Pirates

Status
Not open for further replies.

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
October 16, 2009 - Somali pirates yesterday seized a Singapore-flagged container ship in the Indian Ocean near the Seychelles, maritime sources told AFP...

The maritime security centre of the European Union, which has an anti-piracy naval force patrolling waters affected by Somali piracy, also confirmed the hijacking. 'During the early morning of Oct 15, 2009, a Singapore-flagged container ship Kota Wajar was hijacked in the Indian Ocean by pirates some 300 nautical miles north of the Seychelles,' a statement said. 'An EU Navfor maritime patrol aircraft was tasked to investigate the situation.'

The latest hijacking brings to at least six the number of vessels in the hands of Somali pirates... AFP.
A Pacific International Lines (PIL) spokesman said the crew were safe but declined to give any further details, including whether the company had made contact with the pirates. In a statement issued to local press on Thursday, PIL said it was “taking all possible steps to ensure the safety of the ship, crew and cargo onboard”.

Few details of the hijacking of the Singapore-flagged vessel and its 21 crew have emerged, save that there are two Singapore Permanent Residents (SPRs) on board. The 1997-built, 1,550 TEU 184-metre long container ship, was boarded by pirates 550 miles off the coast of Somalia while enroute to Mombasa, Kenya.

The Singapore Shipping Association (SSA), of which PIL managing director SS Teo is president, strongly condemned the hijacking. “The SSA is very concerned with the safety and personal well being of all the officers and crew on board and the anxieties caused to the members of their families,” the SSA said.

My thoughts are with the families of the crew onboard and Mr SS Teo, whom I'm sure will leave no stone unturned to get his crew home safe.
 
Last edited:

luca28

New Member
Somalia Piracy Strategy to be on Trial

defence.professionals | defpro.com

International community begins to shift focus to the roots of the problem

08:01 GMT, November 19, 2009 defpro.com | Promptly following the subsiding of the phenomenon called monsoon, piracy in the Gulf of Aden started up and a small number of successful attacks proves that the freedom of action of the pirates has still not been sufficiently reduced by the congregated military might of the world’s greatest powers. Just to mention the most recent attacks: On Monday, pirates hijacked a Virgin Islands-owned chemical tanker and took 28 crew members captive. The captain of the ship was wounded during the attack and died Tuesday night from internal bleeding. On Tuesday, the US-flagged Maersk Alabama repelled an attack (however, only with the consequent use of defensive technology and gun fire; see defence.professionals | defpro.com). The Maersk Alabama had previously been hijacked last April.

While the task force of different navies, such as the US, NATO, EU, Russia and China, have tried to protect the waters of the Horn of Africa, the recent successes have once again shown that the pirates are well organised, using larger mother-ships to roam the extensive sea territories, and smaller and faster skiffs for swift attacks on commercial vessels. However, it also demonstrates their flexibility and skill in safely navigating in a sea area far too extensive to be controlled by any naval force. Over 168 incidents of piracy were reported off Somalia in the first nine months of 2009 compared to 111 during all of 2008. Although most of these attacks were repelled, 533 hostages have, nonetheless, been taken so far in 2009, of which 150 are still held by pirates, and the amount of the ransoms they demand continues to rise. Further, the deterrent effect of the international naval presence has not yet resulted in improved safety within the world's piracy hotspot.


More surveillance needed

In order to increase the effectiveness of the naval forces, more helicopters and reconnaissance aircraft for aerial surveillance are urgently needed. The Gulf of Aden and the Somali Basin, where the majority of attacks occur, make up over two million square kilometres. It is, indeed, not possible to guarantee any level of security without a network of different aerial surveillance systems. As a matter of fact, reconnaissance aircraft or drones would help to control the sheer size of the area of operations. Rear Admiral Peter Hudson, Operation Commander of the Naval Force Atalanta, the EU’s naval mission against pirates in the area, indicated that satellites are already in use, in particular for tracking pirate vessels.

Also urgently needed is that the nations stays committed to this mission. As a positive signal to its allies, the new German government yesterday extended its participation in a mission to fight piracy off the coast of Lebanon by six months. The country’s contribution to the anti-piracy mission at the Horn of Africa was also prolonged. In the upcoming days, the European Council is expected to extend operation EUNAVFOR, its first-ever naval operation for another year, until December 2010.


Piracy problem can’t be solved on sea

Unfortunately, many parties involved in the current fight against piracy resort to “putting lipstick on the pig”. Most speak of a success of the operations and of the vast number of ships that have been escorted since the beginning of the missions and the cases in which pirate attacks were averted by warships. However, at a meeting of EU Defence Ministers in Brussels, which concentrated on EU’s anti-piracy naval operation Atalanta and a broader involvement in Somalia, the first steps in the right direction were made. As the Estonian Ministry of Defence explained “the meeting discussed EU’s activity to train the Somali security forces and approved EU’s crisis management concept for a possible new training mission which will allow, if needed, for the planning of the training of the security forces of the Somali transitional government” (see also: defence.professionals | defpro.com).

