Ananda
The Bunker Group
First of all, this comparison debate coming after you say in your post that China and Russia future relationship will be like a "vassal" relationship. Which is quite baseless considering they are both much more in equal footing even in future, relative compare to US and much or the rest in collective west grouping.
China is much more 'rough' on their international diplomatic approach. Much rest of Asia knows that. However there are ways to negotiate with China. Which much of Asia knows also the approach will not be same with US.
Second of all, relationship govern by mutual benefits, but don't talk that size is not matter in the real world. Size does matter, and the big boys will always know how to play the tune toward their benefits. The matter is whether subtle or more direct.
Note: Norway-China vs Norway-US, I'm sorry it is can not be compare as relationship comparison. Norway is not Chinese allies, and China see the move from Nobel Committe as part of Western establishment try to meddle on Chinese internal affairs. Off course China react differently toward Norway compare US moves.
Like I said in my post, non US Western opinion will be offended if US and The Rest of Collective West relationship being call Master and Vassal. Then why Chinese and Russian relationship consider can be a vassal relationship? When in reality they are always more in equal footing relative compare toward US and the rest of Collective West.
If you don't like US and The Rest of Collective West unequal footing relationship (at least on Geopolitical power bargain), as Master and Vassal. Then don't judgement Russia and China or even others in opposite Collective West will be on Master-Vassal relationship.
On contrary they have more chances to be in equalisation relationship due to collective west push.
China is much more 'rough' on their international diplomatic approach. Much rest of Asia knows that. However there are ways to negotiate with China. Which much of Asia knows also the approach will not be same with US.
However US also playing 'bully' if they need be to do. At least much of Asia knows that during decades of their relationship with US. US just doing more subtle way with combinations from different angles on economics, business and diplomatics. Will US will not react if Noble Committe give nobel price toward anti zionist middle east champion in future, as an example ? (Not a kind of joint noble peace price for both Israel and Palestinians). US that always actively tone down anti zionist movement as racist one. I'm sure US will behave differently if that happen.cannot imagine a similar situation where the US would treat Norway like that.
Second of all, relationship govern by mutual benefits, but don't talk that size is not matter in the real world. Size does matter, and the big boys will always know how to play the tune toward their benefits. The matter is whether subtle or more direct.
Note: Norway-China vs Norway-US, I'm sorry it is can not be compare as relationship comparison. Norway is not Chinese allies, and China see the move from Nobel Committe as part of Western establishment try to meddle on Chinese internal affairs. Off course China react differently toward Norway compare US moves.
Like I said in my post, non US Western opinion will be offended if US and The Rest of Collective West relationship being call Master and Vassal. Then why Chinese and Russian relationship consider can be a vassal relationship? When in reality they are always more in equal footing relative compare toward US and the rest of Collective West.
If you don't like US and The Rest of Collective West unequal footing relationship (at least on Geopolitical power bargain), as Master and Vassal. Then don't judgement Russia and China or even others in opposite Collective West will be on Master-Vassal relationship.
On contrary they have more chances to be in equalisation relationship due to collective west push.