I vaguely recall reading one major section was floated from Russia to France to be completed because the Russian yards weren't capable of doing the work up to scratch in the given time.
In time, and in price limits, certainly not. In principle, maybe.I vaguely recall reading one major section was floated from Russia to France to be completed because the Russian yards weren't capable of doing the work up to scratch in the given time.
By whom? NATO, well yes. But then there's the nuclear stick. Which is the only way Russia can handle NATO. Mistrals or no Mistrals. Everyone else though? Not so easy. Especially not if they're properly escorted. For example, could Ukraine or Georgia easily eliminate a Mistral? I doubt it. Ukrainian coastal missile units are in shambles, maritime strike capability is non-existent, and aerial recon is extremely limited, for example. And of course I don't see Somalian pirates doing much to a Mistral. This about summs up the roster of maritime threats Russia is realistically going to handle with these sorts of means.Let's be really cynical and observe that if the Russians want to put money into assets which can be tracked and terminated easily..let them..
You could say the same for Australia, France, the US, or basically anyone who operates this type of vessel.Let's be really cynical and observe that if the Russians want to put money into assets which can be tracked and terminated easily..let them..
I don't know about additional threat in principle but it does make it easier for Russia to do the things it does. As Russian command stated, they could have completed their amphibious operations in the Georgian war much much easier had they a Mistral. This is not to say that the outcome would have changed.I was referring to the uproar over the French selling them on - they're no threat to a NATO allied country is my point. They're no real additional threat to any country they could approach with impunity - if the Russians are in a position to use a Mistral in an amphib role, they likely have superiority in the air and sea I'd be guessing.
At last, Russia's first Project 636! A great moment for the Black Sea Fleet!The first Varshavyanka-class submarine was formally accepted by the Russian navy. It will be assigned to the BSF. The second one is to follow by the end of this year.
Ãîñêîìèññèÿ ïðèíÿëà ïîäëîäêó "Íîâîðîññèéñê"
Thanks for sharing the link, still a good looking ship.The project 956 Rastoporniy has been pulled out of long term dock, and is being taken somewhere. It's unclear whether it will be cut up for scrap or modernized.
kuleshovoleg:
The cannon for the first Gorshkov has just arrived, so we may see this long term project finally reach a serial production status. There is the engine question though, since Zarya has suspended deliveries on Russian MoD contracts and Saturn is years away from producing something comparable.Thanks for sharing the link, still a good looking ship.
Decommissioned 5 years ago in 2009 wasn't it?
Many project 956s are already retired and as far as i know none of them are modernized. So its likely that it will be scrapped.....
Its time that the Admiral Gorshkov-class frigates will entering service!
Isnt Zarya in Mariupol?... They may still get those engines depending on the settlment conditions with DPR.The cannon for the first Gorshkov has just arrived, so we may see this long term project finally reach a serial production status. There is the engine question though, since Zarya has suspended deliveries on Russian MoD contracts and Saturn is years away from producing something comparable.