Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates

Status
Not open for further replies.
It kinda went like this.... if my understanding is correct

ammunition was stored in Sydney, but the Navy realised they could make a lot of money by selling the land where all this was stored. It might have not met the modern NATO ammuntion storage requirements too,

The idea was to move the ships and the ammunition down to Jervis Bay. Once that got shelved they then had to put the new ammuntion store and wharf somewhere, so they chose Eden (twofold bay)

I was told that before they can do maintenance on a ship they have to remove the ammunition, it is apparently a safety thing. The problem with the ships is Sydney and the ammunition wharf down in Eden, is that if ships are about to undergo maintenance, they have to sail down to Eden, unload their ammuntion then sail back to Sydney to get work done. Hence why Jervis Bay was desriable in that in theory it was all close togehter. It would save a heap of time in sailing back and forth.

It was late 1980s when the jervis bay thing was knocked back, thus I guess the TwoFold Bay facility was built in the early 1990s.

Just a litte aside, the Navy pronounces Jervis Bay as Jarvis Bay, EVERYONE in the local area pronounces it Jervis Bay. (I spent the first 18 years on my life in Nowra).

A couple mroe little anecdotes,
Years ago when we still had skyhawks they were used by the Navy to undertake simulated attacks on Navy ships as a way of calibrating their radar. This was then replaced by a 'cheaper' contractor flying Lear Jets. The thing was that the Lear Jets could not handle the G forces that the Skyhawks could. How this affected the radar calibration I dont know.

After the Jindavicks were retired (a target drone aircraft - it towed the target), the Navy bought this system from America. The idea was at first to use the same airstrip as the Jindavicks used to use. The trouble was that this new drone had a couple of jettisonable rockets to get it up to speed, , and these rockets were likely to drop of in the bush and start lighting fires.

I dont know, but the story was that they then moved the drones to flying off the cliffs at either Beecroft (higher cliffs there) or on the Southern peninsula, thus the rockets would fall into the sea.

By the way at Beecroft right behind the cliffs there is a small helicopter hangar and a landing pad, It had a roof but is open at the ends. Not sure what it is used for, I guess it is useful in an emergeny as being a few km closer than another pad if a helicopter is coming in from the Sea. There is also a lot of unexploded shells around there. You are free to walk around Beecroft when teh Navy is not doing shore bombardment exercises (they close the gate when they do their shelling,,, which seems like a very good idea). I have zero idea if they are filled with high explosive, but there are certainly a lot of them, (look like 5 inch shells) and in no way was I going within ten feet of them.
 

icelord

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
I was told that before they can do maintenance on a ship they have to remove the ammunition, it is apparently a safety thing. The problem with the ships is Sydney and the ammunition wharf down in Eden, is that if ships are about to undergo maintenance, they have to sail down to Eden, unload their ammuntion then sail back to Sydney to get work done. Hence why Jervis Bay was desriable in that in theory it was all close togehter. It would save a heap of time in sailing back and forth.
We did 6months away in middle east deployment, come back via Qld, and had to sail by sydney and down to eden to de ammo...we could have been home 2 frigging days early if not for the positioning for having it in eden...so so annoying having to do this after 6mths away from home
 

AMTP10E

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
We did 6months away in middle east deployment, come back via Qld, and had to sail by sydney and down to eden to de ammo...we could have been home 2 frigging days early if not for the positioning for having it in eden...so so annoying having to do this after 6mths away from home
You should have come via Adelaide. You could have done a shoot-ex, emptied your mags on the place and done a couple of $million in "urban redevelopment". :ar15
 

icelord

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
You should have come via Adelaide. You could have done a shoot-ex, emptied your mags on the place and done a couple of $million in "urban redevelopment". :ar15
Was kinda hoping after spending a day loading missiles, 7.62, 5.56 and enough 5inch to create a beach off any cliff face, that we could unload it on somalian pirates...instead i got paid to sit around in the heat with no air con getting told we were doing an important job for our country, and not helping the ships command team get promoted or flying the flag from the corner of the action...:rolleyes:
 

AMTP10E

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
To the P&O terminal is 5 hours from the start of moreton bay.

The channel is 2.5 hours of Mod specials for ships, then 30 mins for breakfast(this is arrival time of 1000hrs, followed by back in for specials from the start of the wharfs all the way along the river for around 2hours, depending on other ship movements and tug availabilty.
If we moved ships up there we'd have entire executive departments (from the CO down to the SMNBM on the anchor party) running for the exits.
 

AMTP10E

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
Was kinda hoping after spending a day loading missiles, 7.62, 5.56 and enough 5inch to create a beach off any cliff face, that we could unload it on somalian pirates...
If you wanted that then you should have learned Russian and cross decked.