It is the first time that the international community openly and comprehensively addresses the root of the piracy problem and shows that it has understood that the issue will never be resolved at sea alone. During the NATO Parliamentary Assembly on Sunday, Rapporteur Lord Jopling (UK), therefore, argued for a “comprehensive approach, combining diplomacy, naval deployments and development assistance” in the region.

He said that this comprehensive approach should promote a “long-term regional solution” by “assisting states of the region to build the capacity to tackle piracy and other regional security challenges on their own”.

During a briefing, Vice Admiral Hans-Jochen Witthauer, Deputy Commander of NATO’s Allied Maritime Component Command in Northwood, UK, said that an improved Somali coastguard would contribute to maritime security in the region, although he praised the Somali efforts overall. This regional capacity could “eventually replace NATO at sea” in the area, he said.

The new strategy must now find international support. One source is the United Nations International Maritime Organization, which recently pledged to help Somalia create a national coast guard. However, it is questionable if these selective measures can show any true result in the overall hornet’s nest that Somalia is, considering the political problems of the current administration and the economic situation of the country that drives many former fishers into piracy and attracts organised crime from around the world.
defence.professionals | defpro.com
 

Crunchy

New Member
The return of a UN-backed & with a robust mandate & sufficient manpowered force to Somalia is the only longterm solution. But AfPak and Iraq has tied down too many potential countries.
:(

But maybe the never-ending deployment of naval task forces, is cheaper than rebuilding Somalia? :confused:

Furthermore international community should keep an eye on Yemen. We can not let another country collaps once more.

2cents
 

John Sansom

New Member
Just a wee observation, Crunchy. Whatever may be happening cost-wise and in terms of Somalia's commitment to chaos, this wretched pirate business is turning into an ideal training situation for the men and women of quite a few navies.

That aside, for our part, we non-pirates appear to be more and more willing to fall into the ransom trap. Now, the only way to get out of it appears to be through a most decidedly robust joint forces effort which will ensure that the pirate "strongholds" are completely destroyed.

There's another two cents....and, hey, it looks like we're developing a budget.
 

Pre-Dreadnought

New Member
Some things don't go away...

It's right that piracy on the high seas is being given serious attention by Governments as well as private individuals and shipping companies. However, piracy should have been consigned to the 18th century. Isn't it interesting that the things we thought had been dealt with, and that includes slavery as well as piracy, haven't gone away at all. What other evils have yet to be resurrected?
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
It might have something to do with that fact that the region in question is not what you consider part of the developed world.....
 

blondfeet

New Member
Roe

The big question with dealing with pirates is rules of engagement, most of the time all that happens if these pirates are not caught in the act, is there weapons are thrown over board and they are released to fight another day, because no country want to put them on trial. The pirates know when these big ships are passing through because you can track them all on the internet, they can simply pick chose when and where they want to attack.
 

John Sansom

New Member
Aye....and there's the conundrum. How does one "fix" under-development in a region to prevent things like piracy, the long-standing activities of "guerilla states", and the domination of local populaces by those who have the most weapons (and use them freely).

Positive and helpful social engineering is possible, of course, but the sad reality is that it just isn't going to get anywhere without the obvious presence of the "big stick". Somalia is a case in point. Right now the available "positives" seem limited to the often incredibly heroic efforts of NGO members and the often contradictory pronouncements of local and not-so-local politicians.

Material relief shipments keep pouring in, of course, but who are the real beneficiaries? And what is the current security status of these seaborne shipments?

The conundrum goes on.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Two options: either we leave the place alone and let the strongest warlords run the show, or someone brings in force, takes the place of the strongest warlord, and runs the show. engaging in some major long-term state building.
 

Drewid

Banned Member
Just asking - what if....

What if for example china or russia decide to earn some respect by solving this problem by using ruthless force? Do you think that burning down whole pirate bases (even with some innocents - collaterall damage must be accepted) with heavy weaponry - thermobaric bombs, small nukes, or just simple artillery fire from ships would have any negative international consequence for them? Or just ordinary UN pacifistic propaganda crap?
I don´t understand why are all involved goverment so cowardly dealing with this scum?
Yes, some maybe innocent somalians will die - but really, who cares?

Rules must be obeyed - and being poor and starving is not excuse. Obey or die !
 

1805

New Member
This problem is not going to go away until the Naval Powers adopt a shoot to kill policy. Fire at the next pirate mother ship and sink it. While they face little recourse they will continue. The whole Horne of Africa area is a problem getting out of control, while the West appetite for intervention drains away in Afghanistan an new haven of terrisom grows financed by piracy
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Just asking - what if....

