I have a figure of 88 but not sure if that’s upgrading what we have plus 29 new builds or new vehicles.Do we know how many of these new SEP v. 3 tanks we will be receiving? Will it just be a one for one replacement?
I have a figure of 88 but not sure if that’s upgrading what we have plus 29 new builds or new vehicles.Do we know how many of these new SEP v. 3 tanks we will be receiving? Will it just be a one for one replacement?
Do we know how many of these new SEP v. 3 tanks we will be receiving? Will it just be a one for one replacement?
Read the article in the link provided in the July issue of DTR it covers everything about the proposed upgrade.There you go, great timing, page 46 has the intended M-1, ABV and JAB upgrade all laid out. Phase 2 Govt approval due for approval sept 2021, including increasing the fleet to 88 Tanks likely to be M-1A2 (SEPv3) as well as a combined ABV/JAB fleet of 32 Vehicles based on the M-1 Chasis.Home - Defence Technology Review
IN THIS ISSUE ACCESS CURRENT ISSUE NEWS Land 400 Phase 3 latest The current status of the Australian Army’s Land 400 Phase 3 project and what the next few months may hold. Read the full article NEWS MRH-90 woes continue With poor rates of effort and climbing costs the MRH-90 trooplift helicopter...dtrmagazine.com
The specific section you are referring noting the total of 88.Read the article in the link provided in the July issue of DTR it covers everything about the proposed upgrade.
The Electronic version of DTR is free all you have to do is register and you are sent a link each month to the latest edition.
John, I finally got around to reading the paper. Thanks for posting. It is a post mortem study of brains collected at autopsy and highlights the risks of repetitive minor head injury from 'concussion' like events. There is nothing surprising here, these risks have been recognised in contacts sports (NFL, AFL, boxing etc) for a the last couple of decades, the extreme end of the spectrum has been known for a long time as 'punch drunk', that occurred in boxers. They seem to be a bit out of date, I was a bit disappointed when they said:From the article, " Because these asymptomatic mTBIs are difficult to assess, it is likely that DTI and fMRI (functional MRI) will become useful tools to guide the prognosis and management of these injuries moving forward". Also from the article, "Concussion and subconcussive injury are associated with microstructural changes in the white matter and alterations in fiber tract integrity that are detectable with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and susceptibility weighted imaging but are not evident on conventional structural imaging studies such as computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)" thus CT scans wouldn't be useful.
DTI, fMRI, and PET apparently are useful for assessment of mTBI. PET imaging is relatively expensive compared to other imaging techniques as a cyclotron is needed for F-18 production. Sadly, there isn't a lot that can be done to treat TBI other than to restrict further exposure to any activities that cause TBI.
FYI: NZ uses M6C-640T Light MortarWere others aware that the Australian Army operates 60mm mortars?
I certainly wasn't.
Australian and NZ Defender has an article stating they are used by Special Forces (SASR/2 Commando) and a roll out to 2RAR has begun.
With a role out to other non special forces units possible after 2RAR assesses them.
The 60mm system used is the M224A1 as used by the USMC.
Article is Paywall protected.
Australian & NZ Defender Australia's leading defence news and military history reporting
www.australiandefender.com.au
Maybe someone accidentally left out a comma or two. "Tank Replacement, Evaluation and Design . . "?Hmm... "Tank Replacement Evaluation and Design ($8 – $11.9b) "
$8-11B seems rather pricey for evaluating replacement options for the M1 (I mean, the proces of considering options and maybe leasing a few tanks off allies for evaluation purpoes might be a few $100M tops...). So, two possibilities spring to mind, either "evaluation and design" is wrong/very poorly worded and it's actually that full M1 replacement program costs, or, the inclusion of "design" is awfully suspicious and someone somewhere in the government/bowls of the public service wants Australia to do more than select a new tank off the rack...
I posted the articles on the 24th and 25th on brain injuries to military personnel the physical effects and behavioral effects to raise some awareness or discussion , my query was directed at ongoing screening processes for people with this trauma still alive that would prevent them from further injuryJohn, I finally got around to reading the paper. Thanks for posting. It is a post mortem study of brains collected at autopsy and highlights the risks of repetitive minor head injury from 'concussion' like events. There is nothing surprising here, these risks have been recognised in contacts sports (NFL, AFL, boxing etc) for a the last couple of decades, the extreme end of the spectrum has been known for a long time as 'punch drunk', that occurred in boxers. They seem to be a bit out of date, I was a bit disappointed when they said:
"The incidence and prevalence of chronic traumatic encephalopathy and the genetic risk factors critical to its development are currently unknown."
The last bit is rubbish. A big genetic risk is the presence of apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele, which is also the most common genetic risk factor for dementia. It is predictive of a a worse outcome in models of traumatic brain injury and in particular has a very high correlation with folks who develop Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE). Because it is currently untreatable there has discussion in sports medicine circles of using to assess risk and it may come that sports people who engage in contacts sports could be counselled to change to tiddily winks if they have the APOE ε4 allele. There may be ways using standard MRI to diagnose it in the future using clever measurements of the size of certain bits of the brain, it would certainly help work out incidence and prevalence.
Sorry.I posted the articles on the 24th and 25th on brain injuries to military personnel the physical effects and behavioral effects to raise some awareness or discussion , my query was directed at ongoing screening processes for people with this trauma still alive that would prevent them from further injury
Don't The current Australian Artillery Regiments have 12 guns each?The SPH req is for 2 Regt worth so i would say that yes it will be more than 30. The other one is a MRL system, probably HIMARS but the ROK K-239 could also be in the running. The K-9 order still hasn’t gone to Cabinet yet, so we may see a tweaking of numbers there, maybe 30+ options. I think we will have to wait on the SPH order is announced before we will know the fate of the 777s.
Is it certain that protected mobile fires means SPGs ?
Could a batch of 120mm self propelled mortars also be considered?
I know we have a limited size army but the numbers seem so small. Assuming there was an attack that we had to defend on the mainland... It’s fictitious right now but the assumption by the gov is that someone is building up for something...say Port Headland had a landing and Curtin and Learmont rendered inoperable ... how would 30 SPH be of any use? They are not going to be used against anyone in a ship I imagine ....Don't The current Australian Artillery Regiments have 12 guns each?
Three batteries each with 4 X M777s.
So a buy of 30 SPHs would already be enough to equip two Regiments of 12 guns each with 6 left for training.
Maybe a few more than 30 to allow for servicing etc but not many.
Unless a SPH Regiment is going to be differently equipped to the current Australian Artillery regiments?
Not to mention such a landing would be within striking range from Australian forces via land, air, and sea. As well as having been within Australian sensor coverage for 1000's of km. Depending on how unpleasant Australian forces wished to be, Australian citizens could have been withdrawn/evacuated ahead of the hostile landing force being permitted to land. Then once landed, have their very long logistical tail routinely attacked and cut or outright destroyed, leaving the local flora and fauna for the landed force to deal with.If Australian SPGs are no use against an enemy landing at Port Headland, we can be equally sure that anything the enemy landed is equally useless.
The textbook response to an enemy landing at Port Headland would be to do absolutely nothing and wait for them to surrender when they realise they are thousands of kilometres away from anything of importance.
Don't The current Australian Artillery Regiments have 12 guns each?
Three batteries each with 4 X M777s.
So a buy of 30 SPHs would already be enough to equip two Regiments of 12 guns each with 6 left for training.
Maybe a few more than 30 to allow for servicing etc but not many.
Unless a SPH Regiment is going to be differently equipped to the current Australian Artillery regiments?