Us western types are so touchy-feely that if you want to fire your guns at the pirates you'd better be shooting refugee visas to them.
 

Volkodav

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
If you wanted that then you should have learned Russian and cross decked.

Us western types are so touchy-feely that if you want to fire your guns at the pirates you'd better be shooting refugee visas to them.
Heard a story a while back about a Russian being kidnapped in Lebanon during the 80s, he was returned unharmed a day or so after multiple family members of those involved were abducted, dismembered and returned, each in several boxes. For some strange reason no more Russians were taken after that.
 

AMTP10E

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
Bad experience last visit by any chance?
Melbourne is proof that Tasmanians can swim.

Adelaide is proof that not all of them can swim in a straight line.

Setting aside the wineries, Adelaide just left me feeling flat and I had the feeling that Douglas Adams had Adelaide in mind when he described NowWhat (except he added rain).
 

Volkodav

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
Melbourne is proof that Tasmanians can swim.

Adelaide is proof that not all of them can swim in a straight line.

Setting aside the wineries, Adelaide just left me feeling flat and I had the feeling that Douglas Adams had Adelaide in mind when he described NowWhat (except he added rain).
Not a bad place to live if you have high fences and big dogs to keep the psycos away (they prefer soft targets). I notice that RAN ship visits seem to be using Tech Port these days instead of Outer Harbour or Port Adelaide. Fine for now but will get very crowded from 2014.
 

Abraham Gubler

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
We did 6months away in middle east deployment, come back via Qld, and had to sail by sydney and down to eden to de ammo...we could have been home 2 frigging days early if not for the positioning for having it in eden...so so annoying having to do this after 6mths away from home
Which is entirely for political reasons. The new ammo depot was built at Twofolds rather than Jervis so it could be in Jim Snow's electorate of Eden-Monaro. The electorate of Gilmore (including Jervis Bay) is a pretty safe conservative seat even though Labor held it from 93-96 this was mostly because the Nationals and Liberals both contested it (it went from a National seat before 93 to a Liberal seat after 96).

But before anyone cries foul over Labor putting a defence facility in Eden-Monaro when it would be better off somewhere else it’s also something the conservatives did in bulk as well. HQ JOC is in Eden-Monaro even though the ADF wanted it at RAAF Glenbrook in the Greater Sydney lower Blue Mountains. Porking Eden-Monaro appears to be a national pastime of all political persuasions. An (un)fortunate by-product of its legendary status as a “bell-weather” seat status.

Going back to the original topic about Garden island I thought it was amusing that the article in question was talking about the $1 billion in revenue that civil access would bring. What do they think the Navy does for the Sydney economy? Plus are they going to offset that billion with the cost of relocating the Navy?

In the long run but it is inevitable that the Navy will have to leave Garden Island. Port Jackson’s days as a working harbour are numbered. The best harbour in the world will eventually be just for play and enjoyment of the populous (who can afford it). Moving Fleet Base East to Jervis Bay will be a great boon for the Navy. A green fields base with lots of room, cheap housing, quick access to training areas, integration with a range of other facilities (even a new ammo depot) will be a great improvement for the Navy. They can even build a New Kings Cross in Nowra to make everyone happy. But obviously it’s going to cost a lot of money and involve cracking some NIMBY political eggs which like the second Sydney Airport at Badgerys’s Creek will mean it will probably never happen.
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
HQ JOC is in Eden-Monaro even though the ADF wanted it at RAAF Glenbrook in the Greater Sydney lower Blue Mountains. Porking Eden-Monaro appears to be a national pastime of all political persuasions. An (un)fortunate by-product of its legendary status as a “bell-weather” seat status.
The current B1 wasn't even on the shortlist... no political influence there at all - no sireee. :)

ditto for Bushmaster at Ballarat, when I was working for CT we were told that it was going to be deselected within 30 days, again, Ballarat was identified as a critical seat due to number of job losses tied in with closure and hey presto, it did a lazarus.

Fortunately Bushmaster was a stable design anyway - but kind of funny when you consider that Taipan was considered in some evals as "too safe" and might inject unnecessary bravado into the occupants that it could go anywhere.
 

