JF-17 Thunder / FC-1 / Super-7 Discussions

PJ-10 BrahMos said:
Has the JF-17 implemented a Quadruplex Digital Fly-By-Wire
Click to expand...

i am not sure but ACM said it had a full FBW with 6 redundant back up FBW systems, and it also has a Manual hydraulic control for extreme circumstances, this proves it that the FBW system on the JF-17 is not reliable and they might be making sure that the FBW system does not brake down in a sortie.
 
im also assuming that the armamount platform for the JF-17 is limited, i hear that they can have the following

Right now it should/would/could have these weapons

SD-10
PL-9C
Magic II
AIM-9P-4/L
AGM-65 (highly possible)
AS-30L laser guided missile
Pave way Laser Guided Bombs
Mk-80 family dumb bombs
 
According to news I read when the first prototype was tested. JF-17 has Quadruplex Digital Fly-By-Wire! Please stop comparing LCA vs JF-17 IN THIS THREAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This thread is strictly for JF-17, its development, its testing, its features and its specs!!!!!!!! :mad
 
The armament list u have posted is quite limited PJ.If u want the whole kaboodle read the thread from page1 onwards.And the Thunder can carry both the H-2(MUPSOW) and it's derived cruise missile the H-4(RAPTOR).BTW Pakistan has bought the whole technology and sales rights of the above two PGMs from Kentron.
 
Re: FC-1 / Super 7 / JF-17

JF-17 FC1 is a successer of Russian Mig-33 which was a flop air cract Russian reject it then Chinese reject it. Why Pakistan is adopting failed project?
 
Re: FC-1 / Super 7 / JF-17

ashoaib, please read the 5 part story of the Jf-17 brought to us by DefenseTalk.com and when you understand that clearly, then post anything in this thread. Your current post just shows your lack of proper information and abundance of ignorance. :smokingc:
 
corsair7772 said:
MYST!!!! give respect to the masses will you? :help
Click to expand...

Corsair buddy, its not about disrespect; its more about me getting irritated by irresponsible comments without knowing the 'facts' and 'figures' and 'ground realities'. One baseless post can lead to another hundred senseless posts with people trying to correct each other out. So its better to read 'something' about a particular issue and 'then' post to avoid senseless discussions. Thnx 'ashoaib' for understanding. :smokingc:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top