Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0

Reptilia

Well-Known Member
Hence the GP Frigate program.

What would also be good is some sort of drone carrier / helicopter carrier.

Basically the majors and subs, working with the RAAF providing overwatch, while the GPFs and drone carriers sanitise the tactical space allowing the amphibs access.
Damen have a drone carrier with just 48 crew.
 

StevoJH

The Bunker Group
Damen have a drone carrier with just 48 crew.
It will be very interesting to see how the Portuguese utilise it and what drones they fly off it. Only one of the deck spots is really large enough for a full sized helicopter so that sort of limits the size of the platforms they can choose.

A large quadcopter capable of dropping sensors and LWT torpedos could be extremely useful if they have sufficient radius of operation.
 

koxinga

Well-Known Member
Government announces Damen LST-100 selected for Army Landing Craft Heavy.


Hot off the press, Austal to build 8 x Damen LST-100 at Henderson WA probably commencing in 2026. Displacing 3,900 tonnes and capable of carrying six Abrams MBT, 11 Reback IFV or 26 HIMARS.

A decent size, the former HMAS Tobruk was around 6,000 FL tons.
In case anyone is interested, Nigeria ordered these LST-100s awhile back and was built in the UAE. Here are how they look like.





 

Lofty_DBF

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
A large quadcopter capable of dropping sensors and LWT torpedos could be extremely useful if they have sufficient radius of operation.
Unless these vessels are capable of tracking a submarine, carrying LWT's is a waste of time.
Skimmers carrying LWT'S is a waste of space.
 

MickB

Well-Known Member
At present the Army is operating 15 110t, 22m LCM-8 with a crew of one JNCO and 2 Privates, they are being replaced by 18 500t, 50m LCMs that are going to require a larger crew, possibly under the command of a SNCO. On top of this we are getting 8 4000t, 100m LSTs that require a crew of 16-18 probably under a Junior Officer, SNCO, several JNCOs as well as 8-12 Privates. Water Tpt is going to have to be dramatically increased in size, with all the career opportunities that will bring.
Water Transport is going to go through a massive revolution right across the board, comparing personnel numbers it to previous requirements is somewhat pointless.
If these ships are to be used just as transports then I agree with army crews. but if you include remote mcm or survey then RAN seems the way to go.
 

OldTex

Well-Known Member
If these ships are to be used just as transports then I agree with army crews. but if you include remote mcm or survey then RAN seems the way to go.
There would be better designs to support hydrographic survey, MCM and clearance diving than this LST design. If the roles were to be bolted onto the littoral manoeuvre role for which they are being acquired then there would need to be more of them, potential at least 12 and possibly up to 16.
 

Richo99

Active Member
There would be better designs to support hydrographic survey, MCM and clearance diving than this LST design. If the roles were to be bolted onto the littoral manoeuvre role for which they are being acquired then there would need to be more of them, potential at least 12 and possibly up to 16.
Does it actually say mcm anywhere? Could it be minelaying? Lots if carrying capacity, cranes, rear ramp....
 

Redlands18

Well-Known Member

3 designs. 1 Mitsubishi, 2 TKMS.
Not yet clear which Mogami design. Anyone wanna guess which 2 from TKMS? A200(Aus spec?), A210 would seem unlikely.
Mogami-class frigate - Wikipedia
133m makes it the original Mogami class, the upgraded Mogami is 142m. 121m means the A200, differences between the 2 different specs, we will have to wait and see.
 

Reptilia

Well-Known Member
Mogami-class frigate - Wikipedia
133m makes it the original Mogami class, the upgraded Mogami is 142m. 121m means the A200, differences between the 2 different specs, we will have to wait and see.
In that article it says mogami or 30FFM, several others say upgraded or new Mogami or new version of the Mogami.
A200 could mean Aus spec or other countries current A200 design.

My guess would be 2x A200. 1xAus spec, (batch IV-sea giraffe) and 1x existing(batch III egyptian variant) as stated in this article below.


+ the Upgraded Mogami as is, possibly with the export mast.


3 Hobarts -144 cells
6 Hunters -192 cells
11 Upgraded Mogami(32 mk41 SL VLS) or Meko a200(Egypt-32 mica NG VLS) or Meko a210(32 mk41 SL VLS) -352 cells
6 LOSVs -192 cells

= 880 -Mr Conroy.

Would fall well short of 880 cells with…
Mogami 30FFM = 16 TL mk 41 VLS
Meko A200(Batch IV) = 16 TL mk 41 VLS (maybe modifications could change that, getting rid of the secondary gun platform or making it smaller and replacing it with a dew?)

Eg
 

Attachments

Last edited:

iambuzzard

Well-Known Member
In case anyone is interested, Nigeria ordered these LST-100s awhile back and was built in the UAE. Here are how they look like.





I
In case anyone is interested, Nigeria ordered these LST-100s awhile back and was built in the UAE. Here are how they look like.





It looks quite an effective platform. A decent sized flight deck, plenty of space forward of the bridge for containerized loads (with the crane), and Roll On/Roll Off below the main deck. My concern is what will be the self defense fit out? A 25mm or 30mm Typhoon mount up forward makes sense with an excellent arc of fire, but I'm wondering what else apart from 50 calibre mounts could be fitted. It needs a decent CIWS. Phalanx and SeaRam would be problematic, but perhaps there is something smaller and self contained that could be located on the deck. Any thoughts?
 