Pusser01

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
It kinda went like this.... if my understanding is correct

ammunition was stored in Sydney, but the Navy realised they could make a lot of money by selling the land where all this was stored. It might have not met the modern NATO ammuntion storage requirements too,

The idea was to move the ships and the ammunition down to Jervis Bay. Once that got shelved they then had to put the new ammuntion store and wharf somewhere, so they chose Eden (twofold bay)

I was told that before they can do maintenance on a ship they have to remove the ammunition, it is apparently a safety thing. The problem with the ships is Sydney and the ammunition wharf down in Eden, is that if ships are about to undergo maintenance, they have to sail down to Eden, unload their ammuntion then sail back to Sydney to get work done. Hence why Jervis Bay was desriable in that in theory it was all close togehter. It would save a heap of time in sailing back and forth.

It was late 1980s when the jervis bay thing was knocked back, thus I guess the TwoFold Bay facility was built in the early 1990s.
The Eden ammo wharf was opened in 2002. The Navy stopped ammunitioning in Sydney in the late 90's due to safety concerns. For the next few years until Eden was built, east coast ships had to ammuntion at Wilson Point in Geelong, now that was a long way to go.
Cheers
 

t68

Well-Known Member
The Eden ammo wharf was opened in 2002. The Navy stopped ammunitioning in Sydney in the late 90's due to safety concerns. For the next few years until Eden was built, east coast ships had to ammuntion at Wilson Point in Geelong, now that was a long way to go.
Cheers
Yeah I remember that one when I worked for DAS, had to reverse all the way done the wharf, took my rod a couple off times then spent the night at little river pub good times.
 

ASSAIL

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
Chowder Bay/Rose Bay

Along the same line as the above posts;

The political pressures on Naval facilities within Port Jackson are obviously growing. Has there been any change in status of either the refuelling facility at Chowder Bay or the de-gaussing range in Rose Bay or conversely, any genuine political attempt to close them?
 

icelord

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian

Yay, new waste of taxpayers money for political purposes...i really, really dont like the whole contracting ships like this. Buy a military designed ship, or not at all. The legalities of sending the ships to overseas situations which will require it dont add up. Can we use this vessel for picking up our gear from MEAO once we withdraw from afghanistan...unlikely.
Then if we want it to go on station off Fiji for another coup, or anywhere else in the pacific region as Choules is in dock or overseas already committed, what can we do if the Unions dont agree with the deployment, this utilisation is so vague that planning for its use will be minimal and pointless. Bravo Defmin, you made another stupid decision that hopefully will bite you on the rear.

And the only option for a new naval vessel was pushed aside, although debated previously to no end in this thread ( so by all means, DO NOT start again for reasoning of a cat ) it beats the alternative as its crewed by serving defence members
Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian
 

SASWanabe

Member
IIRC the greeks have 5 ~4,500 ton LSTs i think theyre 10-15 years old. they would make a good gap filler.

god knows they could use the money.
 

Tasman

Ship Watcher
Verified Defense Pro
Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian

Yay, new waste of taxpayers money for political purposes...i really, really dont like the whole contracting ships like this. Buy a military designed ship, or not at all. The legalities of sending the ships to overseas situations which will require it dont add up. Can we use this vessel for picking up our gear from MEAO once we withdraw from afghanistan...unlikely.
Then if we want it to go on station off Fiji for another coup, or anywhere else in the pacific region as Choules is in dock or overseas already committed, what can we do if the Unions dont agree with the deployment, this utilisation is so vague that planning for its use will be minimal and pointless. Bravo Defmin, you made another stupid decision that hopefully will bite you on the rear.

And the only option for a new naval vessel was pushed aside, although debated previously to no end in this thread ( so by all means, DO NOT start again for reasoning of a cat ) it beats the alternative as its crewed by serving defence members
Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian
I would also prefer to see the ship commissioned in the RAN. If Australia is going to go down the road of civilian crewing for a ship that could be required in a hot spot I think it needs to look at setting up something along the lines of the RFA and any crew taken on would need to agree to serving anywhere required to support the ADF. IIRC Jeparit was commissioned during the Vietnam War when the Seamen's Union refused to crew it with the master being given a commission as a Commander in the RANR.

Unless the Minister is really only interested in the ship being available for disaster relief and he doesn't see a need for it as a potential war asset it is important IMO that clear rules and protocols are put in place so that its deployment cannot be held to ransom by a union.

Tas
 

Abraham Gubler

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
Skandi Bergen will only be in ADF service for around 18 months until HMAS Canberra is commissioned then it is off to Customs to replace the leased Oceanic Protector. One problem with commissioning the ship is the RAN might not let it go… Part of the funding case of the purchase is that the ship will offset future ship leases for the Customs ship. The other argument is political and further positions for Australian merchant sailors supports the Gillard Government’s push to Australianise coastal shipping. Of course it might not work… and we might have a HMAS Skandi Bergen which should displace HMAS Lolita as the dumbest name in RAN history.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top