Redesigned JF-17 prototype revealed at Beijing Airshow

Oqaab

New Member
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

kashifshahzad said:
And also ApsideA2A missile i have seen this name in the weapons which thunder will use i cant find any specs can some one give me information about this missile
Thats what older articles say. Italian ASPIDE may not be used because PAF has another weapon (H-2 missile) but no official statement has been made on it.

Else, Matra or MICA options are there but missile co-operation with South Africa seems more credible.
 
Last edited:

kashifshahzad

Banned Member
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

Oqaab said:
Thats what older articles say. Italian ASPIDE may not be used because PAF has another weapon (H-2 missile) but no official statement has been made on it.

Else, Matra or MICA options are there but missile co-operation with South Africa seems more credible.
There is little information present about H-2 and H-4 missiles i am also confused that this is a missile or a bomb but i have an article here check this out this can also solve the confustion of SABRE to some extent.

Pakistan Air Force's New Beyond Visual Range (BVR) Missiles


Pakistan Air Force has integrated the H-4 out-of-sight target bombs in its arsenal of fighter aircraft, official sources said. The incorporation of H-4 bombs have added to the capability of the PAF to hit out-of-sight targets from a distance of up to 120 kilometres to evade enemy radars during air strikes. A lighter version of the bomb, H-2 model, can hit the out-of-sight targets from a range of up to 60 kilometres.

"It is a step towards adding the Beyond Visual Range (BVR) missiles to our arsenal for defensive purposes and to address the strategic imbalance in the region," sources said.

The indigenously produced H-4 bombs is an achievement of the National Engineering and Scientific Commission (NESCOM), which works in close collaboration with Pakistan Missile Organizationand the Air Weapons Complex.

"Three successful tests of H-4, with the latest conducted this year, produced satisfactory results leading to addition of arsenal in the fighter jets," the sources said.

The H-4 bombs have been made through indigenous efforts by modifying the technological design of South African T-Darter BVR missiles. Till the induction of JF-17 Thunder in 2006, with a provision for BVRs, the H-2 and H-4 bombs could be carried by Mirage fighter jets. The H-4 infrared device is said to be comparable to that of the AA11, AA12 and Python 4 in the Indian arsenal.

Moreover, the sources said, fighter aircraft in PAF's arsenal have the "provision" to be fitted with precision-guided munitions and BVR missiles. When asked about advantages of BVR in Indian arsenal, PAF spokesperson Air Commodore Sarfaraz said: "We are aggressively trying to utilize whatever equipment we have to its optimum operational limits through professional training and by pursuing high standards of maintenance."

Mr Sarfaraz said: "We are aware of our technological needs and are vigorously trying to meet those requirements either through procurements or indigenous developments."

The European and the US suppliers were currently not willing to share the technology with Pakistan. However, contacts were being established with China, defence sources said, adding that JF-17 Thunder (to be inducted in 2006), F-16s and the Mirage aircraft in Pakistan's fleet all had the provision to be fitted with BVRs once the technology and the missiles would be acquired.


So the range of the missile shows that thunder must have latest radar more then 150km range but now it only has limited options i.e.

KLJ-10: There is not much known about this Chinese Radar, it is a probably a variant of radar used on J-10. It has met PAF's requirements and therefore has been chosen for initial batch. One can get some idea of its capability by looking at other Radars, whose Manufacturers were/are competing for JF-17/FC-1 Radar Contract.

RC-400: This Radar is believed to have a range of around 100 KM and can track as many as 32 targets.

Griffo S7: Range is about 100KM, Simultaneous engagement of atleast 2 targets.

Kopyo-F: This Phased-Array Radar has range of about 75 KM. It can track 20 targets and engage 4 simulataneously.


Elta EL/M 2032: Air-to-Air detection and tracking range up to 80 NM.


After initial batches of thunders there must be a superior radar in place and that RD-93 is tooooo smoky this can help enemies in a dogfight so this issue must be adressed.
 

Oqaab

New Member
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

kashifshahzad said:
So the range of the missile shows that thunder must have latest radar more then 150km range but now it only has limited options i.e.
We dont need 150 km range Radars. Any radar with search range of more then 100 km will be good for JF-17. Neither Indian nor Pakistani aircrafts will launch their BVR missiles from a distance of more then 40 kms.

