While I believe the Cocos Keeling islands may provide some benefits for FBW Christmas island not at all. The former has safe harbour but limited land area while the latter has plenty of land but zero harbour and no ability to build such a harbour as the island for all intents is a mountain in the ocean. No place around it to build up any sort of break wall for a harbour otherwise would have already been done while what limited shipping they get depends heavily on the weather as to what side of the island is used. Only time Christmas island will come into use for the ADF is when the zombies arrive and a safe location is needed .Is a lack of deep water access likely to be a problem for submarines operating out of Lombrum when the new base is complete? The Bismarck Sea is relatively shallow isn't it? I had assumed that one of the major reasons for the upgrade was to reduce transit times to and from the SCS and the central pacific for the Attacks. Otherwise its a long cruise back to FBE and a consequent reduction in availability.
I've also assumed similar use for subs based at FBW for Christmas Is. or Cocos / Keeling. This is very convenient when we want to influence the traffic through the Sunda & Malacca straits, or to deter action against the north west shelf. No shortage of deep water in the Indian Ocean though.
Or do I have the wrong end of the stick?
As to the Bismarck sea it's actually a lot deeper then you think. i-Boating : Free Marine Navigation Charts & Fishing Maps
Have a look at that to get an idea. Much of it is over 1,000m in depth.