t68
Well-Known Member
US Sec Def has given NATO members the hard word about defence spending with the members being told to start increasing their defence spending by years end in order to meet the 2% GDP defence spending requirement.
A National Interest article, The 2 Percent NATO Benchmark Is a Red Herring, discusses that the 2% GDP expenditure could be problematic for the US because the other nations may spend domestically on their own defence industries and drift from commonality with US systems, reducing interoperability. The second argument is that the other countries supporting their own defence industries will mean less sales for US companies.
However, both articles point to the fact that the US is starting to put the hard word on allies and friends to increase defence spending by the end of the year with 2% GDP being eventual goal. How Wellington reacts to this will be interesting because ultimately Trump could excluded them from 5EYES if they don't play ball and 5EYES is extremely important to NZ security; more important than anything else.
Don't think you kiwis have to really wory about it, it's more NATO and Asian countries. But if it had an effect on Wellington thinking all well and good.
It would be an interesting exercise on what NZDF cold achieve with constant $$