KLJ-10: There is not much known about this Chinese Radar, it is a probably a variant of radar used on J-10. It has met PAF's requirements and therefore has been chosen for initial batch. One can get some idea of its capability by looking at other Radars, whose Manufacturers were/are competing for JF-17/FC-1 Radar Contract.
J-10 may use Israeli Elta 2035 radar. And the radar offered to FC-1 was Elta 2032. Due to some political issues between Pakistan and Israel, this option is not available. Infact, its not an option.

RC-400: This Radar is believed to have a range of around 100 KM and can track as many as 32 targets.
RC-400 has a search range of 122 km. Already rejected by PAF.

Griffo S7: Range is about 100KM, Simultaneous engagement of atleast 2 targets.
Two versions of grifo radar were offered to Pakistan. One with 600 mm diameter antenna and the other with 800 mm diameter antenna. Pakistan makes the first one (600 mm diameter) under licence. It has a range of 80 km and can easily be fitted in JF-17s nose. However, the other version (800 mm diameter) needs larger nose. Its range is slightly more then 100 kms.
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

kashifshahzad said:
And also ApsideA2A missile i have seen this name in the weapons which thunder will use i cant find any specs can some one give me information about this missile
There is a European arms embargo on China - they aren't going to get access to Aspide
 

kashifshahzad

Banned Member
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

gf0012-aust said:
There is a European arms embargo on China - they aren't going to get access to Aspide
Can PAF use this missile if you have any specifications of this missile then i will be glad to know i have also heard that this missile will also be used by the EF.
 

kashifshahzad

Banned Member
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

Oqaab said:
We dont need 150 km range Radars. Any radar with search range of more then 100 km will be good for JF-17. Neither Indian nor Pakistani aircrafts will launch their BVR missiles from a distance of more then 40 kms.
Oqaab tell me where and in which book it is written that PAF should remain defencive suppose if PAF have radar more then 150km then they can be mini AWACS if indian Bisons have that much superior radar then why cant our new built thunders.
And how you said that both countries are not going to fire a BVR missile from a distance of more then 40km.If i was a pilot and flying a thunder then surely if i would have seen a Su30MKI that beast in my radar then i would have surely fired a missile its better to launch a missile and then return to the safe area.Think man that it is a mini AWACS having a lot of missiles bobms and it can kick our all kind of planes.I suppose that the hard points on the thunder cant be increased but at least it must have a radar having range more then 150km
 

pshamim

New Member
Verified Defense Pro
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

kashifshahzad said:
Oqaab tell me where and in which book it is written that PAF should remain defencive suppose if PAF have radar more then 150km then they can be mini AWACS if indian Bisons have that much superior radar then why cant our new built thunders.
And how you said that both countries are not going to fire a BVR missile from a distance of more then 40km.If i was a pilot and flying a thunder then surely if i would have seen a Su30MKI that beast in my radar then i would have surely fired a missile its better to launch a missile and then return to the safe area.Think man that it is a mini AWACS having a lot of missiles bobms and it can kick our all kind of planes.I suppose that the hard points on the thunder cant be increased but at least it must have a radar having range more then 150km
Kashif, I will like to answer your post in detail but unfortunately I have to catch a flight early in the morning. Firing a BVR is not as easy as you think. It requires different tactics. And in order to optimize your missile you have to stay and use your radar to support the missile. I hear a lot about fire and forget but it is really not so. You also have to consider that you may very well be a target too. If you can fire from a distance, the hostile bogey can do the same. Most of the time you may have to fire two missile to kill.

This subject is not simple. I will try to write something up which will help in understanding what a BVR combat is like.

See you in 3 weeks.
 

aaaditya

New Member
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

Oqaab said:
We dont need 150 km range Radars. Any radar with search range of more then 100 km will be good for JF-17. Neither Indian nor Pakistani aircrafts will launch their BVR missiles from a distance of more then 40 kms.



J-10 may use Israeli Elta 2035 radar. And the radar offered to FC-1 was Elta 2032. Due to some political issues between Pakistan and Israel, this option is not available. Infact, its not an option.



RC-400 has a search range of 122 km. Already rejected by PAF.



