British Army News and Discussion

Bob53

Well-Known Member
14 is what is available for immediate acquisitions and rapid fielding.
Only 48 operational systems exist. Sweden had 24 in service, 24 in storage/reserve. Last year Sweden ordered an additional 24 new systems on a new chassis (Rheinmetall HX2 8x8). They are transferring 8 to Ukraine, selling 14 to the UK, retaining 24 in service & 2 in storage/reserve. Sweden's new systems acquisition is planned to be completed in 2025. If the UK ordered new weapons they could not expect to receive them for several years. The British Army had already been evaluating the system under the Mobile Fires Platform (MFP) program. This acquisition has been reported as only an interim solution pending the results of the MFP program.
14 systems give the British Army enough to field 2 batteries with 2 systems for training/reserve
Archer is
Thanks understood
 

ngatimozart

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Something that caught me by surprise - the CG back in UK service:


Didn't expect that system to be procured, be interesting to see how things go with it in service - the US appears to quite like it.
By all accounts its an ideal weapons system even if it's aging. It mightn't be able to take out modern MBTs but it still can incapacitate them, knockout structures , knock holes in buildings, machine gun nests etc. The NZ Army has both it and Javelin.
 

Redlands18

Well-Known Member
By all accounts its an ideal weapons system even if it's aging. It mightn't be able to take out modern MBTs but it still can incapacitate them, knockout structures , knock holes in buildings, machine gun nests etc. The NZ Army has both it and Javelin.
Affectionately known as the Charlie Guts-ache in the Australian Army.
If my memory serves me correctly, the Australian Army ordered several hundred M-4 models a year or so back to replace earlier models. Its a bit like the C-130, just keep improving the basic model.
 

StobieWan

Super Moderator
Staff member
It's not your dad's CG for sure:


Confined space rounds, lifted straight from the AT4 and a lot more besides. Also, 2.8 kg lighter, which is significant.

Putin will definitely be getting a Christmas card from SAAB.
 

swerve

Super Moderator
Something that caught me by surprise - the CG back in UK service:


Didn't expect that system to be procured, be interesting to see how things go with it in service - the US appears to quite like it.
Don't the Ukrainians have some? Ukraine's been an excellent proving ground.
 

StobieWan

Super Moderator
Staff member
Don't the Ukrainians have some? Ukraine's been an excellent proving ground.
I think at this point Ukraine have at least two of everything ever made - they may have some '44 stock of Panzerfaust in service by now.

Sweden donated some M4's earlier - I'd imagine for house clearance/CQB work, they'd be great, pop a round into the upper story of a target building and then count the body parts afterwards.

Right now, if I were a major arms supplier and my government hadn't donated anything, I'd be sending some over and writing it off against tax. That "battle proven" sticker on the catalogue is just too tempting.
 

ngatimozart

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
I think at this point Ukraine have at least two of everything ever made - they may have some '44 stock of Panzerfaust in service by now.
Well they are using Maxim water cooled machine guns circa Soviet 1930s - 40s, c/w armoured shield and mounted on a small trailer.
 

Volkodav

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
I think at this point Ukraine have at least two of everything ever made - they may have some '44 stock of Panzerfaust in service by now.

Sweden donated some M4's earlier - I'd imagine for house clearance/CQB work, they'd be great, pop a round into the upper story of a target building and then count the body parts afterwards.

Right now, if I were a major arms supplier and my government hadn't donated anything, I'd be sending some over and writing it off against tax. That "battle proven" sticker on the catalogue is just too tempting.
M4, the Ranger skeleton key. Guaranteed to open any door.
 

StobieWan

Super Moderator
Staff member
SAS has been requested to be on standby for CT operations that would have typically been handled by Met armed officers
Ah, SAS on CT in mainland Britain. Nothing going wrong there.

Their brand is still good with juries so they're likely to be far safer than the average met office copper.

My favourite quote from the Gibraltar trial relating to the shooting of what turned out to be an unarmed IRA unit.
When asking the anonymous trooper why he'd shot the suspect 17 times, the trooper replied "I had a stoppage"

I do sympathise with the police here, they're asked to face impossible challenges and then thrown under the bus if anything goes wrong.

I don't know anything about the shooting and I've not seen any video footage so I've no idea what the circumstances are here, but police shootings are rare in the UK.
 

Big_Zucchini

Well-Known Member
What do you do when you need soldiers but people are running away from the army?
  1. Incentivize the hell out of it (long term, slow increases).
  2. Mandatory conscription.
  3. Nationalism.

To the outside observer - the UK, as well as other western nations, appear compromised from inside due to uncontrolled immigration, unchecked spreading of "hostile" ideologies, and the belief that security is "toxic". I've heard about plans to reinstate mandatory conscription. If true, that would be great. Military service for all is a great way to shape the young generation with values like discipline, responsibility, and teach them some practical skills - some of which might be applicable later on as part of their profession, essentially giving them free training.

What do you guys think? What approach will they take?
 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
To the outside observer - the UK, as well as other western nations, appear compromised from inside due to uncontrolled immigration, unchecked spreading of "hostile" ideologies, and the belief that security is "toxic".
Absolutely applies to Canada

I've heard about plans to reinstate mandatory conscription.
I doubt any political party here would propose this albeit the idea has merit. There could be public support for some kind of national service and military service could be part of this if there was an extra incentive to select this option.
 

Hone C

Active Member
What do you guys think? What approach will they take?
Although being discussed, in my opinion there's virtually no chance of conscription being introduced. The British armed forces have historically been volunteers, even in the First World War conscription wasn't introduced until 1916. The Armed Forces don't want it, and PM Rishi Sunak has already dismissed it. Any political party suggesting conscription would likely be crucified in the media and polls, and there would be the very real possibility of civil disobedience in the event of it being introduced.


The British are likely to carry on trying to muddle through, re-orbating units to lower manning levels and substituting technology for manpower. Not sure there's much in the budget for additional financial incentives, but there are definite efforts already underway to improve the offer.
 
Top