Every survey/opinion poll done in the western world Pre-vaccines, suggested around 60-70% of people would get vaccinated without hesitation, another 20-30% were unsure but could be convinced (carrot/stick) and the remaining 5-10% would never get it.
The vaccine coverage in countries such as Australia follows this trend, around 90-95% of people eligible (over 12 years old) have been vaccinated. The widespread use of vaccine mandates seems to have worked to encourage the 20-30% of people that were unsure, to get vaccinated.
This page is no longer being actively maintained.
www.theguardian.com
So the person you are talking about probably fits into the 5-10% who will never do it. I’ve also met a couple of people like this. They believe so strongly in saying no, they’re even quitting jobs and their children are unable to attend on campus university lectures etc. Nothing the government can do will change their mind. Nothing society says (cultural/peer pressure) will change their mind either.
So should we impose more restrictions and use heavier penalties (such as the hospital charge mentioned above) to convince them?
Last year I thought “Yes!, I’m doing the right thing, why shouldn’t they?” After all, it’s for the good of society right?
However as time has gone on and more rules have been imposed, the less I agree with my past self. The risk from heavier penalties and stricter rules is the unintended consequences.
The people who through no fault of their own, end up on the “wrong side” of the system or rules intended to protect them from COVID. At the end of the day, what we are doing is discriminating against people because of something they do or don’t have (in this case a vaccine).
As an expat Aussie, I have spent much of the last two years looking with frustration and disappointment at my country as they imposed various rules on citizens to prevent the spread of COVID. One of which was the border international border closure.
No, it was never “closed” but the restrictions made it all but impossible to return for the average person or family. The cost for tickets and lack of availability made it impossible for more than 1-2 people to travel, effectively closing the border. Plus at one point the Australian Government applied the Biosecurity Act and threatened jail time for CITIZENS returning from India during their Delta peak. As far as I know, the only country on earth to impose similar restrictions on their own citizens.
Australia makes it temporarily illegal to return from India, which is being ravaged by Covid-19.
www.bbc.com
Whether you agree or not is irrelevant, by doing this, the Australian government was making their citizens someone else’s problem as they became stuck in various parts of the world. One of the fundamental reasons for “freedom of access” provisions for citizens comes from this issue, one country shouldn’t lock out its own citizens, thereby imposing a burden on another country.
“No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of the right to enter his own country”
(From various UN and international law documents)
I agree with the general strategy of restricting arrivals and preventing the arrival of disease on to an island nation like Australia (or NZ). Let me make that clear, I agree with the general strategy. It plays to our geographical strengths.
But, it is a perfect example of what I mean about having to be careful with the various public health rules and mandates being applied around the world. In this case 10’s of thousands of people were effected. Even now, an estimated 20,000 people are stuck outside Western Australia after they delayed their border opening.
The Board of Airline Representatives said it would take airlines 75 weeks to clear the backlog of passengers who had booked tickets in anticipation of the February 5 reopening.
amp.smh.com.au
I also recently experienced these unintended consequences because I didn’t fit in the rules. Despite being vaccinated and happy to do so, because of a recent COVID infection I was unable to access a government service because I couldn’t obtain a negative PCR (you can test positive for months after symptoms go away). I had done what I was told, but was denied access through no fault of my own.
Common questions about recovered/previously positive COVID-19 patients
www.utsouthwestern.edu
To summarise, we need to be careful about discrimination against anyone. That includes the unvaccinated. Rules need to be crafted to encourage people to get vaccinated in higher risk settings. But we also need easy access to vaccination hubs to provide encouragement to keep people vaccinated as boosters become available. Carrot and stick. But vaccinated or not, we are all still people, we are all still worthy of compassion and access to health care or government services. The key is finding the balance