Two versions of grifo radar were offered to Pakistan. One with 600 mm diameter antenna and the other with 800 mm diameter antenna. Pakistan makes the first one (600 mm diameter) under licence. It has a range of 80 km and can easily be fitted in JF-17s nose. However, the other version (800 mm diameter) needs larger nose. Its range is slightly more then 100 kms.
why was rc400 rejected? it seems to be a pretty good radar,the kopyof and the the el/m2035 are both available with india hence it would not be wise to acquire them.
 

SABRE

Super Moderator
Verified Defense Pro
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

Oqaab said:
Thats what older articles say. Italian ASPIDE may not be used because PAF has another weapon (H-2 missile) but no official statement has been made on it.

Else, Matra or MICA options are there but missile co-operation with South Africa seems more credible.
H-2 is not an Air to Air Missile. I asked a very resourceful person & he laughed when he herd that majority of boys r calling H-2 A2A missile.

He sent me link in email couple of days later. The link is from official site of Pakistan's "Air Weapons Complex (AWC)". According to the artical H-2 or HAFR-2 is an anti-Run way weapon.

Note: According to my source it does not even qualify for Missile. It is refered to as "BOMB"

PIC:


Description
[font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]>Target penetration bomb used to neutralize concrete targets like runways, bunkers etc. [/font]

[font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]>The effect of destruction is obtained by high speed penetration and then upheaval of hard targets by exploding the warhead with minimum risk to the delivering aircraft. [/font]

[font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]>The bomb can be released at high speeds and low altitude to avoid enemy defenses. [/font]

[font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]>Upon delivery, the bomb decelerates to a very low speed to obtain the penetration angle and to increase the safety distance between the bomb and the releasing aircraft. Subsequently the firing of the rocket motor accelerates the bomb to a very high speed for penetration into the hard target.[/font]

Further Information on this official link: http://www.awc.com.pk/hafr.htm

PIC:




Compared to H-2 which is Air-to Surface Bomb, ASPIDE is Air-to-Air & Surface-to-Air Missile.
APSIDE is said to be licensed version of US AIM-7E Sparrow.
Link: http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/aspide.htm

On the other hand Chinese PL-11 Missile is considered to be a derivative of ASPIDE.
Link: http://www.sinodefence.com/missile/airlaunched/pl11.asp

Hence Oqaab we are talking about two different things. Pakistan may purchase ASPIDE with ToT while China might use its PL-11 instead.
 

Elite-Pilot

Banned Member
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

since H-2 is a bomb and it is said that it is a VERY SLOW bomb so there are chances of it to burst in mid air due to Phalanx or something!

and then to counter the phalanx (or whatever) our pilot has to go at low alititude, to deliver the bomb and then our plane and pilot is in danger.not only that but then even if they do make it back up,depending on the base defence, the plane is likely to be damaged.

but anyways lets stay on topic!

not only the radar, but the engine is also turning out to be a problem :mad:
 

Oqaab

New Member
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

kashifshahzad said:
Oqaab tell me where and in which book it is written that PAF should remain defencive suppose if PAF have radar more then 150km then they can be mini AWACS if indian Bisons have that much superior radar then why cant our new built thunders.
Unless we have enough infrastructure in our industries we cant have offensive systems. And BTW who is willing to sell us offensive systems ?

Bisons wont be a threat to us after JF-17s. Avionics systems will be having multiple target engagment and off-boresight capability.

If JF-17s have datalink capability that would help a lot. But electronic systems wont be that much complicated to guide other aircrafts and missiles i.e it cannot play the role of mini AWACS.

And how you said that both countries are not going to fire a BVR missile from a distance of more then 40km.If i was a pilot and flying a thunder then surely if i would have seen a Su30MKI that beast in my radar then i would have surely fired a missile its better to launch a missile and then return to the safe area.Think man that it is a mini AWACS having a lot of missiles bobms and it can kick our all kind of planes.I suppose that the hard points on the thunder cant be increased but at least it must have a radar having range more then 150km
Lol ... dude, may be this is the reason U are not a fighter pilot.

No offence but ... in real war scenario, even if ur aircraft is armed with Phionix missile U still have to come closer to the enemy's aircraft atlease 40 to 35 km. Otherwise the aircraft have enough tactics to perform.

