Another forum said this includes the FSV variant with the 105 (even the video said Pandur 8x8 FSV), I thought it was rumored to be discontinued?Indonesian Defense Vloger put video on the signing of Licensing Agreement between Czech Group and PINDAD for Pandur II. At least this is already contract agreement for licensing production.
Yes, that's why it's still rumours. No confirmation from TNI-AD whether they are still interest with 105 8×8. However so far the initial order not included. Still we don't know whether the licensing agreement included this type, or it's only based model licensing and Pindad open to build their own version.thought it was rumored to be discontinued?
3. A 105mm armed medium tank is far better than a 105mm armed 8x8; as TNI-AD’s 8x8 are better off carrying infantry, armed with anti-tank weapons to hide in restricted terrain against a capable enemy. By way of reference, the SAF’s Terrex equipped battalions (that are for mobile battles over a long distance), have:…while 105mm will be focus to with the medium Tank.
I have not seen official TNI-AD position, however seeing that initial Pandur II order related to APC version, perhaps those rumours have some ground. Providing mobile Infantry concepts seems taking more priority. Perhaps they also find putting 105mm in Pandur II chassis bit too much.
Pindad already build their own facilities for automated weapon platform. Those including turrets and RCWS.the status of the plan/program? Is it canceled or are the Protectors later directly delivered from Norway?
It's officially production model now if it's at a FAT stage. Is this the first unit completed out of the 18 unit of the first batch?Pindad doing test on part of Factory Acceptance Test with their Medium Tank JV with Turkey FMSS. The test already been done with the latest Prototype model, where the frontal slope already been modified.
I believe this's still the prototype. However seems this's going to be closer to production model.this the first unit completed out of the 18 unit of the first batch?
Too much speculations from on line sources now. There are speculations and rumours of:heard the Army leadership is not to keen on these tanks, why though I have no idea.
What I'm more concerned of is the the production line capacity. Pindad industrial complex is not that big. If we compared to production line of Japanese or Korean car makers in Indonesia alone, Pindad Automative facilities still like a small workshop compared to them. Even with Mercedes Benz facilities in Wanaherang or BMW ones in North Jakarta (which's much smaller compared to Toyota or Daihatsu facilities), Pindad facilities can't be say bigger then those European car makers ones.Do they have the ability to cope with it without a hit in production output and/or quality?
It might not be preferable to change the gun to 120 mm. Other than adding weight, it may also reduce the ammo capacity compare to 105 mm, and that's assuming the hull can take the extra weight. For all we know, they never intended to put 120 mm in there, and thus they didn't design the hull with upgrade in mind.Pindad FB shown more photos on the Factory Acceptance Test on the 105mm Medium Tank. As whether the turret can be equipped for bigger gun, cockerill practically talk in their sites, the turret being design for both 105mm and 120mm.
Personally i prefer the standard TNI-camouflage. Its proven to be effective. Hopefully the new camouflage pattern is created because its even better, not because "we didn't have our own pattern" (pure ego).
It's the new army camo they showed during the recent RAPIM, what do you think?
I thought it was adopted exclusively by KOSTRAD currently, wasn't it?This TNI-AD SAKTI uniform that being put forward during SBY era. However politics play in this matter, even on choosing uniform.