It depends mostly on the weapon, sensor and fire control/EW fitouts, plus the manning complement. For example the Australia ANZAC class frigates were considered relatively "low cost", however they were not equipped for modern warfare from the start having only a 5inch gun, 8x Seasparrow SAM's, Mod 46 Torpedo's and 0.50cal HMG's as their armament.I am trying to get a grasp on the prices paid for various types of modern warships; for Ex a frigate or SS or OPV. Any info is appreciated
Thanks
Hard to say accurately as exchange rates, inflation, etc. differ from when they where built. Roughly put, around M190$ apiece, with most of the fitout, but sans missiles.Any idea of the cost of an Absalon? Or, what the different options for an Absalon cost?
Indeed, and that's why today's destroyers have the size of yesterday's cruisers, and today's frigates have the size of yesterday's destroyers, etcAnd yet a simple 1800 ton OPV such as the Irish Roisin without a combat data weapons system, i.e. the expensive targeting computers for the anti-air missiles and gun systems, runs around M 30-40 Euros. A third or possibly half the price of a corvette or a small frigate is its combat data weapons systems, not the size of the hull.
With combat data weapons systems, its not the missile launcher, or radar mast, or the gun, its the sophisticated electronics and computers of the combat data weapons systems. Steel is cheap compared to these electronics.
According to the UK MoD, has been removed from the Website now, btw.'A Horizon DDG costs M800 €, whilst the Herakles equipped FREMM (ASW or Land Attack/GP) comes in at approx. M400 '
How does this compare to the cost of the UK Type 45?
Interesting. At current exchange rates, 860 million euro per ship excl R&D and fixed costs. 7% more expensive than the Horizon/Forbin/Doria in exchange for a more powerful phased array radar (but no SSMs, no CIWS, no ASW... and exactly the same SAMs).According to the UK MoD, has been removed from the Website now, btw.
"Unit Production Cost (UPC) in 2004 was £576M per ship (note: UPC excludes cost of development and 'cost of capital' charges)"
I'm not that knowledgeable regarding the Horizon. But do they also have electric drives etc. like the Type 45?Interesting. At current exchange rates, 860 million euro per ship excl R&D and fixed costs. 7% more expensive than the Horizon/Forbin/Doria in exchange for a more powerful phased array radar (but no SSMs, no CIWS, no ASW... and exactly the same SAMs).
I'd still invest in a Horizon which has better multi-purpose equipment. Though the larger Royal Navy can afford dedicated ships.
cheers
I'm not sure I understand your question.I'm not that knowledgeable regarding the Horizon. But do they also have electric drives etc. like the Type 45?
This is what I mean.I'm not sure I understand your question.
If you are referring to electric engines for special manoeuvring (and as a support to the LM2500 GE/Avio turbines) yes they do have them.
cheers
Drive time: firing up electric propulsion
By John Kenkel
Although electric drive systems have been in service on commercial vessels for a number of years, the requirements for more robust military missions have so far limited its use on military vessels.
The biggest hurdle for military vessels has been the size of currently available electric drive systems: there is simply no room aboard most surface combatants for a majority of the large and inefficient systems currently in operation.
There are four main technologies set to overcome these limitations and meet emerging military demand for electric drive systems. Two are currently operational and in use with modern military vessels and two are still in development to meet next-generation demands.
Advanced Induction Systems (AIS) are the furthest along in terms of development and variants are being integrated into the UK's Type 45 Daring-class frigates, as well as the USN's DDG-1000 (Flight 0) destroyer and Lewis and Clarke-class T-AKE replenishment ships.
The major competitor in terms of current technology is the Permanent Magnet Motor (PMM) concept, designed initially for small vessels and considered to be the most technically advanced electric drive system currently operational.
The DDG-1000 Flight 1 programme is driving the further development of advanced superconducting motor technology, with a partnership between American Surperconductors and Northrop Grumman pushing the High Temperature Superconductor (HTS) ship-propulsion motor, which is currently the subject of a phase of research-and-development trials with the USN.
The least developed, but potentially most advanced system is the Superconducting Homopolar Motor (SCHM) being developed by General Atomics. The SCHM is a DC motor, affording much reduced acoustic signatures, while still producing full torque at low speeds, making the technology ideal for submarines.
http://www.janes.com/defence/naval_forces/news/jni/jni061017_1_n.shtml