Post 1 of 2: No compromise over Pedra Branca
1. Politicians in Malaysia and Singapore have exhibited passive-aggressive tendencies. In 2018, Rais Hussin, a supreme council member of Bersatu, the Mahathir-led party that is part of Pakatan Harapan,
wrote an Op-Ed that combined a conciliatory call for cooler heads with a bald-faced threat that Singapore was at risk of “pain by a thousand cuts”. Given that the ICJ delivered its judgment on Pedra Branca (or called Batu Puteh by M’sia) on 23 May 2008, it is a lie to claim sovereignty was lost when the Dr Mahathir Mohamad led Pakatan Harapan/Bersatu was in power. The case:
(a) was lost when UMNO & BN was in power; and
(b) can no longer be challenged due to Article 61(5) of the ICJ Statute which states: “No application for revision may be made after the lapse of ten years from the date of the judgment.”
2. Malaysian PM Anwar said his Govt will also ask that "related consequences" are studied again so there can be more "meaningful and immediate" discussions with Singapore. This is to ensure there are no problems in the relationship between the two "friendly" countries, he added.
(a) In Oct 2022, then PM Ismail Sabri Yaakob, as reported by
Bernama, said that his cabinet was to proceed with legal action at the ICJ over a number of islands including Pedra Branca. Singapore's Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA)
responded that Singapore stood ready to "robustly defend" its sovereignty over the island. We should speak clearly — most Singaporeans will no longer tolerate any Malaysian attempt to politicise Pedra Branca as an issue, given Singapore’s legal victory at ICJ — its is no longer disputed waters.
(b) Some claim that Singaporeans should not talk frankly about dangers facing Malaysia, over their continued and illogical claims over a redline, Pedra Branca or future attempts to intrude into our port waters (like they did between Dec 2018 to Apr 2019) — that Singapore will fight to protect our soverignty — so as not to frighten our friends in Malaysia.
(c) If the Malaysians at a Federal Govt level, on 9-11 are testing our fighter scramble response timing, by using a helicopter to intrude over the air space over Pulau Tekong, a Singapore Army BMT facility:
Q: Are they hostile?
To avoid any misunderstanding PM Lee Hsien Loong, has invited PM Anwar Ibrahim to lead a delegation for a visit to Singapore, soonest.
3. IMO, fear can be a powerful Malaysian motivator and it is a very reasonable reaction, if hostilities should occur in the South China Sea over Malaysia’s oil & gas platforms there, especially when the Malaysians face-off with the PLA(N). Malaysia is in trouble and must lead in its own defence over its EEZ disputes in the South China Sea and in its security concerns over Sabah.
(a) Hopefully, more Malaysians will be as pragmatic as the Royal family in Johor, about maintaining good relations with Singapore — instead of acting to harm ties, like Osman bin Sapian or Dr M. Keeping in mind that on 9 Jan 2019, Osman bin Sapian supporting the antics of PM Dr Mahathir Mohamad, boarded the Malaysian Marine Department vessel Pedoman (anchored illegally in Singapore’s territorial waters off Tuas), in an attempt to derail the bilateral efforts to defuse the dispute in a calm & constructive manner.
(b) In view of the physical changes at both Whitsun Reef and Sandy Cay (that affect the Philippines and Vietnam, more) and on 31 May 2021, a 16 Chinese aircraft formation was detected by Air Defense Center (CRC 2) in Sarawak at 1153hrs, there should be some concern. These Chinese military aircraft caused Malaysia to summon China's ambassador after these 16 aircraft flew over disputed waters (off the eastern state of Sarawak). Given China’s willingness to use coercion against India (via border incidents), I would not be surprised if Malaysia is subject to the same in future.
(c) Singapore should be clear about its interest to keep the peace, no matter how much Malaysian interests it needs to surrender to China. Singapore should stand ready to veto any attempt by FPDA to pivot to South China Sea issues — we should not defend Malaysia, while they remain hostile to us (as was demonstrated from Dec 2018 to Apr 2019 & again on Sept 11, 2021). Hopefully, a new Govt in Malaysia will see a change in policy towards Singapore.
4. NDP 2022 – Highlights by Tedd Jong, show us how Singapore can be stronger together.
5. At the recent UN HR vote to condemn China’s treatment of Uyghurs in Xinjiang, Malaysia abstains, while Indonesia votes against — showing the pan-Islamic solidarity is a farce in the face of China’s rising socio-economic power. During the 1990s:
(a) Iranian officials and Hezbollah operatives were active in Malaysia, recruiting agents, fundraising, and planning attacks — a period where Singapore’s disputes with Malaysia escalated & moved into the grey zone — which reached its various high points in 1991, 1998, and 2018, as documented periods of troubled peace between Malaysia and Singapore.
(b) There is no dispute that an act of terrorism in Malaysia resulted in the hijacking of SQ117 and the subsequent hostage rescue by Singaporean special forces on 26 Mar 1991. Some of this covert or grey zone activity patterns may have continued. Certainly, Palestinian ‘students’ sent to Malaysia by Hamas for cyberwarfare training will increasingly be physically targeted by foreign intelligence agencies due to M’sian Govt policies.
6. On 21 April 2018, Fadi Mohammad al-Batsh, a Hamas rocket scientist was assassinated, allegedly by Israeli agents, in Kuala Lumpur. An unnamed Western intelligence source said that Malaysia had once again ‘become a hub for Iranian activity.’ Given that:
(a) then Defense Minister, Mat Sabu went to Iran for a visit to upgrade bilateral military ties with Iran (who is in Anwar’s cabinet in another portfolio); and
(b) then PM Mahathir Mohamad hosted Iranian President Hassan Rouhani in KL, and has complained that U.S. sanctions against Iran,
Singapore must review its bilateral military-to-military ties with Malaysia to avoid collateral damage with the Americans and Australians — should the newly elected, PM Anwar Ibrahim’s govt continue down the path taken by the former PMs (aka Mahathir Mohamad & Ismail Sabri) of supporting Hamas or closing one-eye to Hezbollah’s activities in Malaysia (used as a staging ground for terror attacks in Thailand).