Russian Air Force News & Discussion

Feanor

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
wsb05 said:
They probably are unable to produce smaller and larger airplanes sufficiently and on time. Plus the plant could possibly also produce Il-212 and Be-200.
Im not sure why didn't they choose to upgrade Il 76 further
Click to expand...
They could end up using Il-76s where they really need smaller planes, because they're available, but I still think it's a strange decision. It seems likely the PD-8 engine will enter service, and at that point it should be possible to build a 2-engined smaller jet transport.
 
Sandhi Yudha

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
Yes, besides that, next decade Russia will end up with three turbofan transporters which are quite close to each other: Il-212, Il-276 and Il-76MD-90A, without a real replacement for the An-26, An-32 and An-140 turboprops.
 
Terran

Terran

Well-Known Member
Feanor said:
Yes. But...why? What need is there for piles of additional Il-76s? There's already piles of airframes in storage. They don't really have an export market.
Click to expand...
Most of those airframes would cost more to restore than build new. Wiring, structural members plus a lot of those aircraft have been canabilized especially in the post Soviet era. Either picked for parts to keep siblings in flight or to pay for vodka. Then you have conditions. In the US old airplanes are stored in Deserts the Dry climate reduces rust issues the regions of the Soviet Union which were close in climate are now other countries. The Russian Federation boneyards tend to be more temperate with wetter winters and summers leading to corrosion
. Questions on the Russian mothballs process and if it was done correctly can also factor in addition to the condition of the airframe before retirement. Russian airfields are generally rougher than western that places stress on the aircraft too.

On the plus side for Russia they didn’t dismantle the facilities to the same degree as other projects so they can build new though it will take time. On the Downside This war hasn’t helped the Russian military who was likely already owner the oldest of the air frames. The Recent Operation Spiders web may not have destroyed active Be 50 but blowing up drones on the source of spare parts is attributable.
Sandhi Yudha said:
Yes, besides that, next decade Russia will end up with three turbofan transporters which are quite close to each other: Il-212, Il-276 and Il-76MD-90A, without a real replacement for the An-26, An-32 and An-140 turboprops.
Click to expand...
….
Considering the track record for Russian military procurement… that’s Optimistic.
 
Sandhi Yudha

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
Terran said:
Most of those airframes would cost more to restore than build new. Wiring, structural members plus a lot of those aircraft have been canabilized especially in the post Soviet era. Either picked for parts to keep siblings in flight or to pay for vodka. Then you have conditions. In the US old airplanes are stored in Deserts the Dry climate reduces rust issues the regions of the Soviet Union which were close in climate are now other countries. The Russian Federation boneyards tend to be more temperate with wetter winters and summers leading to corrosion
. Questions on the Russian mothballs process and if it was done correctly can also factor in addition to the condition of the airframe before retirement. Russian airfields are generally rougher than western that places stress on the aircraft too.

On the plus side for Russia they didn’t dismantle the facilities to the same degree as other projects so they can build new though it will take time. On the Downside This war hasn’t helped the Russian military who was likely already owner the oldest of the air frames. The Recent Operation Spiders web may not have destroyed active Be 50 but blowing up drones on the source of spare parts is attributable.
….
Considering the track record for Russian military procurement… that’s Optimistic.
Click to expand...
Yes, maybe too optimistic. The Il-276 still only exist on paper.
 
Ananda

Ananda

The Bunker Group

If the numbers and condition of Rusian Military Airlift is correct, then the need for more IL-76-90a seems justifiable. It is needed to replace not only older first gen IL-76, but also AN-22. Infact with the potential no replacement for AN-124, more IL-76-90a could be needed. After all it is the only big transport that will be keep on production line, let alone potential export.

Feanor said:
It seems likely the PD-8 engine will enter service, and at that point it should be possible to build a 2-engined smaller jet transport.
Click to expand...
Will there be enough PD-8 for military purpose? Looking on the need of SSJ-100 for Russian domestic airliners, seems it will take years before there will be enough PD-8 for military use. They seems will go for turboprop IL-112V first before enough PD-8 for IL-276.
 
Last edited:
Sandhi Yudha

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
Ananda said:

If the numbers and condition of Rusian Military Airlift is correct, then the need for more IL-76-90a seems justifiable. It is needed to replace not only older first gen IL-76, but also AN-22. Infact with the potential no replacement for AN-124, more IL-76-90a could be needed. After all it is the only big transport that will be keep on production line, let alone potential export.



