Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force Thread

Redlands18

Well-Known Member
I couldn’t pass this by, it gives a real perspective re “armour” defences in naval ships of the first half of the 20th century
This 26” thick armour has been breached by a 16* shell!
Got no idea where that armour comes from but it's certainly not a Yamato, no US Battleship ever fired on a Yamato, both were sunk by carrier aircraft.
 
This was most likely a piece of extra / spare / R&D armor used during testing in Japan before being captured by the US after the Japanese surrender. But this is most likely just a very close range (50 meter?) and 90 degrees hit by a 16 inch shell on this piece of armor so this does not prove much for practical penetration. This sort of data is only useful if you have comparative data under similar test conditions.

I had some time to look this picture up and this short video explains the what and why of this piece of armor.

 
Last edited:

Redlands18

Well-Known Member
This was most likely a piece of extra / spare / R&D armor used during testing in Japan before being captured by the US after the Japanese surrender. But this is most likely just a very close range (50 meter?) and 90 degrees hit by a 16 inch shell on this piece of armor so this does not prove much for practical penetration. This sort of data is only useful if you have comparative data under similar test conditions.

I had some time to look this picture up and this short video explains the what and why of this piece of armor.

Thanks for clearing that up, the test was done at 400ft (121m) it is in the video.
 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
Two days ago around 22:30 local time during a night exercise, contact was lost with two JMSDF helicopters near the Izu-islands, 600 km south-east of Tokyo. One body of a crew member has already been recovered, but seven more crew members are still missing.

There is no information in this news article about the type of helicopters, but it was an anti-submarine exercise, so i expect these are two Sikorsky/Mitsubishi H-60 ASW-helicopters.

The two helicopters were near Torishima.




Japan's coastguard service has ordered three more Eurocopter EC225 twin-engine helicopters. This latest order brings the Japan Coast Guard's total EC225 fleet to 18.

 

Salinger

Member
Two days ago around 22:30 local time during a night exercise, contact was lost with two JMSDF helicopters near the Izu-islands, 600 km south-east of Tokyo. One body of a crew member has already been recovered, but seven more crew members are still missing.

There is no information in this news article about the type of helicopters, but it was an anti-submarine exercise, so i expect these are two Sikorsky/Mitsubishi H-60 ASW-helicopters.

The two helicopters were near Torishima.




Japan's coastguard service has ordered three more Eurocopter EC225 twin-engine helicopters. This latest order brings the Japan Coast Guard's total EC225 fleet to 18.

Maritime Self-Defense Force helicopter crash: 1 dead, 7 missing
On the 23rd, the Japan Maritime Staff Office released the names of the eight crew members involved in an accident in which two SH60K patrol helicopters of the Maritime Self-Defense Force crashed during a night training exercise in the waters east of Torishima in the Izu Islands. One person is dead and seven people are missing.

The two aircraft are "unit 8416" assigned to Omura Air Base (Nagasaki Prefecture) and "unit 8443" assigned to Komatsushima Air Base (Tokushima Prefecture). There were four people on board each, including the captain, co-pilot, and two navigators.

The accident occurred on the night of the 20th in waters approximately 270 kilometers east of Torishima. The two planes were engaged in anti-submarine training, and the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force believes there is a high possibility that they collided in mid-air.

According to the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force, the two aircraft belong to Omura Air Base (Nagasaki Prefecture) and Komatsushima Air Base (Tokushima Prefecture). At that time, a large-scale training exercise was being carried out involving eight ships, six helicopters, and one submarine belonging to the 4th Escort Group (Kure City, Hiroshima Prefecture), two of which were the Aegis destroyer "Haguro" and a destroyer. It was installed on "Kirisame". The training was inspected by the escort fleet commander, the top of the escort fleet.
 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
On this official JMSDF-tweet we can see the Yahagi (with pennant number FFM-5), the newest Mogami-class frigate being inducted into Escort Division 14, yesterday on 21 May.

The JMSDF had originally planned to build a total of 22 30FFM Mogami-class frigates. These 30FFM multi-mission frigates have a full load displacement of about 5500 tons and a length of 132,5 meters.
However, it has decided to now procure a total of only 12 such frigates until the current fiscal year 2023, with plans to acquire a new class of 12 FFMs from 2024 until 2028. The new frigates will essentially be improved Mogami-class ships that are set to be built to the design proposed by MHI, actually an improved second batch.

This new-class FFM will be fitted with longer-range missiles, enhanced anti-submarine capabilities, and improved capabilities for various maritime operations.


