British Army News and Discussion

swerve

Super Moderator
News - Watchkeeper UAV to retire

A classic sad story of British military procurement. Buy an existing product, then spend a fortune & many years modifying it before finally putting it into service, by which time it looks distinctly old-fashioned & only lasts a few years in service.

And everything requires new facilities! Often, a new factory for the new product, & the training of a new workforce.
 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
News - Watchkeeper UAV to retire

A classic sad story of British military procurement. Buy an existing product, then spend a fortune & many years modifying it before finally putting it into service, by which time it looks distinctly old-fashioned & only lasts a few years in service.

And everything requires new facilities! Often, a new factory for the new product, & the training of a new workforce.
|"It is one of several platforms that are being sunset early to save money ahead of the UK's upcoming Strategic Defense Review."|

And they claim this is all to save money....
 

StobieWan

Super Moderator
Staff member
News - Watchkeeper UAV to retire

A classic sad story of British military procurement. Buy an existing product, then spend a fortune & many years modifying it before finally putting it into service, by which time it looks distinctly old-fashioned & only lasts a few years in service.

And everything requires new facilities! Often, a new factory for the new product, & the training of a new workforce.
We really do need to let go of that special snowflake feeling that seems to overcome purchasing so often and just buy something that works as nearly off the shelf as possible. Stuff like Ajax and Boxer flip flop really do stick in my craw, as it were.
 

swerve

Super Moderator
Yeah. We should have bought Boxer from the start. Quitting the programme, faffing around with other types, then rejoining, cost a bloody fortune.
 

koxinga

Well-Known Member
So Starmer offers troops on the ground

Most of what I read online suggest the British Army does not have the numbers needed to sustain a presence (with rotation) for long duration.

 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
So Starmer offers troops on the ground

Most of what I read online suggest the British Army does not have the numbers needed to sustain a presence (with rotation) for long duration.

The British army isn't alone wrt this problem. Canada certainly has!
 

StobieWan

Super Moderator
Staff member
The UK maintained a force of around 10,000 at longer distances over an air bridge in Afghanistan - and we're just talking a trip-wire force in Ukraine - not conducting daily COIN and force protection for example.

Stick a few thousand French and UK troops in there and Russia is facing two nuclear armed nations with the capability to escalate conventionally in ways Russia can't cope with.

If we can get everyone to stop shooting each other, it's doable.
 
Top