Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0

M

Morgo

Well-Known Member
spoz said:
People, these are issues concering the USN. Could we please take the discussion to the thread devoted to that organisation (where it is already, to so extent, going on). This is the RAN thread
Click to expand...
To be fair - if the USN actually makes a bulk buy of Mogamis - Henderson suddenly becomes part of a much bigger supply chain ecosystem, and if done properly the unit cost of a Mogami should plummet.

No doubt we would still find some way to mess it up.
 
I

iambuzzard

Well-Known Member
Morgo said:
To be fair - if the USN actually makes a bulk buy of Mogamis - Henderson suddenly becomes part of a much bigger supply chain ecosystem, and if done properly the unit cost of a Mogami should plummet.

No doubt we would still find some way to mess it up.
Click to expand...
Yeah, we have a track record of making a sow's ear out of a silk purse.
 
V

Volkodav

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
What we need to avoid doing is moving stuff off overseas just as our new infrastucture and workforce comes on line.

Osborne was hitting its stride when it was hit with a blackhole that caused many of the workforce issues with Hunter, we will have the same issues in the west.

Pollies and journos are looking backwards, not forwards. We need to make decisiins based on the future not the past as every change in direction, every backtrack, every time we percist with already failed concepts, we increade cost and blow the schedule.
 
S

Stampede

Well-Known Member
Reptilia said:
Current government imo seems to be doing a good job with Defence.
Click to expand...
To be fair for this Navy thread they are implementing a new class of ships in the Mogami plus pursing the original SSN script.
( The later I have reservations, but that’s my personal opinion)
Hobart upgrades and new missiles for the RAN
So yes some positive movement.
I do have reservations that survey and MCM ships are not being replaced
The unmanned stuff will need a manned mother ship and clever technology always has to go on a manned something.
Preferably a dedicated ship.

Navy will still need large ships ;so it concerns me HMAS Choules will not be replaced and that Navy for there intended bigger fleet will have just two supply ships.
Army’s intended LCM and LCH should be a complement not a replacement for big ships.

The intended multipurpose vessel had merit but my preference was an extra LHD and Supply Class
Really not big dollars but a great return for capital spent
Rule of three
LHDs will in part morph into drone carriers and we should capitalise on that space
Fortuitously, we already have two excellent ships in the Canberra class.
As for the patrol boat fleet, they really need a bit more clout than what they currently possess?

Add to the list some light weight add ons in the form of small UAV s , attack drones , SHORAD , plus ensure all the major ships have SEARAM.
Greatest threat in our time and all!!!!

So some good stuff but also a lot of gaps that need filling for a balanced fleet both now and as it grows.
Governments score card
A pass

But probably just 5 out of 10
And yes I voted for them!

Cheers S
 
I

iambuzzard

Well-Known Member
Stampede said:
To be fair for this Navy thread they are implementing a new class of ships in the Mogami plus pursing the original SSN script.
( The later I have reservations, but that’s my personal opinion)
Hobart upgrades and new missiles for the RAN
So yes some positive movement.
I do have reservations that survey and MCM ships are not being replaced
The unmanned stuff will need a manned mother ship and clever technology always has to go on a manned something.
Preferably a dedicated ship.

Navy will still need large ships ;so it concerns me HMAS Choules will not be replaced and that Navy for there intended bigger fleet will have just two supply ships.
Army’s intended LCM and LCH should be a complement not a replacement for big ships.

The intended multipurpose vessel had merit but my preference was an extra LHD and Supply Class
Really not big dollars but a great return for capital spent
Rule of three
LHDs will in part morph into drone carriers and we should capitalise on that space
Fortuitously, we already have two excellent ships in the Canberra class.
As for the patrol boat fleet, they really need a bit more clout than what they currently possess?

Add to the list some light weight add ons in the form of small UAV s , attack drones , SHORAD , plus ensure all the major ships have SEARAM.
Greatest threat in our time and all!!!!

So some good stuff but also a lot of gaps that need filling for a balanced fleet both now and as it grows.
Governments score card
A pass

But probably just 5 out of 10
And yes I voted for them!

Cheers S
Click to expand...
I didn't vote for them but concede some good decisions have been made and there are gaps. As long as outside interference from a Victorian advising the PM doesn't screw it up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top