Latest activity
-
VVolkodav reacted to Takao's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with
Like.
So I confess to a little bit of sarcasm above; and I apologise to @Tbone, @Stampede and @Murse for appearing to dismiss them But the... -
VVolkodav reacted to Takao's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Not an option. How do you pay for another SEA 1000? Look how tight the IIP is right now, you can't jam another sub project in there. And...
-
VVolkodav reacted to Stampede's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Apologies in advance but the Collin’s Class expectation is very much a concern for myself. The reality is HMAS Collins was commissioned...
-
VVolkodav reacted to Reptilia's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Hellyer, Jennings, Bergman - same…
-
VVolkodav reacted to iambuzzard's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
We have w@nkers in the hobby industry too!
-
VVolkodav reacted to ADMk2's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Michael is just getting warmed up. He’ll circle this all the way back around as to why we should replace subs with B-21A’s… :rolleyes:
-
SStampede reacted to Murse's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
If you'd said on this forum 10 years ago that we'd be on a pathway to SSN's, you'd be laughed at-at the very least! What that means to...
-
John Fedup replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.SKorea might be able to deliver SSKs earlier than the late 30s but I agree Virginia >AUKUS is the path. Collins upgrade, a real stretch... -
Ssouth reacted to Stampede's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Apologies in advance but the Collin’s Class expectation is very much a concern for myself. The reality is HMAS Collins was commissioned...
-
Takao replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.So I confess to a little bit of sarcasm above; and I apologise to @Tbone, @Stampede and @Murse for appearing to dismiss them But the... -
Takao replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.Not an option. How do you pay for another SEA 1000? Look how tight the IIP is right now, you can't jam another sub project in there. And...
-
Takao reacted to Todjaeger's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Something people need to keep in mind is that the Japanese naval ship (and sub) building industrial capacity has been established and...
-
Takao reacted to Sandson41's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Like some sort of Life-Of-Type-Extension program, maybe? We could ditch fancy ideas like new optronic masts and new engines and save a...
-
Takao replied to the thread Australian Army Discussions and Updates.Which, of course, means that our main land combat power will go without key enablers - like engineers, mortars or ambulances. Good thing...
-
Just seems like an endless run of press releases on “new” spending that had already been announced that then gets slippage or deferred.