Yeh, AI is both terrible and hilarious. I find it interesting to mock up images.Stingray, where did you find that image? It's awesome.
Looking into the playschool window of what ifs..
Anyone keeping track of the F110 Flight II?
I presume this is what Spain was really offering when they offered us to build more Hobart destroyers.
| Hobart class, upgraded | F110 Flight II / IAMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Full-load displacement | ~7,000 t | ~6,700 t |
| Length | 146.7 m | ~150 m |
| Beam | 18.6 m | 18.6 m |
| Speed | 28+ kt | >29 kt |
| Published range | 4,500 nmi @ 18 kt | ~4,100 nmi @ 15 kt |
| Crew | ~180 nominal | ~170 + 37 mission/command |
| Main VLS | 48 × Mk 41 Strike Length | 48 × Strike + 16 × Tactical = 64 |
| Main radar | AN/SPY-1D(V) | AN/SPY-7(V)2, 100 SAS/face |
| Combat system | Full Aegis Baseline 9 + Australian Interface | SCOMBA + Aegis IAFCL + CEC |
| Area AAW | SM-2 IIIC, SM-6 | SM-2; ESSM; other integration possible |
| Land strike | Tomahawk integrated | Strike-length cells physically suitable, but Tomahawk integration not announced |
| Anti-ship | 8 × NSM | 8 × NSM |
| ASW sonar | Hull + towed-array system | BlueMaster + CAPTAS-4 Compact VDS |
| Propulsion | CODOG | quiet CODLAG |
| Helicopter | MH-60R | MH-60R/NH90 |
| Main gun | Mk 45 Mod 4 127 mm | OTO 127/64 LW |
| Close defence | Phalanx + Nulka + ESSM | 30-mm systems + ESSM + decoys; DEW/C-UAS planned |
| Mission bay | Limited | Dedicated multi-mission space |
I like hunter and mogami. But we have only 3 Destroyers and will continue to do so for a long, long time. But man, that would have been nice to have 2-3 of these. 64 VLS, essentially same layout and systems as Hobart in a similar evolved hull.
I feel if we had gone with that not only would we have things coming to the fleet right now as we are decommissioning ships, but the capabilities would have been welcomed.
We would be getting our first ship next year.