I would think so. By all accounts the Warthogs are very good at making life difficult for insurgents.Presumably the target would be the Middle East for those?
I would think so. By all accounts the Warthogs are very good at making life difficult for insurgents.Presumably the target would be the Middle East for those?
WE'LL TAKE 60!!.....Sorry got ahead of myself. Was wondering why it was budget day today but it all makes sense now. Govt wants to get into the serious warfighting business and get all Hogged up. Next will be Arleigh Burkes and M1A2 and some Paladin's. hmmmmm, What was it on those Tui billboards?I would think so. By all accounts the Warthogs are very good at making life difficult for insurgents.
And we will supply the aircraft, a reverse Skyhawk deal!!and A10's are relevant to RNZAF because....
I know that they are good at what they do, but they are old and costly to maintain and don't really fit in with what we do.
Plus they have short legs. look at where we sit in the world.
England is getting new aircraft carriers, maybe we could place an order.
Sorry I was being facetious there. They aren't what even I would call a match to our requirements however they are alot better than what we have now.and A10's are relevant to RNZAF because....
I know that they are good at what they do, but they are old and costly to maintain and don't really fit in with what we do.
Plus they have short legs. look at where we sit in the world.
England is getting new aircraft carriers, maybe we could place an order.
They come with a free prophylactic too. Could race them in the hanger space.And we will supply the aircraft, a reverse Skyhawk deal!!
England?England is getting new aircraft carriers, maybe we could place an order.
I hear they got a sweetheart deal after Bavaria reneged, remembering they didn't have a coastline.In other news, Prussia is getting four F125 Brandenburg class frigates.
England?
England does not have any armed forces, let alone a navy. It isn't even an administrative area, let alone an independent country. I live in England, & I think I'd have noticed if we'd suddenly got our own navy.
In other news, Prussia is getting four F125 Brandenburg class frigates.
RN. Always was. The RN belongs to the Sovereign who historically was English.Interesting way to put it never really thought of it that way.
Hypotheticaly speaking if England was to become independant what sort of armed forces could you afford?
Certantly in terms of GDP and population in theory you could still be somewhat larger than the RAN/RNZN combined.
Would you be REN or still RN?
The problem being on board a Prussian naval vessel is that they expect you to wear a pickelhaube, jackboots and goose step all the time. Bit mean on the poor off duty watchkeepers below trying to sleep Mind you the beer would be good.England?
England does not have any armed forces, let alone a navy. It isn't even an administrative area, let alone an independent country. I live in England, & I think I'd have noticed if we'd suddenly got our own navy.
In other news, Prussia is getting four F125 Brandenburg class frigates.
Yep, all our monarchs have been English. Sven Forkbeard, his son Cnut the Great, & his son Harold the 1st - who may have had an English mother, unlike his half-brother Hardacnut, who followed him. Then there was William the Bastard, his 2nd son William Rufus, & then the 3rd son Henry 1 - who was, at least born in England, unlike either of his parents. Back to entirely foreign with Stephen. But by 200 years later, they wer so English they even spoke it. So only 250 years of French-speaking monarchs.RN. Always was. The RN belongs to the Sovereign who historically was English.
You've won the monthly "best" post award, where's the like button :lol3Yep, all our monarchs have been English. Sven Forkbeard, his son Cnut the Great, & his son Harold the 1st - who may have had an English mother, unlike his half-brother Hardacnut, who followed him. Then there was William the Bastard, his 2nd son William Rufus, & then the 3rd son Henry 1 - who was, at least born in England, unlike either of his parents. Back to entirely foreign with Stephen. But by 200 years later, they wer so English they even spoke it. So only 250 years of French-speaking monarchs.
Pretty English for a while after that, although a lot of 'em married abroad, & there was Philip's brief reign alongside Mary, then along come the Scottish (& French - James I & VI was 3/4 French) Stuarts. Charles I was born in Scotland to James I/VI & a Danish queen, his sons Charles II & James II were at least born in England though their mother was French, & then we had the Dutch William III. George I & II were entirely German & didn't even speak English well. At least George III did, though his queen never lost her German accent. His granddaughter Victoria was born & raised here, but all her ancestors for 5 generations were German - & she married another one.
What was that about the monarch being English? :rolling
That reminds me of an episode of Black Adder Goes Fourth where he is interrogating Captain Darling as to whether he is a German spy, Darling claims to be as English as the King so Black Adder recites George Vs lineage, including the fact he is the Kaisers' cousin.:rollingYep, all our monarchs have been English. Sven Forkbeard, his son Cnut the Great, & his son Harold the 1st - who may have had an English mother, unlike his half-brother Hardacnut, who followed him. Then there was William the Bastard, his 2nd son William Rufus, & then the 3rd son Henry 1 - who was, at least born in England, unlike either of his parents. Back to entirely foreign with Stephen. But by 200 years later, they wer so English they even spoke it. So only 250 years of French-speaking monarchs.
Pretty English for a while after that, although a lot of 'em married abroad, & there was Philip's brief reign alongside Mary, then along come the Scottish (& French - James I & VI was 3/4 French) Stuarts. Charles I was born in Scotland to James I/VI & a Danish queen, his sons Charles II & James II were at least born in England though their mother was French, & then we had the Dutch William III. George I & II were entirely German & didn't even speak English well. At least George III did, though his queen never lost her German accent. His granddaughter Victoria was born & raised here, but all her ancestors for 5 generations were German - & she married another one.
What was that about the monarch being English? :rolling
Yes. And the name Mountbatten is the English translation of Battenberg.I recall reading somewhere that the Royals changed their name from Battenberg to Windsor during WW1 because of the anti-German feeling in Britain during that period.
No, it changed from Saxe-Coburg-Gotha to Windsor. The Battenbergs were another lot, though Prince Philip's mother was one, & he adopted her family name (Mountbatten, by the time he was born) in place of the one he got from his father - Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg.I recall reading somewhere that the Royals changed their name from Battenberg to Windsor during WW1 because of the anti-German feeling in Britain during that period.
I stand corrected, thank you. Nevertheless we have all wandered fftopicNo, it changed from Saxe-Coburg-Gotha to Windsor. The Battenbergs were another lot, though Prince Philip's mother was one, & he adopted her family name (Mountbatten, by the time he was born) in place of the one he got from his father - Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg.