Russia's New Strategic Arsenal

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #41
The weapons inspectors from the US have already have had access to the Avangard hypersonic missiles of the US. This happened under the New START treaty that bounds both countries to limited weapon inspections with an aim of limiting each other's arsenals. But I wonder how much do they show each other and what level of access they provide on such sensitive installations.

Here are the details of the US inspectors visiting the Avangard missiles: No Surprise: The US has already accessed Russian hypersonic missiles
Dear lord that article is off. I can't help but wonder why they haven't bothered to do even basic research before writing this...

Russia’s deployment of its Avangard hypersonic missiles does not come as a surprise since the US has already had access to them. This state of the art system is the world’s first and the only known hypersonic weapon. It travels at 27 times the speed of sound and is claimed by Russia to be capable of penetrating the US missile shield.
The Avangard is not a missile, it's a maneuvering combat block/glider, mounted on Soviet UR-100UTTH missiles. It's also not the first or the only hypersonic weapon. There's the RS-74, both another hypersonic weapon, actually a hypersonic missile, and deployed sooner. Russia has received a batch of 30 UR-100UTTH ICBMs from Ukraine, that have never been deployed. They have been sitting in storage, and are now being deployed to carry the Avangard. The choice of carrier suggests that there is a strong relationship between the Soviet OKR Holod and the current Avangard.

According to the Russian Defense Ministry, the missiles are capable of carrying nuclear warheads and are able to hit targets anywhere in the world. Though their deployment locations have, understandably, not been revealed.
It's mounted on an ICBM so... that claim isn't particularly far-fetched. And their deployment is the 13th Orenburg Missile Division. So we know where it's been deployed, and since it's silo-mounted I doubt that US intelligence services have missed which silos were loaded with the missiles.

How the US Accessed Russian Hypersonic Missiles?
The US accessed Russian hypersonic missiles under the New START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty). New START is a bilateral agreement between the two countries, aimed at discouraging a nuclear arms race. It was signed in 2010 and allows mutual weapon inspections so that the number of strategic nuclear missile launchers can be reduced.

On 26 November 2019, US inspectors visited Russia and were given a tour of an Avangard facility under the inspection provisions of the New START. The exercise was part of measures to increase transparency in the nuclear programs of the two countries.

The visit of US experts was announced by no less than the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. His ministry stated that the inspection was carried out to keep the treaty “viable and effective”.
Ok, so if I'm understanding this correctly, then what they accessed, as part of the routine inspection, is the facilities where the UR-100UTTHs are deployed. I strongly doubt that they were given a close look at the hypersonic gliders mounted on top of the ICBMs... which means that they all they got to see was much the same thing they would see visiting any other RVSN division armed with UR-100UTTHs...

EDIT: Nevermind intelligence services, here's OSINT on which silos Avangard is deployed in.

Avangard begins combat duty - Blog - Russian strategic nuclear forces
 
Last edited:

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #42
OKR Nudol conducted another launch test, April 15th 2020. The test came after some odd maneuvering of a couple of Russian satellites. What's even more interesting is that the source confirming this test is the US, not Russia.

 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #43
Some updates.

We have another OKR Nudol' test. That's quite a few tests, and I'm curious to see how long before we deploy the system operationally. Note the information on the tests keeps coming from the US, Russia seems to prefer to keep this out of public eye, despite opposite practices in other areas of arms development.


Russian Strategic Missile Forces conducted a massive exercise, with 6 ICBM/SLBM launches, including a volley launch of 4 Bulava SLBMs.

 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #44
Updates.

Testing of the Burevestnik nuclear powered cruise missiles continues.


Testing also continues on BMD missiles.


Flight trials of the Sarmat heavy ICBM were scheduled for this year but it looks like they won't be happening.


A new ICBM, the 15P182 is under development under OKR OsinaRV. It is apparently a Yars follow-on. It's separate from the Yars-M that's under development as an upgrade for the type. A test launch of a new ICBM was done this summer and it may have been Osina, but it also could have been the Sirena, a command missile of the Yars-M type (a next-generation Perimtere/Dead Hand system).