 

Ananda

The Bunker Group
So they recycle the namesake of IJN Last Light Cruiser. The one that sunk together with Yamato. Will they then going to recycle Yamato or Musashi name sake? Perhaps for their plan over blown destroyer.
 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
So they recycle the namesake of IJN Last Light Cruiser. The one that sunk together with Yamato. Will they then going to recycle Yamato or Musashi name sake? Perhaps for their plan over blown destroyer.
Officially the frigate was named after the Yahagi River (矢作川, Yahagi-gawa) that flows through Nagano. But it is for the most of us just unpredictable which names they will (re)use for the future giant AEGIS-cruisers.
 

Redlands18

Well-Known Member
So they recycle the namesake of IJN Last Light Cruiser. The one that sunk together with Yamato. Will they then going to recycle Yamato or Musashi name sake? Perhaps for their plan over blown destroyer.
Always have a bit of a chuckle whenever I see a Soryu class Sub at Pearl Harbour.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group
I remember long time ago when I'm still at 5th grade, I read Indonesian translation of Capt Tameichi Hara memoar of his commands during the war. From his first destroyer Amatsukaze to his last the Light Cruiser Yahagi. Which he himself seems amaze that he still alive, as Yahagi last trip he knows supposedly one way trip.

Anyway then I realize later on most of the IJN namesake that he mentioned has been mostly recycle by JMSDF. Now come Yahagi, which makes me wonder when Yamato and Musashi will come out. Perhaps will be too controversial, as those name represents the culmination of IJN Battleships and then Imperial Japanese ambition.

However who knows. Perhaps they will reinvigorate Japanese national spirit for 'self defense'.
 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
I remember long time ago when I'm still at 5th grade, I read Indonesian translation of Capt Tameichi Hara memoar of his commands during the war. From his first destroyer Amatsukaze to his last the Light Cruiser Yahagi. Which he himself seems amaze that he still alive, as Yahagi last trip he knows supposedly one way trip.

Anyway then I realize later on most of the IJN namesake that he mentioned has been mostly recycle by JMSDF. Now come Yahagi, which makes me wonder when Yamato and Musashi will come out. Perhaps will be too controversial, as those name represents the culmination of IJN Battleships and then Imperial Japanese ambition.

However who knows. Perhaps they will reinvigorate Japanese national spirit for 'self defense'.
Probably slightly more probable than Germany naming a new warship Bismarck.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group

Xavier video with Japanese Head RnD of Japanese defense procurement agency (ATLA). Basically he give broad explanation of what Japan looking for future Submarines and Destroyers.

The Destroyers actually shown something that can compete with China Type 055, with Laser and Rail Gun as standard. While for Submarines even tough they envision better under sea range and handling, however extended network to be able controlling UUV.
 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
According to Rolls-Royce, the MT-30 is selected by Japan for the furure Aegis System Equipped Vessel (ASEV) cruisers. The MT30 has 80% commonality with the Trent 800, one of the engine options for the Boeing 777.

The power rating is between 25-40 MW, which seems to be enough for these huge vessels, but that is actually not surprising, because the MT-30 is already in use for the Zumwalt class cruisers, the Trieste and the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers (two on each vessel).

 

Ananda

The Bunker Group
The CG channel finally make overall CG rendering for all 25 IJN Aircraft Carriers.


This include the Fleet Carrier and Escort Carrier. Quite interesting effort they make on CG rendering, and for me basically shown overall history of IJN carriers group.
 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
Some additional information about design considerations for Japan’s future air defence destroyers.

Thanks for sharing.
|"Further future requirements for 13DDX include a compact design; ...."|
So this is a new destroyer class under development which is a different class than the "Aegis system equipped vessels" (ASEV) which have the size of heavy cruisers, right?
 
Last edited:

Redlands18

Well-Known Member
Thanks for sharing.
|"Further future requirements for 13DDX include a compact design; ...."|
So this is a new destroyer class under development which is a different class than the "Aegis system equipped vessels" (ASEV) which has the size of heavy cruisers, right?
I think these are the replacements for the Burke derivatives, Kongo and Atago classes. Which are getting quite long in the Tooth, Kongo is 31yo.
 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
Thanks for sharing.
|"Further future requirements for 13DDX include a compact design; ...."|
So this is a new destroyer class under development which is a different class than the "Aegis system equipped vessels" (ASEV) which have the size of heavy cruisers, right?
As per Redlands 18 post, yes this future destroyer is different from ASEV and is a replacement for the Burke derivatives with lots of new technology.
 
Top