F-35 Program - General Discussion

Stampede

Well-Known Member
It should really be a tic-tok strategy a small upgrade, followed up a much larger one. The ticks and the tocks can be separate programs.

While there are some 6th gen fighter programs being thrown around, there aren't any cheap 6th gen fighter programs AFAIK. The F-35 is likely to have a long life span, and should have a series of upgrades in a pipeline. There are what? 1000 F-35's currently flying around, that is already a huge fleet.

Money should be provided for both programs, the priority can be PW for low risk and the easiest upgrade for the existing fleet. If they want to keep selling F-35 going forward, they will need to incorporate newer technologies and capabilities.

Increasing the flight endurance of the F-35 would be a great way to lower cost per flight hour and get more hours out of the fleet.

Ultimately I think while you may be right, this PW thinking is flawed. China doesn't care about GE or PW. In the Pacific the F-35 is short ranged, all western fighters are. Carriers alone is not enough to fight China. In 10 years China will be approaching or matching US carrier capabilities in the Pacific. USS Ford sitting 200km off the Chinese coast isn't a threat, its a target.

The US is locked in competition with China. China isn't the soviet union, they have an economy, they have technologies and they a spending big money. They aren't on the other side of the iron curtain either, so the US MUST keep developing its technological edge.

Coasting is no longer a strategy for the US industrial complex. They are being outproduced for the first time, basically ever. The US has a technological edge, but its eroding and the quantitively edge is disappearing very fast.

The F-35 Market is a big one, it has sold well, everyone is on the band wagon. Failing to continue to develop this aircraft would be pretty much a collapse of allied airpower.
Quote of the day

"USS Ford sitting 200km off the Chinese coast isn't a threat, its a target."

It's interesting when a military asset / capability becomes a liability.

Don't get me wrong carriers have a place.
But like all bits of kit, including the F35, it's the "when and where" that you employ it that is important to remember.

"USS Ford sitting 200km off the Chinese coast isn't a threat, its a target."............................................Brilliant!



Cheers S
 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
A history lesson on why engine competition is a good thing. It certainly worked for 4th Gen fighters. Jet engine technology is a big advantage for US aerospace and losing the lead in this critical technology would be a disaster. AETP must eventually be available for the F-35 (A and C at least).

 

StingrayOZ

Super Moderator
Staff member
It's interesting when a military asset / capability becomes a liability.

Don't get me wrong carriers have a place.
But like all bits of kit, including the F35, it's the "when and where" that you employ it that is important to remember.
Its been a while since the US has had a truly capable foe.

In the Chinese, in waters around China, the US truly do have a peer. Today. And they manufacture like hard working westerners, not broken communist soviets.

In 5 years, they will have increased their lead, nearly matching US power projecting in the whole of the Pacific/Indian oceans.

To most countries, a US carrier would be very intimidating, that is no longer the case with China.
 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
The Pentagon won’t accept new F-35s until software issues for TR-3 are worked out. LM expects this to happen sometime later this year. Once this happens, one has to wonder how many F135 engines will be trashed early due to the increased power requirements for TR-3 along with block 4 software as the F135 ECU is years away.

 

StingrayOZ

Super Moderator
Staff member
The Pentagon won’t accept new F-35s until software issues for TR-3 are worked out. LM expects this to happen sometime later this year. Once this happens, one has to wonder how many F135 engines will be trashed early due to the increased power requirements for TR-3 along with block 4 software as the F135 ECU is years away.
Highlighting how perhaps having one exclusive engine is perhaps not ideal. Two parallel developments really should be going on. One being the ECU and the other being AETP.

It will be a huge job to ECU existing in storage aircraft, and then roll it out to existing flying aircraft.
 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
Highlighting how perhaps having one exclusive engine is perhaps not ideal. Two parallel developments really should be going on. One being the ECU and the other being AETP.

It will be a huge job to ECU existing in storage aircraft, and then roll it out to existing flying aircraft.
Agree, two vendors keeps the industrial base busy and competition is good. Having two companies investing in making their engines better, what’s not to like? The teen series jets saw both GE and P&W engines (F-14, F-15 and F-16). The F-18 I believe is GE only.
 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
Some more controversy over the F135 cooling system with Honeywell claiming they are at a disadvantage due to Collins being part of the same company (RTX) that owns P&W, perhaps they should partner with GE and push for their AETP engine.

 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
This article highlights the problem of sales success wrt the F-35. Production capacity is falling behind due to strong demand. Also, there is the block 4 and ECU issues still to be sorted. Some good points about the risks to vendors expanding production. Best line, “How many parts do you need to build a plane….all of them”.

 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
This the latest idea to get TR-3 F-35 versions operating, a partial software upgrade with the full block 4 software coming later. However there is no mention of the F135 engine upgrade to address power and cooling requirements.

 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
As if Block 4 delays were not enough, a lawsuit against LM’s titanium supplier over pricing. Haven’t followed titanium prices but am inclined to believe the subcontractor version given most titanium comes from Russia which I assume can’t export to the US anymore.

 

Redlands18

Well-Known Member
Quite a good video, busting some myths that still exist about the F-35. 1000 aircraft delivered to17 nations and you still get people claiming its a lemon.
 

numairsohail

New Member
Welcome. But no one or two word replies. Make meaningful contributions. Or use emoticons. One liners often cause agonistic discussion away from facts. Forum rules. Warning applied.
super explanation.
 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
Apologies if this has been posted before but this video by Hazard Lee and Billy Flynn describes a significant advance most of us non-fighter pilot blokes would not be aware of. The video is a tad long.

 
Top