Secondly, no missile is 100% accurate. Even the Israelis are doubtful about the accuracy of their Python 4 missile.

aaaditya,
why was rc400 rejected? it seems to be a pretty good radar,the kopyof and the the el/m2035 are both available with india hence it would not be wise to acquire them.
Dont know. Although talks were going on but ended unsuccessfully. And at the end of the day, we are hearing that initial batches will be having CHINESE RADAR (??) .

SABRE,
H-2 is not an Air to Air Missile. I asked a very resourceful person & he laughed when he herd that majority of boys r calling H-2 A2A missile.

He sent me link in email couple of days later. The link is from official site of Pakistan's "Air Weapons Complex (AWC)". According to the artical H-2 or HAFR-2 is an anti-Run way weapon.

Note: According to my source it does not even qualify for Missile. It is refered to as "BOMB"
Just as U are saying, there was another guy who claimed that PAF has another BVR weapon besides SD-10 and PAF is not relying on SD-10.

DAWN published this H-2/H-4 news first, and it was strange that they were calling it BVR and then a BOMB.

There is confusion about whether it is a bomb or a BVR weapon.

BTW if ur sources have some connection with Armed forces then they may misguide U.
 

SABRE

Super Moderator
Verified Defense Pro
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

Oqaab said:
SABRE,


Just as U are saying, there was another guy who claimed that PAF has another BVR weapon besides SD-10 and PAF is not relying on SD-10.

DAWN published this H-2/H-4 news first, and it was strange that they were calling it BVR and then a BOMB.

There is confusion about whether it is a bomb or a BVR weapon.

BTW if ur sources have some connection with Armed forces then they may misguide U.
Oqaab we have nothing to talk on this budy. Look at the link I gave. Its from the official site of "Air Weapons Complex (AWC)" owned by NESCOM Pakistan's main missile builders.

What ever is in the artical contained in that link is official & nothing gets more official than that.

What AWC is not answering to my email is infomation about HAFR-4 or H-4 which may be BVRAAM derived from South Africa's T-Darter.

H-4 or T-Darter, Pakistan most certainly will have to buy SD-10 along with MICA I presume.
 

rabirizvi

Member
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

i dont think HARF-1 and H-2 are same as HARF is released at low altitudes 200 meters while H-2 is a BVR bomb.as far as i know it is not possible for a bomb to achieve that kind of stunt without being powered by rocket motors
 

Elite-Pilot

Banned Member
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

SEPTEMBER/27/05

China’s Chengdu Aircraft (CAC) has postponed delivery of the first FC-1/Super-7 Thunder Dragon light fighter until 2007 to accommodate design changes. CAC says it will roll out a modified FC-1 prototype by year-end featuring revised air intakes, an extended strake and a larger vertical fin. The changes will be incorporated into the fourth prototype aircraft, a model of which was at last week’s Aviation Expo 2005 show in Beijing.

FC-1 Photo Link

Problems with the original FC-1 design began to surface after its first flight in 2003, prompting the Chengdu Aircraft Design Institute to start working on a revised version last year. The changes have forced CAC to delay production of the first batch of aircraft for launch customer Pakistan and to postpone delivery of the type from late 2005 until 2007.

CAC is believed to have decided to pursue a revised design for the FC-1’s air intakes after smoke was discovered coming from the aircraft’s Klimov RD-93 engine during test flights.

It is believed test- pilot reports of control problems prompted CAC to also expand the wing leading-edge strakes, while the manufacturer says the vertical fin was elongated to accommodate an expanded equipment bay.

The redesigned FC-1 will have a maximum take-off weight slightly above the 12,400kg (27,300lb) of the original aircraft, but its top speed will be unchanged at Mach 1.6. The first prototype of the new design is scheduled to begin test flights early next year, with another two prototypes to be completed in 2006.

CAC continues to fly two prototypes of the original design, and to use a third for static testing. The company says the new batch of prototypes will initially fly with Chinese avionics, but will later be modified with Western systems. Pakistan is now evaluating British, French and Italian avionics packages and is expected to make a selection next year.

