because its absolutely irrelevant. who has the more competent airforce? france or china? so who cares how big it is if its fractured in capability?gf; one last time; WORLD'S LARGEST AIR FORCE.
Not a single post has even addressed this. Why?
because nothing has been credibly demonstrated to show that they can even remotely provide those "4 P's" of superiority.Command of the air has been proven to be the decisive issue in every Amphibious assault since 1940. Why not here?
volume has little relevance if its inappropriate.
again, the attacking force has taxis with what credible organic anti-air?25% subtraction; 1) Helecopters can be shot down 2) Previously stated handicap when you are carrying a mixed load 3) even hellfires can miss, or hit a wave, or missfire... as i am sure the competition pointed out when Taiwan considered bying them in the first place.
the airforce has to demonstrate saturated persistence, and that provides advantage to the defender as they kill anything in the box - they don't have to send up anything while they engage in a 21st century version of the Marianas
you still need to provide some semblance of reference as to how you are factoring a 25% degradation in assets.
I'm not contesting that degradation happens, I'm questioning the quantum and how you came to the number in the first place.
I'm certainly contesting the notion that a maritime force based on the PLAN's and chinese merchant fleet is able to cross and defend with any degree of military satisfaction.
I'd suggest that you make an effort to remind him - as I will.As for my credentials, I want to send them in to Webmaster, but he has yet to get back to me with a Fax Number or a PO box.