The other reason is that the An-70 program is encountering delays.ruaviation.com reports that the Russian Air Force's six remaining An-22 Antei transport aircraft will be overhauled to keep them in service until 2020.
The main reason for this is that currently there are not enough An-124 Ruslan available to carry out all necessary flights.
It would be easier to modify a number of existing MiG-31s (there's a ton of surplus aircraft) with upgraded recon gear, to give then capabilities beyond those of the MiG-25s.Is it possible to modify and fit the remaning MiG-25 with MiG-31 engines?
They don't have any UAVs that can fill the role.Would of thought that they would be focusing on UAV's to take the role of the MiG-25 ECR aircraft, which are very dated...
On the long term time line they are focusing on UAV's, but as Feanor says, its still too little and too late on that area..Would of thought that they would be focusing on UAV's to take the role of the MiG-25 ECR aircraft, which are very dated...
I suspect stores of spares exist that would make it possible to keep the existing birds flying. The new sensors might be in the form of making them compatible with the recon pods being developed for the Su-34. That would make a lot of sense, and be fairly cost efficient, given that it will be some time before the Su-34 is present in such numbers that it can fly strike, EW, and recon missions.But i still question the cost effectivness of putting those Mig-25MR back in operational service.
Well what about the 24 hour endurance Dozor-600 UAV? Or it was rejected by the MoD?They don't have any UAVs that can fill the role.
Did it participate in the state trials? The ones that every single participant failed?Well what about the 24 hour endurance Dozor-600 UAV? Or it was rejected by the MoD?
The current VVS variant replaces nothing. It's added into S-300/400 units. The Land Forces variant will probably eventually replace both.Which existing systems will be replaced by the Pantsyr? Only the ZSU-23 or also the Tunguska?