No need for the attitude. Not everyone keeps uptodate on everything right across the board. I for instance wasn't aware of it until I saw the post.Mate, are you trolling or have you been living in a cave for the last 12 months? This isn't news, it was widely reported months ago with the defence review.
Even the article you posted say she'd been laid up and stripped of useful parts for years. So if anything, this is good news because it means money will no longer be wasted keeping a mostly useless hulk floating.
Mate, say it to the publisher. ukdefencejournal not to me. Please take a pill to relax yourself . Thanks.Mate, are you trolling or have you been living in a cave for the last 12 months? This isn't news, it was widely reported months ago with the defence review.
Even the article you posted say she'd been laid up and stripped of useful parts for years. So if anything, this is good news because it means money will no longer be wasted keeping a mostly useless hulk floating.
...& in more news about the size & shape of the Royal Navy....
HMS Blyth & Ramsey paid off....
Royal Navy website - News section
THIS, may be the reason...One way to solve the personnel shortages I guess - have less ships?
I don't even think we have an MCM replacement on the horizon either.
That does seem to be the current plan.
France bought a similar system (not the same company) a while ago.THIS, may be the reason...
Autonomous Mine hunters
That does seem to be the current plan.
Does also seem to mean additional taskings for the RN frigates. Those much touted "mission bays" are going to filled with so much stuff their flexibility is going to be a bit limited, IMO.
Unmanned Systems Set to Replace All Royal Navy Mine Warfare Vessels
The UKs sweeping integrated defense review proposes deep changes to the structure of the nations arm...www.maritime-executive.com
Yeah, why don't you get back with me when there is an actual "Type 32 Frigate" RN procurement program. Because there isn't one now that I am aware of. As of three months ago wasn't Type 32 still in the "determining the operational concept of the program" phase?Isn’t operating Autonomous Systems going to be the job of the Type 32 Frigates?Royal Navy’s future Type 32 frigate to be ‘platform for autonomous systems'
More details have emerged today about the Royal Navy’s future Type 32 Frigate, with the UK’s Minister for Defence Procurement Jeremy Quinn writing that the ships will be a platform for autonomous systems.www.naval-technology.com
Well as you said the RN is not going to have enough Frigates to be able to use them in the MCMV role as well as the more traditional Escort roles, yes i was probably a bit premature in saying going to be,Yeah, why don't you get back with me when there is an actual "Type 32 Frigate" RN procurement program. Because there isn't one now that I am aware of. As of three months ago wasn't Type 32 still in the "determining the operational concept of the program" phase?
Edit:
This may come across with a bit more bite than was intended. Sometimes my smartass from NYC sarcastic response mode kicks in dialed all the way up to "11"
It gets back to the original post concerning the fact that the RN is getting rid of the Sandown Class and replacing it with Autonomous systems but they need a Mothership to be truly effective, the only Vessel announced so far under any sort of development for the RN for operating Autonomous systems are the Frigates. Yes they may be able to use the OPVs but they only have 8.Plus, you don’t waste a frigate on lane clearance and similar MCM, nor do you take it close enough in shore to do the job for over the beach ops, or at least you don’t if you’re sensible.
You are essentially describing the future Belgian/Netherlands MCM mothershipI rather suspect the intent with T32 is for surveillance in offshore areas in such things as ASW; and possibly control of minimum or un manned weapons platforms as for the USN concept. They really need to invest in a smallish platform with only self defence armament and the capacity to go inshore for the MCM task, a bit like the RAN is looking to do with a similar concept and using the follow on 8 Arafuras.
Yeah, why don't you get back with me when there is an actual "Type 32 Frigate" RN procurement program. Because there isn't one now that I am aware of. As of three months ago wasn't Type 32 still in the "determining the operational concept of the program" phase?
Edit:
This may come across with a bit more bite than was intended. Sometimes my smartass from NYC sarcastic response mode kicks in dialed all the way up to "11"
A better fantasy would be more T26s.Fair commentary I feel - Type 32 is a placeholder - and I already suspect it'd just be a batch 2 Type31 order in all but name. I may be wrong however
I'm sure i've seen somewhere, possibly even within this thread or a link on one of the pages since the beginning of July, that 2022 will be the EARLIEST that any decision will be made on Batch 2, Type 26...A better fantasy would be more T26s.