Takao
The Bunker Group
@Raven22 - I was just about to write something very similar to this.I wouldn’t go looking for too much logic in the organisation of the 2nd division. There are that many vested interests and sacred cows in the reserve that any meaningful change has proven impossible. The greatest example of this is that both SUR and UNSWR still exist. The units are only about five km apart and are entirely redundant, yet the olds and bolds won’t let their unit be disbanded, hence they both still exist. Meanwhile, there is not a single reserve depot in Western Sydney, where so much of the population now lies.
This is where, in my opinion, the leadership of the reserve is letting the rank and file down. The leadership still sees the 2nd division as the 3rd AIF in waiting, and resist anything that would risk that viewpoint. There is such tremendous potential in the reserve, but because that potential only involves the reserve supplementing the regulars, rather than providing formed units in their own right, the leadership won’t allow it to be realised.
Of course, by resisting any meaningful change it simply means they get ignored. The ARA leadership don’t want to invest the emotional energy in trying to force through change, so they simply deny the reserves resources, and invest in areas that are proven to be useful instead.
The best thing that could happen to the 2nd division would be to sack everyone above the rank of major.
I have seen two significant restructure proposals in the past 24 months go up towards the boss. Both were stopped along the way by those vested interests, with negative repercussions for at least one author (despite being simply the officer who got the task). With that lesson in mind, why would an ARA person want to touch it....
I'd lower the rank to CAPT, and include WO's. Just to make sure.....