Indeed; it's incorrect and IMO self serving. ASEAN [which is far from flawless] may not be as homogeneous and united as the EU but on some issues it has taken a clear stand and has done what it can; irrespective of the fact that it may not have solved anything. The stand of certain countries [Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia] regarding Myanmar had the danger of creating a rift within ASEAN and Malaysia's criticism of Myanmar over the Rohingya issue some years ago did not go well with other members. Another issue is that unlike the EU; ASEAN is not in the business of preaching human rights and democracy to others; it has its own issues to focus on.
The statement by the Indian Foreign Minister was his personal opinion and indicative that Asian countries may not appreciate the way the EU preaches certain things and expects others to follow - ''
that Europe should grow out of the mindset that its problems are the world’s problems' The world cannot be that Eurocentric that it used to be in the past''. I fail to see how it was ''
negative'' unless of course one is under the impression that the EU/Europeans are beyond reproach/criticism.
I also posted comments attributed to the Kazakhs which were totally unexpected and would have deeply annoyed the Russians. That was not viewed as ''
negative'' by others; probably because it referenced the Russians not the EU/Europeans.
Russia has accused Kazakhstan of ignoring "Russophobic activity", raising fears that the Kremlin may turn against the nation after its war in Ukraine.
uk.yahoo.com
''
Kazakhstan and Russia share the world's longest continuous land border and have been regarded as staunch allies, but Russia's invasion of Ukraine has fractured this alliance. Earlier this month, during a televised press conference, Kassym Jomart Tokayev, the Kazakh president, embarrassed Vladimir Putin during the final session of an economic forum by explaining that he did not support the independence of pro-Russia regions in Donbas.''