Islamabad has already ordered 16 FC-1s, assembly of which will be split between CAC and the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex, and may acquire up to 134 more locally assembled aircraft


any comments?and which country from british,french and italian has the best radar that we can actually get in large numbers?
 

aaaditya

New Member
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

Elite-Pilot said:
SEPTEMBER/27/05

China’s Chengdu Aircraft (CAC) has postponed delivery of the first FC-1/Super-7 Thunder Dragon light fighter until 2007 to accommodate design changes. CAC says it will roll out a modified FC-1 prototype by year-end featuring revised air intakes, an extended strake and a larger vertical fin. The changes will be incorporated into the fourth prototype aircraft, a model of which was at last week’s Aviation Expo 2005 show in Beijing.

FC-1 Photo Link

Problems with the original FC-1 design began to surface after its first flight in 2003, prompting the Chengdu Aircraft Design Institute to start working on a revised version last year. The changes have forced CAC to delay production of the first batch of aircraft for launch customer Pakistan and to postpone delivery of the type from late 2005 until 2007.

CAC is believed to have decided to pursue a revised design for the FC-1’s air intakes after smoke was discovered coming from the aircraft’s Klimov RD-93 engine during test flights.

It is believed test- pilot reports of control problems prompted CAC to also expand the wing leading-edge strakes, while the manufacturer says the vertical fin was elongated to accommodate an expanded equipment bay.

The redesigned FC-1 will have a maximum take-off weight slightly above the 12,400kg (27,300lb) of the original aircraft, but its top speed will be unchanged at Mach 1.6. The first prototype of the new design is scheduled to begin test flights early next year, with another two prototypes to be completed in 2006.

CAC continues to fly two prototypes of the original design, and to use a third for static testing. The company says the new batch of prototypes will initially fly with Chinese avionics, but will later be modified with Western systems. Pakistan is now evaluating British, French and Italian avionics packages and is expected to make a selection next year.

Islamabad has already ordered 16 FC-1s, assembly of which will be split between CAC and the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex, and may acquire up to 134 more locally assembled aircraft


any comments?and which country from british,french and italian has the best radar that we can actually get in large numbers?
it would be better to acquire the french or the italian avionics and radar system as pakistan already has operational experience with them.i would prefer the french rdy radar over the fiar grifo radar(but i believe the rdy would be a bit more expensieve).:D
 

SABRE

Super Moderator
Verified Defense Pro
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

Elite-Pilot said:
this might answer your question!it took me alot of time but i pulled it off! :p:

http://www.awc.com.pk/hafr.htm
thats the link I have already given man...Its the official link from its makers.

The questions "What is HAFR-2 or H-2?" is answered in this officials link, but the questions "What is HAFR-4 or H-4?" Is not on the website.

It is just my believe that HAFR-4 is a BVR Air To Ground Missile with 120Km. Remember Indians verified this too. They said Pak has it & they are making it.

The only BVRAAM NESCOM might have produced at this moment would be the verient of South Africa's T-Darter.

From what I have come to know is that PAF has tested two BVR Missiles so far in high-mark 2005 & still have two more to go. This means there are four. Two are A2G & other two must be A2A.

i dont think HARF-1 and H-2 are same as HARF is released at low altitudes 200 meters while H-2 is a BVR bomb.as far as i know it is not possible for a bomb to achieve that kind of stunt without being powered by rocket motors
There is no HAFR-1. Only HAF-2 & HAFR-4 & yes they are not the same. HAFR-2 from the official link proves that its an anti-Run way BOMB. Also see the demonstration pic. I dont even know wheather HAFR-2 is a BVR or not.
see the demonstration picture.

HAFR-2 may be the only BVR A2G missile.
 
Last edited:

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

This is not a thread about the Pakistani Air Force and it's weapons procurement decisions.

Please get back to the topic folks.
 

SABRE

Super Moderator
Verified Defense Pro
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

Elite-Pilot said:
CAC is believed to have decided to pursue a revised design for the FC-1’s air intakes after smoke was discovered coming from the aircraft’s Klimov RD-93 engine during test flights.
This smoke was pointed out by few members here about a year ago. I think we were discussing pictures of JF-17 PT-2/3. Changes seemed predictable since than & have come pretty quickly.
 
Last edited:

SATAN

New Member
Re: BeiJing news from show: New strong JF-17 alike JSF with "DSI"

Put some Cannards on this jet and it starts looking more like a JAS Gripen.
 
Top