40 deg south
Well-Known Member
CAMM successful qualification trials from 3-cell EXLS launcherWith the RNZN going with Sea Ceptor, the replacement of the Mk 41 VLS for something smaller and light makes sense IMO. Where the questions concerns remain is whether the size of the new VLS (and number of cells/missiles) will be realistically sufficient should the RNZN end up needing to escort vessels into or through a hostile environment, or deploy a frigate to such an area.
With the RN Mk 23's having the 4 x 8 layout, that suggests the Sea Ceptor VLS configuration comes in units of 4 cells, so a 4 x 5 layout for the RNZN should be possible, though I would be happier with the frigates also having a 4 x 8 layout.
This report from Navy Recognition (merci, Xav!) is timely, if not terribly clear. It is reporting on two variants of a Lockheed Martin launching system for SeaCeptor. One quad-lacks SC into a Mk41 VLS, while the other is reported as a stand-alone three-cell launcher. The picture caption suggests that the three-cell launcher is quad-packed, making it really a 12-cell launcher. I'm unclear if that is really the case or not, and am interested in how those more knowledgeable than me interpret it. Given LockMart Canada is carrying out the NZ ANZAC upgrade, it is a fair bet we will end up with this system.