I did a search and didn't see a this topic, so I thought I'd ask.
How did 8 become the defacto number of anti ship missiles to put on warships.
eg The Arleigh Burke has 96 mk 41 VLS, but only 8 harpoons. Every European frigate/destroyer I've seen also has 8.
I understand that the VLS are used for many defensive and land attack missiles, but still, why 8 ASM's?
Why not 4? Or even better, why not 24/40/80 ASM's?
I suspect someone is going to say that it's not necessary during peacetime to carry more, but even then, how did 8 become the standard for peacetime military ships?
I do know that ESSM and SM family missiles can be used as anti ship missiles in a secondary role, but that's a recent conversion, and they're too expensive to use to do that regularly. So let's stick to dedicated anti ship missiles
How did 8 become the defacto number of anti ship missiles to put on warships.
eg The Arleigh Burke has 96 mk 41 VLS, but only 8 harpoons. Every European frigate/destroyer I've seen also has 8.
I understand that the VLS are used for many defensive and land attack missiles, but still, why 8 ASM's?
Why not 4? Or even better, why not 24/40/80 ASM's?
I suspect someone is going to say that it's not necessary during peacetime to carry more, but even then, how did 8 become the standard for peacetime military ships?
I do know that ESSM and SM family missiles can be used as anti ship missiles in a secondary role, but that's a recent conversion, and they're too expensive to use to do that regularly. So let's stick to dedicated anti ship missiles