Reptilia

Well-Known Member
I

It looks quite an effective platform. A decent sized flight deck, plenty of space forward of the bridge for containerized loads (with the crane), and Roll On/Roll Off below the main deck. My concern is what will be the self defense fit out? A 25mm or 30mm Typhoon mount up forward makes sense with an excellent arc of fire, but I'm wondering what else apart from 50 calibre mounts could be fitted. It needs a decent CIWS. Phalanx and SeaRam would be problematic, but perhaps there is something smaller and self contained that could be located on the deck. Any thoughts?
Containerised self defense systems maybe + 25-30mm up front.
Once again, 4 vessel spaces on top of the deck could have have been useful as duel purpose platforms.
-USV for mcm or surveillance, fire support, RCWS, DEW or kamikaze
-combat craft
-UUV, speartooth/ghostvshark, other
-UAV
-10-20ft containers
-electronic warfare
-light landing craft
-patrol boat like the whiskey project with spike nlos or something else
-etc etc
 
Last edited:

Redlands18

Well-Known Member
I

It looks quite an effective platform. A decent sized flight deck, plenty of space forward of the bridge for containerized loads (with the crane), and Roll On/Roll Off below the main deck. My concern is what will be the self defense fit out? A 25mm or 30mm Typhoon mount up forward makes sense with an excellent arc of fire, but I'm wondering what else apart from 50 calibre mounts could be fitted. It needs a decent CIWS. Phalanx and SeaRam would be problematic, but perhaps there is something smaller and self contained that could be located on the deck. Any thoughts?
The Nigerian vessel lacks the Davits for carrying small boats such as the planned Riverine Patrol boats, that has been shown on the Damen site and the picture released by Defence. I suspect the ADF vessels will come fitted with the davits as transporting the patrol boats will be a major role for these ships.
 

Volkodav

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
There would be better designs to support hydrographic survey, MCM and clearance diving than this LST design. If the roles were to be bolted onto the littoral manoeuvre role for which they are being acquired then there would need to be more of them, potential at least 12 and possibly up to 16.
Ironically some or most of these mission sets are listed for the Mogami class FFMs.

These really may be replacing not just the ANZACs, but the OPVs, MCMVs, hydrographic vessels etc.

If you look at the history of the FFM, it started as Japan's LCS but then traded speed for survivability and combat power.
 

Redlands18

Well-Known Member
Ironically some or most of these mission sets are listed for the Mogami class FFMs.

These really may be replacing not just the ANZACs, but the OPVs, MCMVs, hydrographic vessels etc.

If you look at the history of the FFM, it started as Japan's LCS but then traded speed for survivability and combat power.
A real Jack of all trades but still capable in those trades, anything from convoy escort to supporting a landing or MCM work.
 

Volkodav

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
A real Jack of all trades but still capable in those trades, anything from convoy escort to supporting a landing or MCM work.
They will be, at last, a modern day replacement for the Bathurst Class Corvettes and River Class Frigates of WWII.

There were multiple attempts from the 60s onwards to build a class of useful, survivable combatants in decent numbers, to supplement the major combatants. Every time they ended up growing too much and being cancelled or actually ended up as compromised replacements for the majors.

We always seemed to end up with the worst of both worlds. Our majors were ordered too small so as to free up cash for greater numbers, but then the greater numbers were never ordered.

Arguably for the numbers we have had, we should have had DLGs or helicopter cruisers, instead of DDGs, and DDGs instead of frigates. Then instead of the MEKO ANZACs, OHP FFGs.
 

SammyC

Well-Known Member
I spent the day reading up on the Bathurst class. I didn't realise we had a fleet of 60 of them during the war. Several mothballed ship yards were opened in a hurry to make them (evidently the industry had atrophied prior to the war, sounds familiar). At the peak two were punched out per month.

I enjoyed reading about HMAS Pirie, which had a mutiny. Aparently the captain was horrible and made his sailors live onboard while he went to a hotel. 2/3 of the crew refused to report for duty. He sent an armed guard to surround the ship. Sounds very Australian.

The Bathursts were put to service after the war clearing the thousands of mines laid by both sides (took ages to complete), and three were present for the Japanese surrender in Toyko Bay. The last one went in 1960, HMAS Wagga.

Heaps of them saw serious combat. HMAS Armidale was sunk following an air attack. Teddy Shean was on Armidale and his story is well known. Armidale went into hostile territory, probably beyond her means to adequately defend against, in order to evacuate troops. She went down fighting.

HMAS Warnambool was sunk by a mine (an Australian one) after the war.

83 sailors died on Bathurst class ships. May their service and sacrifice always be remembered.
 

iambuzzard

Well-Known Member
In case anyone is interested, Nigeria ordered these LST-100s awhile back and was built in the UAE. Here are how they look like.





I
I spent the day reading up on the Bathurst class. I didn't realise we had a fleet of 60 of them during the war. Several mothballed ship yards were opened in a hurry to make them (evidently the industry had atrophied prior to the war, sounds familiar). At the peak two were punched out per month.

I enjoyed reading about HMAS Pirie, which had a mutiny. Aparently the captain was horrible and made his sailors live onboard while he went to a hotel. 2/3 of the crew refused to report for duty. He sent an armed guard to surround the ship. Sounds very Australian.

The Bathursts were put to service after the war clearing the thousands of mines laid by both sides (took ages to complete), and three were present for the Japanese surrender in Toyko Bay. The last one went in 1960, HMAS Wagga.

Heaps of them saw serious combat. HMAS Armidale was sunk following an air attack. Teddy Shean was on Armidale and his story is well known. Armidale went into hostile territory, probably beyond her means to adequately defend against, in order to evacuate troops. She went down fighting.

HMAS Warnambool was sunk by a mine (an Australian one) after the war.

83 sailors died on Bathurst class ships. May their service and sacrifice always be remembered.
HMAS Castlemaine is at Williamstown and well maintained by the museum volunteers. I have been on her.
HMAS Whyalla is on display in Whyalla.
 
Top