What if for example china or russia decide to earn some respect by solving this problem by using ruthless force? Do you think that burning down whole pirate bases (even with some innocents - collaterall damage must be accepted) with heavy weaponry - thermobaric bombs, small nukes, or just simple artillery fire from ships would have any negative international consequence for them? Or just ordinary UN pacifistic propaganda crap?
I don´t understand why are all involved goverment so cowardly dealing with this scum?
Yes, some maybe innocent somalians will die - but really, who cares?

Rules must be obeyed - and being poor and starving is not excuse. Obey or die !
Sounds a bit fascistic. And if you have rules that create structural poverty then you have a problem. You're creating the criminals. But enough on politics. Nukes are out of the question. The real problem here isn't hunting down established pirate bases. It's the fact that the area will produce pirates systematically. If you want to deal with it you have to basically invade Somalia proper. Could Russia or China solve the problem? Yes. But why would they? It's expensive and difficult. Would meet with some international crying about disproportional use of force. And they would have little to gain. Both Russia and China are much better served politicall by participating in the existing format. That way they are doing something to help. They win brownie points with established players. Get some experience of long range deployments (VMF especially) and at the same time don't have to commit too much in terms of resources.
 

John Sansom

New Member
Well, Feanor, you sure have the options right. The time to choose between them is NOW. My druthers rest with the second option; hardly an easy choice in terms of committing others to do the "dirty" work. Still, many years ago, I was one of those "others" and stood ready to accept imposed options in a world which was no less perilous and alarming than it is now.

At that time, I recall my mother complaining bitterly (because she stood to lose two sons) that the whole business was one of "old men sending young men out to die." Fact is, though, the majority of those "old men" had themselves spent some time in elephant country and were under no illusions about the decisions they were making.

The sad reality is that the world is truly full of very real dragons....and they have to be faced.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Well actually it seems like all parties involved are satisfied with the status quo. The Western powers have relative safety of the sea lanes, without committing too much to it. Russia, China, and India are getting some experience in international operations, and getting some international recognition from established players, as contributors. And the pirates can still go on hunting after ships, if not as freely as before.
 

stoker

Member
This problem is not going to go away until the Naval Powers adopt a shoot to kill policy. Fire at the next pirate mother ship and sink it. While they face little recourse they will continue. The whole Horne of Africa area is a problem getting out of control, while the West appetite for intervention drains away in Afghanistan an new haven of terrisom grows financed by piracy
Agree to a point.

Back in the WW1 they had 'Q' ships to deal with the surfaced submarine attacks.

Instead of blowing away the next pirate mother ship ( they will start to carry unarmed women ad children on them), all you need is a well armed 8 man squads with sniper type weapons, you don't need massive fire power to take out pirates just well aimed deliberate single shots.

You put these self contained sqads on individual ships as they come in to the pirate zone and take them off as the ship leaves the pirate zone, they would not need to be on every ship, just ad hoc.
They would need clearly defined 'right to fire' rules, squad leader would need the authority to issue this 'lethal force' and be accountable for it, and suitable C.C.T.V./ Video camera equipment to record evidence.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
But that's expensive and difficult. Currently there are special forces teams on most anti-piracy ships. But this kind of set up for many civilian ships would be complicated.

Not to mention that the attacks are just not damaging enough to shipping to make it worthwhile for a major investment.
 

Uche Africanus

New Member
This is a very interesting thread. And thanks to the posters for the solutions they proferred for finding a solution to the problem of piracy off the Somalian coast. I do have an observation to make and I hope that I'm not merely echoing what has already been said.

It appears to me that the international community is not fully committed to solving this piracy problem. Otherwise, they could fund the participation of countries like Nigeria and South Africa in the African Union force that is already in Somalia. The support of these countries will increase the number of the AU force in Somalia and also enhance its capacity for disrupting the ground assets that the pirates have on the ground in Somalia and also impede their capacity to launch their pirate vessels at will. Secondly, the over fishing done in the coast of Somalia by fishing trawlers from East Asia and Russia has to stop or at least, curtailed. These countries cannot by their illegal fishing activities put the Somalian fishing boats out of work and expect the Somalians to sit idly by sulking their thumbs whilst their children starve to death.
 

The Swordman

New Member
Stabilize Somalia

In my opinion is quite difficult to stabilize Somalia using only military options. Remember "Restore Hope" back in the nineties? It was a giant fault, a compilation of major mistakes that cost an ugly number of lives.

Somalia is a failed state. Somaliland and Puntland are looking for international status as new nations, the main part of the country is split between a number of warlords. Piracy is just a consequence of a bigger drama.
 

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
According to CNN, the crew from U.S. Navy destroyer, the USS Farragut of CTF-151 just apprehended eight suspected pirates after they foiled an attack on the Tanzanian-flagged MV Barakaale 1 that was transiting through the Gulf of Aden. The full news release from the Combined Maritime Forces Public Affairs Office is here and it contains more details, including how one suspected pirate fell overboard whilst attempting to board the MV Barakaale 1.

Blogger EagleSpeak also posted on the latest action with CTF-151 here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top