....Nobody is denying there are morale issues [as was clearly made clear in my post]. What I'm suggesting is that the issue of morale may have been exaggerated [like various other things] and that it varies from unit to unit. We've been hearing about morale issues since February and it's November now; an army with deep rooted and widespread morale issues has lasted this long? If the Russians are still in the fight in 6 months time are we still going to hear about morale issues? Or about how Russia is supposedly low on missile stocks; despite us not knowing how many missiles it had to begin with. I also question if some of the claims we hear are based on actual intel or is an attempt at disinformation.
As for fleeing ''faster'' maybe but was it a hasty organised retreat to prevent being outflanked or was it a rout? I have no idea.