There is some evidence of a new EW system meant for us against satellites. A European Sentinel-1 satellite experienced interference when flying over Russia and it coincided with a transmission spike in the 6 giga-hertz range.

 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
Updates.

Testing of the Burevestnik nuclear powered cruise missiles continues.


Testing also continues on BMD missiles.


Flight trials of the Sarmat heavy ICBM were scheduled for this year but it looks like they won't be happening.


A new ICBM, the 15P182 is under development under OKR OsinaRV. It is apparently a Yars follow-on. It's separate from the Yars-M that's under development as an upgrade for the type. A test launch of a new ICBM was done this summer and it may have been Osina, but it also could have been the Sirena, a command missile of the Yars-M type (a next-generation Perimtere/Dead Hand system).


There is some evidence of a new EW system meant for us against satellites. A European Sentinel-1 satellite experienced interference when flying over Russia and it coincided with a transmission spike in the 6 giga-hertz range.

Im sorry, but what are a "command missile" and "Perimtere/Dead Hand system"?
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #46
Im sorry, but what are a "command missile" and "Perimtere/Dead Hand system"?
Yeah I probably should have explained that. Dead Hand is a western media name for a alleged Soviet doomsday system that would order nuclear forces missiles to launch even if upper leadership is wiped out. It's existence was confirmed in iirc the 1990s and the system is called Perimeter. It consists of two parts; a set of sensors across the country to register signs of nuclear attack, and a set of "command missiles" that are launched within a certain time limit after the sensors register the attack and if no override is provided from central command. The command missile flies over Russia (Soviet) territory and broadcasts launch orders to RVSN and VMF SLBMs to launch their missiles at their preset targets.

 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #47
There are some interesting claims about a new Russian missile system called the S-550. It's a new system type that was originally described as replacing the S-400 but now appears to be more of an S-500 follow-on. It will allegedly serve as BMD, be able to engage targets in orbit, and intercept hypersonic missiles. I would take these claims with a grain of salt. It's entirely possible that the system will be able to do some of these things under some conditions, but it's all quite vague at this time.

 

Capt. Ironpants

Active Member
Apparently, all that stuff we've been sending the Ukrainians may be getting on Putin's nerves and he needed a distraction. He chose today to test that scary new ICBM of theirs. I imagine Saddam would have dubbed it "The Mother of All Missiles":

 
Last edited:

ngatimozart

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Interesting pattern of GPS jamming south of Murmansk, and in parts of Karelen: GPSJam GPS/GNSS Interference Map

Upcoming testing? or something else?
There has been talk of Putin ordering a nuclear forces exercise to happen in the next few days, but that was reported to be occurring near the Ukrainian border. Maybe this is said exercise and wiser heads have prevailed.
 

AbhiDas94

New Member
Russia to test its most feared Yars Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) in an exercise !!! These ICBMs can strike at a range of 15,000km or more and are equipped with MiRV (Multiple Independent Re-entry Vehicle) !!! This is very dangerous...I'm too much scared...don't like everybody to show off these things...


@AbhiDas94 I understand that English may no be your first language, however you should not use emotional terms such as "most feared etc.," about a weapon system of any nation. That speaks to you pushing disinformation or propaganda, both of which are banned from here.

Ngatimozart.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Redshift

Active Member
Russia to test its most feared Yars Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) in an exercise !!! These ICBMs can strike at a range of 15,000km or more and are equipped with MiRV (Multiple Independent Re-entry Vehicle) !!! This is very dangerous...I'm too much scared...don't like everybody to show off these things...

Most feared by who exactly?
 
