This system sounds by far the most practical solution. Now if the ADF does adopt it, I really hope it's not like 6 units....it needs to be in meaningful numbers.
Now the containers....questions.
Could the containers be fixed to existing ships if extra capacity is needed? I'm thinking the Hunter class multi-purpose bays?
Just to clarify the mk70 was the original concept. It was designed to plumb into existing ship combat management systems and power, so it minimises the additional infrastructure required for electricity, control and sensing. It relies very heavily on modern systems like virtual Aegis and parent ship sensors. So call it a light pack. If it's put on say an LCS it still needs a nearby AB to control it.
The Typhon took this stripped down system, added a control package and radar, included a portable genset and fuel supply, and put it on a semi trailer such that it could be fully mobile on land. I should note it also requires an accommodation caravan for upwards of 100 people. So it's the full requirement for independent operation anywhere.
Given how a mk70 opens up to fire, it needs unencumbered space above it. I would suggest it is something strapped to a helo deck rather than inside a multi purpose bay.
Herein is the problem with it in the maritime environment. It comes at the expense of a helo capability. My personal view is that is too much to give up.
The Typhon seems to be finding a niche market, but it is still a logistical beast to move around.
I haven't seen the cost comparison, but I wonder how Typhon compares against Aegis Ashore for a fixed base installation. The Japanese budgeted about US$4.3B for two units.
www.innovationaus.com
www.australiandefence.com.au
