I am also puzzled about your one-sided focus on the Russian "threat perception
I'm.equally puzzled that you refuse or are unable to understand or acknowledge that the Russians too have threat perceptions and that they - rightly or wrongly - view things differently. Yet you speak about me being ''one sided''? It word be nice and convenient if the Russians followed your narrative but they don't.
I also don't buy the idea that more countries joining NATO will deter Russia. You apparently.do and that's fine.
We have the evidence of what happens to countries that are not NATO members, in particular Ukraine. Had Ukraine been NATO member, they would not have been invaded. Had Russia not acted aggressively against Ukraine for many years, NATO would not have been considered an option by most Ukrainians
Yes, yes, so you keep saying. You've done a fine job explaining the NATO narrative over and over again. I.get the picture.
It puzzles me that you seriously suggest that Eastern European countries should have been forced to stay out NATO in spite of their well founded fear of Russia
It" puzzles" me that despite many debares/discussions you still haven't grasped the point I'm driving at... It also puzzles me that your're claiming I mentioned things which I never did. That's us both ''puzzled'' then.
BTW I'm not pro Russian; neither am I pro Western/European/NATO but I find it inconceivable that anyone would dismiss the very notion that NATO's steady expansion over the years wouldn't have unsettled Russia; irrespective of the fact that NATO had no intention to attack Russia. As far back as the 1990's the Russians had warned that NATO's expansion would create issues.
Why has Russia’s President Vladimir Putin become so aggressive in his attitude to the US, NATO and Ukraine? In this article, I begin by examining the disintegration of the former Soviet Union and how it ...
www.aspistrategist.org.au
Can you please present evidence of "NATO aggression" against Russia?
Can you please point out where I spoke about ''NATO aggression" against Russia''? When and where? I spoke about threat perceptions and key interests; about Russia seeing things differently and about the need for both sides to make certain compromises but "NATO aggression" against Russia?
I it seems you do not consider how European countries bordering Russia are looking at it
From where I'm sitting it seems that you do not consider how Russia which borders NATO countries are looking at it. Is it only the European countries which have perspectives on things? BTW this is discussion on geo politics; not on morality or who's right or wrong...
So had the Baltics been outside of NATO, Russia may well had decided to go for the Baltics first, even before Ukraine.
Is that a personal opinion or an absolute fact?
I agree that the NATO membership is essential to protecting the Baltics from Russia..
I'm sure you would agree. On my part for reasons I've given I don't think Russia would make a go for the Baltics. There are various reasons why it would but also why it wouldn't.
As it stands even if Russia was intent on eventually going for the Baltics and war with NATO; current events means that it's not likely to happen anytime soon and the Russians will need a lot of resources and time to rectify various weaknesses with the military in order to go head to head against NATO.