Most feared by who exactly?
The US fears the RS-24 Yars the most because that ICBM has a MIRV capability unlike the Topol-M from which it is derived, the LGM-30G Minuteman III and forthcoming LGM-35 Sentinel, meaning that it could overwhelm US missile defenses with numerous nuclear warheads. When the R-36M (codenamed Satan) was first deployed, it send shivers down the spine of US generals in charge of managing American ICBM units and ABM units because its heavy throw weight and ability to carry up to 10 MIRVs gave it a capability to overwhelm US missile defenses, prompting the US to develop the LGM-118 Peacekeeper which could carry up to 11-12 MIRVs. The current head of the Strategic Missile Forces, Sergey Karakaev, describes the name Yars as an acronym for "Yadernaya Raketa Sderzhivaniya", which means "Nuclear Deterrence Rocket" in Russian. Hence, the name Yars for the RS-24 seems to have been a logical nomenclatural euphemism for the RS-24 by Russian military officials to emphasize the RS-24's potential capability to overwhelm missile defenses by carrying as many warheads as the R-36M (the Minuteman IIIs in service currently carry only one re-entry vehicle).
 

Redshift

Active Member
The US fears the RS-24 Yars the most because that ICBM has a MIRV capability unlike the Topol-M from which it is derived, the LGM-30G Minuteman III and forthcoming LGM-35 Sentinel, meaning that it could overwhelm US missile defenses with numerous nuclear warheads. When the R-36M (codenamed Satan) was first deployed, it send shivers down the spine of US generals in charge of managing American ICBM units and ABM units because its heavy throw weight and ability to carry up to 10 MIRVs gave it a capability to overwhelm US missile defenses, prompting the US to develop the LGM-118 Peacekeeper which could carry up to 11-12 MIRVs. The current head of the Strategic Missile Forces, Sergey Karakaev, describes the name Yars as an acronym for "Yadernaya Raketa Sderzhivaniya", which means "Nuclear Deterrence Rocket" in Russian. Hence, the name Yars for the RS-24 seems to have been a logical nomenclatural euphemism for the RS-24 by Russian military officials to emphasize the RS-24's potential capability to overwhelm missile defenses by carrying as many warheads as the R-36M (the Minuteman IIIs in service currently carry only one re-entry vehicle).
And all of the trident missiles are MIRV as were the Posidon and Polaris missiles before them.
 
And all of the trident missiles are MIRV as were the Posidon and Polaris missiles before them.
If the Trident II carries MIRVs like previous American SLBMs, does it retain its MIRV capability in contrast to the LGM-30G nowadays carrying a single warhead due to the parameters of New START Treaty?

I also forgot to mention that the RS-28 Sarmat (nicknamed "Satan II" for "Son of Satan") is now in operational service, and it carries as many MIRVs as the R-36M which it will replace in operational service. Although the silos from which it is designed to operate are potentially vulnerable to nuclear airstrikes, the RS-28 packs a nuclear wallop slightly greater than that of the Yars and could wreak more devastation to US missile defense systems and airfields than the RS-24.

 

Redshift

Active Member
If the Trident II carries MIRVs like previous American SLBMs, does it retain its MIRV capability in contrast to the LGM-30G nowadays carrying a single warhead due to the parameters of New START Treaty?

I also forgot to mention that the RS-28 Sarmat (nicknamed "Satan II" for "Son of Satan") is now in operational service, and it carries as many MIRVs as the R-36M which it will replace in operational service. Although the silos from which it is designed to operate are potentially vulnerable to nuclear airstrikes, the RS-28 packs a nuclear wallop slightly greater than that of the Yars and could wreak more devastation to US missile defense systems and airfields than the RS-24.

Trident can carry up to 12 warheads and decoys per missile, I can't tell you how many are routinely deployed by the USA other they reduced the missile couldn't from 24 to 20 under START. THe UK has committed to reducing the missiles and warheads routinely carried to 8 and 40 down from the initial 16 and current 8 missiles per Vanguard SSBN.
 

Redshift

Active Member
Trident can carry up to 12 warheads and decoys per missile, I can't tell you how many are routinely deployed by the USA other they reduced the missile couldn't from 24 to 20 under START. THe UK has committed to reducing the missiles and warheads routinely carried to 8 and 40 down from the initial 16 and current 12 missiles per Vanguard SSBN.
 
Top