please stay on topic like what our friend said, this is a Phil. Airforce thread and discussions about planes, thank youA huge bulk of tuna canning factories in the Philippines is based in GenSan (our local abbreviation). So it would have been a wise business investment for the US regardless. As so far as I know, the only US forces stationed in the Philippines are in Zamboanga. The United States developed GenSan not just for military purposes, but developed it in a way so that they could have a base IF a conflict arose. I've been on flights from GenSan to Manila and the airport as a whole is not that great, but the runways are wider in the Philippine context (especially for a relatively insignificant domestic airport), very reminiscent of a military airbase.
But I'm sure the highway I've been on many times were made by American contractors and a huge bulk paid with American taxpayer money (USAID). And as for the rumors, don't take it too seriously.
Everytime i read things like this, i always thinks "How is it possible? Filipina is not a poor country, around 300.000 sq km in size, with a population of around 30% of Indonesia." Why they spend such a pathetic small amount of their budget to defence?"A recent report by the Commission on Audit at the end of 2010 states that only about 25% of the PAF aircraft can fly (Mostly Helicopters) and the rest are in junkyard conditions with almost 0% capability in defending the nation...
COA: Only a fourth of PAF aircraft can fly; most fit for junkyard | Inquirer News
I agree with you, the entire defense budget alloted for this nation of almost 100 million citizens is only around $2.5 Billion for FY-2011 which is less than 1% of it's over $350 Billion annual GDP... Making it at least $5 Billion per year at about 1.8% of the current GDP will create a credible armed forces capable of responding to national security threats...Everytime i read things like this, i always thinks "How is it possible? Filipina is not a poor country, around 300.000 sq km in size, with a population of around 30% of Indonesia." Why they spend such a pathetic small amount of their budget to defence?"
Defense sometimes for developing nation like Philippines, or Indonesia that currently did not faced immediate external threat, become a very sensitive issue. Especially for Politician. Also for developing nation, the amount of Government budget usually much smaller in the proportion toward overall GDP.I agree with you, the entire defense budget alloted for this nation of almost 100 million citizens is only around $2.5 Billion for FY-2011 which is less than 1% of it's over $350 Billion annual GDP... Making it at least $5 Billion per year at about 1.8% of the current GDP will create a credible armed forces capable of responding to national security threats...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)
I guess you thought 'WRONG' as the US is primarily interested for their own interest and gains only and as the saying goes, there is no such thing as 'FREE LUNCH' in this world...The $2.5 Billion annual DND budget is not a wasted money and should actually be doubled in order to have a credible defense capability in which every sovereign nation is RESPONSIBLE for providing to everyone of it's citizens......I thought the U.S. was willing to protect the Philippines from any foreign threat o_o.
I just think that extra $2.5 billion spent in the military is wasted money that could be used on better things. No small country is going to attack the Philippines if it's under U.S. protection, while if a big country is going to do it, I highly doubt that extra $2.5 billion is going to do much.
as a nation it's the duty if it's own people to defend it's sovereignty, you can depend to other countries forces to patrol or guard your territory, U.S. can help because of the mutual defence treaty, but they must also provide was it needed as written in Phil. Constitution.I thought the U.S. was willing to protect the Philippines from any foreign threat o_o.
I just think that extra $2.5 billion spent in the military is wasted money that could be used on better things. No small country is going to attack the Philippines if it's under U.S. protection, while if a big country is going to do it, I highly doubt that extra $2.5 billion is going to do much.
as a nation it's the duty if it's own people to defend it's sovereignty, you can depend to other countries forces to patrol or guard your territory, U.S. can help because of the mutual defence treaty, but they must also provide was it needed as written in Phil. Constitution.
Yes, your exactly right... it's the lack of political will, but not the funds to properly maintain what assets they currently have remaining since it is alloted annually on their budget...I have no doubt that as more funds become available, attention wiil be turned to the PAF to get new assets. The problem at the moment however is that there seems to be a lack of political will or funds to simply maintain what is currently operated.
Philippine Air Force in Bad Shape: Spokesman - Defense News
The PAF should really invest in a small fleet of gunships, Pack it with rapid fire cannon/MGs and targeting systems capable of all-weather operation, it would have the firpower and endurance that light aircraft and choppers lack. Even Puff the Magic Dragon of VietNam vintage would be a big improvement but there should be no problem upgrading to modern tech, funds permitting. IMO it should be a priority.PAF to conduct 3rd straight days of bombing sorties over specific targets on Mindanao island today, OV-10's were utilized during the 1st day of operations and yesterday it was the MD-520's with the UH-1 Hueys providng air support for the ground units while the S-211's might be use in todays sorties...All of these activities are in response to the recent killings of more than 20 SAF soldiers by the rebels last week on Basilan island...
ASIA NEWS NETWORK
First air strikes on Philippine rebels since 2008 - Â*Latest news around the world and developments close to home - MSN Philippines News
PAF should get C-130s, They can use them as gunships, MPAs and of course from strategic transport. The MPA quality they need more than any other to deal with the maritime problems.
Something like the harvest hawk would be good could also be used for paratroopers.Maybe they can come up with a modular CAS package that can be installed as the need arises? Those a/c will be limited in number and will be tasked primarily for transport but if they can morph into gunships then they would be even more useful. The USMC has Harvest Hawk w/c allows a regular C-130 to be reconfigured very quickly to gunship configuration. We don't need the same level of sophistication but the principle applies.