Will there be enough PD-8 for military purpose ? Looking on the need of SSJ-100 for Russian domestic airliners, seems it will take years before there will be enough PD-8 for military use. They seems will go for turboprop IL-112V first before enough PD-8 for IL-276.
Click to expand...
Wait, i thought they abandoned the original Il-112V design with the Klimov TV7-117ST turboprops. Or do you mean the Il-114-300?
 
Ananda

Ananda

The Bunker Group
IL-114-300 is for regional airliner and IL-112V is for Military Transport. I see conflicting report on IL-112V future, between postponed or delay, but so far not completely abandoned.

I might be wrong, but twin turboprop military transport seems getting more priority against twin turbofan military transport. At least the priority lists for military transport that I can gather is IL-76-90a, then IL-112V and third priority goes tp IL-276. Thus IL-114-300 is different program lists.
 
Ananda

Ananda

The Bunker Group

This video talk about using new light weight matterials to reduce weight of Russian engines. Interesting it is talk the materials will.also be use for PS-90a and not just new gen engines like PD-8, PD-14 and PD-35. Shown eventough it is older design engine, but Russia will continue retain that engine.

In my opinion it is not matter PS-90a already proven, but also there will be limited production capacity for new gen engines. Shown Il-76-90a, Il-96-400M, Tu-214M continue will be mainstay for both Russia military and commercial needs for at least until end of this to early next decade. All before enough capacities being build for new gen engines and planes.
 
Sandhi Yudha

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
Ananda said:

This video talk about using new light weight matterials to reduce weight of Russian engines. Interesting it is talk the materials will.also be use for PS-90a and not just new gen engines like PD-8, PD-14 and PD-35. Shown eventough it is older design engine, but Russia will continue retain that engine.

In my opinion it is not matter PS-90a already proven, but also there will be limited production capacity for new gen engines. Shown Il-76-90a, Il-96-400M, Tu-214M continue will be mainstay for both Russia military and commercial needs for at least until end of this to early next decade. All before enough capacities being build for new gen engines and planes.
Click to expand...
Besides that, a new engine also means that those three aircraft types need again a modification/modernisation.
 
Feanor

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Ananda said:

From the progress, got impression that SSJ with PD-8 and this IL-114-300 are more ready them MC-21. This seems why Tu-214 with PS-90a still being produce.
Click to expand...
The Tu-214 production is a different factory from the MS-21 production. And the MS-21 is in an... unclear state. Tu-214 is available and is being made for government services primarily. Also Tu-214 production is proceeding at a snails pace.

I wouldn't be surprised if the SSJ with PD-8 was ready first, KnAAPO has now over a decade of experience in producing passenger aircraft, and the Sukhoi design bureau is probably the most substantial such organization in Russian aerospace. As to the Il-114, it's mostly just an engine problem. The Il-114 itself is a Soviet-era project that was initially completed in the mid-'90s. There's no reason Russia can't produce an updated version of it. In a pre-sanctions world it wouldn't have been economically viable but now it's less about competing in open markets and more about meeting domestic needs when alternatives aren't available.
 
Sandhi Yudha

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member

They are working for years on the UZGA LMS-901 Baikal, as a replacement for the An-2, but how is the situation with the Myasishchev M-101T? It is smaller than the LMS-901, with only a capacity of 7 passengers and it uses the Czech Walter M601F engine. I understand that from 2022 it is very hard for Russia to buy foreign aircraft engines, but the Wikipedia page gives me the impression that only a handfull of M-101Ts are built before 2022.
 
Ananda

Ananda

The Bunker Group

Seems officialy Russian acknowledge their Airlines don't have much more time to operate Airbus and Boeing in the fleet. High costs of parts already increase the cost of flying and canibalisation. All indication shown their Airlines and commercial aviation is the biggest sector that being hit by Western sanctions.

All this because domestic commercial industry is the biggest sector that being neglected after the fall of USSR. Trying to revive it will be daunting tasks, and even if Tu-214, IL-114 and SSJ-100 are in considerable population in next three years, it is still won't be enough to replace all their Boeing and Airbuses.

Well Iran manage to operate their old Airbus and Boeing aftee 40 years of sanctions. Russia in my opinion need at least a decade for their domestic commercial airliners replacing all their airlines narrow body Airbus and Boeing. Just don't see enough intention from Russia to build enough IL-96-400M to replace all their A330 let alone A350 and 777. Seems they have to wait China to build non western version of C929 and C939 later on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top