Next Generation MBT Discussion and Concepts

Terran

Well-Known Member
Okay, but here is the thing @Big_Zucchuni, this statement
For the IDF specifically, an IFV, APC, and maneuver support vehicles (ARV, CEV, CP, GP etc) are more relevant, and the first planned date was 2027 for fielding first units (may have been unofficially pushed to 2029), while an MBT could come much later.
Whether MBT or IFV or anything else, the systems' architecture is the same, so they can show whatever platform they want.
Carmel is, after all, just a tech demonstrator program, not a full fledged AFV, and part of the program is also the Barak MBT which is a Merkava 4 modernization due to enter service by the end of this year or early 2023.

The video indeed shows a third person sometimes, but it's just a third person, not an infantry section, and he will also occassionally exist on MBTs.
The third person is not part of the crew, but could be a dedicated systems operator, a fires officer, or a platoon/company commander.

It's also important to understand that IAI is just presenting tech on some notional platform. The IDF will supply an independently developed platform, but core pieces like automotives are likely to be imported, like the Merkava 4 for example uses a German power pack.
seems to contradict this one.
I don't think you quite understand the current trajectory.
Yes, of the projects we could eyeball in the last 3 years, the Carmel appears to be the only one that incorporates deep stealth and hybrid-electric power as integral parts of the vehicle. But that is only because the Carmel is a statement for what's to come in 2030, when the next gen tank is deployed, whereas the AbramsX, KF51 and so on, are supposed to show what can be done TODAY.
And the OMFV? It focuses on low-risk, deliverable platforms today that are modular enough to accept radical changes by 2030 that will not eat into its growth potential.

So worry not, stealth and other "revolutionary" aspects are very much pursued.
You seem to be stating what fits with my rough understanding that the Carmel technology is an overall systems management architecture into which vehicles either new or old could be configured with off the shelf or new components. Rather than a vehicle or said components. So the Carmel isn’t “incorporating Deep stealth or Hybrid electrical as integral”. Because those are being developed independently either in or out of Israel then to be added as modules to the Carmel architecture.
Which sounds more like the next generation of Israeli AFV could actually resemble AbramsX in that they could take an existing base then reconstruct it using newer but high readiness technology around the Systems management of Carmel. Building hypothetical Eltan X, Merkava X and Namer X.
As opposed to a program like the US FCS MCV where in a new vehicle universal chassis was being developed, a systems interface/management architecture like Carmel was being developed, a series of turrets, automatic munitions handling and weapons derived from off the shelf systems. Sensors and fire control was being developed and a brand new APS system. It was a architecture that though not entirely from scratch was certainly tailored to become an all inclusive programs.
 

Big_Zucchini

Well-Known Member
So the Carmel isn’t “incorporating Deep stealth or Hybrid electrical as integral”. Because those are being developed independently either in or out of Israel then to be added as modules to the Carmel architecture.
Which sounds more like the next generation of Israeli AFV could actually resemble AbramsX in that they could take an existing base then reconstruct it using newer but high readiness technology around the Systems management of Carmel. Building hypothetical Eltan X, Merkava X and Namer X.
Carmel is simply a tech demonstration and maturation program whose end goal is to demonstrate and integrate all components needed to create the so called next generation of AFVs, regardless of whether those are ready components or they need to be developed from scratch. The demonstrations we saw, have shown components like digital vehicle architecture, AI-driven decisions, and a capsule that enables operation by 2 crewmen instead of 4.
But these are not the only components of the Carmel program. It also includes capabilities like exporting power, silent watch, multi-spectral stealth, lighter more efficient construction, and even new armaments.
With the earliest date so far for deployment being 2029, there's plenty of time to see the other components develop.
Whether developed locally or imported, they still need to be adapted specifically for IDF vehicles.
 

Big_Zucchini

Well-Known Member
Based and drone-pilled.
South Korea launches K2 improvement program. The model in the Tweet is not of the K2 but I have only stumbled upon it now and it showcases the widespread understanding that top armor is crucial and not an afterthought.
The Merkava series is the only series of tanks that took top protection seriously - in response to experience in south Lebanon. This greatly paid off especially in the current war in Gaza.
Some have applied improvized or semi improvized solutions such as add-on composites on Swedish Leopards or ERA on Soviet tanks. But a proper solution must include top protection that is baked into the design from which top components placement is derived, rather than deriving afforded top protection from available space.

 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
Germany and France have agreed on the development of a new tank. The new MGCS program will incorporate lessons learned from the troubled FCAS program. Time will tell. The program will be open to other partners.

 

SolarisKenzo

Well-Known Member
Italy and France sign an agreement on MGCS and ground defence industry, soon a deal with Germany too.


 

Terran

Well-Known Member
So Eurosatory just passed and three MBT models/demonstrators were on hand.

The three vehicle concepts on hand seem to be based on the premise that MGCS is likely to take long enough for a bridge vehicle option to be needed a time frame closer toSo what was on display was a lot like AbramsX from a few years back in the U.S. Turret packages to bridge that gap.

Rheinmetall had two versions of KF51.

If MGCS drags out, Rheinmetall pitches Concept Unmanned Turret as near-term alternative - Breaking Defense
KF51 U is stated to have an alternative main cannon in the form of a 120mm with a 25 round automatic loader
And the big and proud bigger sibling the KF51 Evo.
This seems like they are pitching just dropping the Panther turret on the Leopard 2 hull for countries so disposed to a fast upgrade. The KF51 has used a Hull for the Leopard 2 since it was built. However Rhinemetall doesn’t make the Leopard 2 so offering it as a total package would be difficult. Why they haven’t launched they own hull and chassis for this is beyond this commentator although I image the prevalence of Leopard 2 hulls maybe part of it.


KNDS though was not to be topped with three vehicles.
Leopard 2 A-RC 3.0
Basically KNDS copied GDLS’s homework. We have an unmanned turret with a 30mm RWS, a NLOS launcher and weight savings. Oh and Trophy APS. Standard L55 gun though

The French side of KNDS rolled out the Leclerc Evolution. With an Ascalon 120mm gun 4 man crew, 30mm RWS.

Finally is the EMBT in its latest iteration with a 140mm gun. This is more or less the test vehicle for MGCS systems based on a leopard 2 hull. With a 20mm coax, a 30mm RWS and a 7.62mg somewhere in the mix.

Also on hand was the Leopard 2A8, an export package of the Black Panther the K2EX, a new model of the K3 concept that looks goofy and an M1A2 Sep 3 Abrams.
 
Top