Latest activity
-
Takao replied to the thread Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates.The delay for the last two was recognition that P-8s were essential aircraft, and we wanted 15, but had to finagle into an IIP that also... -
MMARKMILES77 replied to the thread Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates.Australian Border Force is getting a significant boost to it's airborne maritime surveillance capability with 3 Bombardier G6500s being...
-
-
John Fedup reacted to swerve's post in the thread Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) News and Discussions with
Like.
Canada received proposals for the E-7, Globaleye & the L3Harris Aeris X. L3Harris's proposal was the same as that to South Korea, where... -
SStevoJH replied to the thread Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates.The Point class were purpose designed and built for the role, with a commercial operator operating them under contract. They were not...
-
SStevoJH reacted to Todjaeger's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Something people need to keep in mind is that the Japanese naval ship (and sub) building industrial capacity has been established and...
-
SStevoJH reacted to SammyC's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
A couple of points. I don't think the weight for the Hunter is in the mast frame. The "heavyness" is in the radar panels and associated...
-
SStampede replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.Apologies in advance but the Collin’s Class expectation is very much a concern for myself. The reality is HMAS Collins was commissioned...
-
Tthatsamguy reacted to Volkodav's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Ah yes, 2+2=742. Michael is yet again proving he is an agenda driven f'wit. The goose claims a lack of transparancy and of any...
-
spoz reacted to ADMk2's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Michael is just getting warmed up. He’ll circle this all the way back around as to why we should replace subs with B-21A’s… :rolleyes: -
spoz reacted to Volkodav's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Ah yes, 2+2=742. Michael is yet again proving he is an agenda driven f'wit. The goose claims a lack of transparancy and of any...
-
AADMk2 replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.Michael is just getting warmed up. He’ll circle this all the way back around as to why we should replace subs with B-21A’s… :rolleyes:
-
AADMk2 reacted to Volkodav's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Ah yes, 2+2=742. Michael is yet again proving he is an agenda driven f'wit. The goose claims a lack of transparancy and of any...
-
VVolkodav replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.Ah yes, 2+2=742. Michael is yet again proving he is an agenda driven f'wit. The goose claims a lack of transparancy and of any...
-
Oold faithful reacted to Bob53's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
He is right though Karen!
-
VVolkodav reacted to SammyC's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
A couple of points. I don't think the weight for the Hunter is in the mast frame. The "heavyness" is in the radar panels and associated...
