Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates

Status
Not open for further replies.

StevoJH

The Bunker Group
doing some scribbles on a map, you could quite easily fit 2 finger wharfs (both 25m wide with 200m open water) off the east side of GI without impeding Elizabeth Bay too much, would give 4 new berths all capable of handling an LHD. but would also require finding a new place for all the residents of the boat compound.
Is that Marina part of the Naval base?
 

ASSAIL

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
Is that Marina part of the Naval base?
Yes, its the small boat compound. It used to belong to the Queens Harbour Master/Dep of Navy along with all the boats but I guess its all now part of DMS.
Small boats, tugs, work boats, Admirals Barge, water lighters, stores lighters etc etc.
 

t68

Well-Known Member
Abe came up with a suggestion a while ago, hand FBE over to the state government for an overseas passenger terminal and use Charles Kingsford Smith airport as a joint RAN/RAAF base and enlarge the new proposed Sydney International airport so we only need one super airport.

It’s expensive and it would create a large work stimulus for the NSW economy also you could use part of the present terminal for freight if desired(additional income stream) ,RAAF Richmond could in theory close and move to the new FBE as could HMAS Albatross ships and associated aircraft in the one location.

I think abe’s idea has a lot of merit for both defence and tourism NSW whilst expensive it solves three problems at once and theirs even enough space for a golf course for the RAAF to keep up appearances
 

ausklr76

New Member
Abe came up with a suggestion a while ago, hand FBE over to the state government for an overseas passenger terminal and use Charles Kingsford Smith airport as a joint RAN/RAAF base and enlarge the new proposed Sydney International airport so we only need one super airport.

It’s expensive and it would create a large work stimulus for the NSW economy also you could use part of the present terminal for freight if desired(additional income stream) ,RAAF Richmond could in theory close and move to the new FBE as could HMAS Albatross ships and associated aircraft in the one location.

I think abe’s idea has a lot of merit for both defence and tourism NSW whilst expensive it solves three problems at once and theirs even enough space for a golf course for the RAAF to keep up appearances
Lets get real and move FBE out of sydney completely, maybe down to Jervis bay or up to Brisbane. Both places have an abundance of room. Sure Sydney harbour is beautiful and it is pretty to see the ships sailing through the heads but lets get past aesthetic or historical hang-ups and move into the future. The land surrounding port jackson is worth a-squillion and ever since its conception FBE has been feeling the squeeze. The navy needs a safe secure base that doesnt have neighbours overlooking it and can make as much noise and lighting as is operationally needed.
 

t68

Well-Known Member
Lets get real and move FBE out of sydney completely, maybe down to Jervis bay or up to Brisbane.
From memory there was a plan at one stage but something to do with environment made it a no go, something to do with a frog or seaweed perhaps I can’t remember what it was.


Sure Sydney harbour is beautiful and it is pretty to see the ships sailing through the heads but lets get past aesthetic or historical hang-ups and move into the future. The land surrounding port jackson is worth a-squillion and ever since its conception FBE has been feeling the squeeze.

That’s why people like Sydney harbor it was founded on being a working harbour and why Abrahams suggestion was to turn FBE into an overseas passenger terminal along with its café and restaurant’s and etcetera



The navy needs a safe secure base that doesnt have neighbours overlooking it and can make as much noise and lighting as is operationally needed.
Yep and that’s what Mascot provides along with its own airport and wharfs operating next to port botany docks. If anything those living adjacent to the airport will have a decrease in airport noise as the military will not have the current amount of flights arriving and departing.

by leave it in Sydney those in the service what a lifestyle too, moving too many posting out of the major capitals just makes it harder to keep people long term.
 

John Newman

The Bunker Group
Abe came up with a suggestion a while ago, hand FBE over to the state government for an overseas passenger terminal and use Charles Kingsford Smith airport as a joint RAN/RAAF base and enlarge the new proposed Sydney International airport so we only need one super airport.

It’s expensive and it would create a large work stimulus for the NSW economy also you could use part of the present terminal for freight if desired(additional income stream) ,RAAF Richmond could in theory close and move to the new FBE as could HMAS Albatross ships and associated aircraft in the one location.

I think abe’s idea has a lot of merit for both defence and tourism NSW whilst expensive it solves three problems at once and theirs even enough space for a golf course for the RAAF to keep up appearances
Even if the idea of consolidating the units from FBE, Richmond and Nowra to Botany Bay / KSA has merit, the reality is it will never happen.

There are way too many Governments, interest groups, etc, involved for a decision to be made, how long has the discussion for the location of a second Sydney Airport been going on? 20, 30 years? more? And on it goes, everybody wants it, but not in their backyard of course.

That plan all depends on a second airport being operational first. By the time a site is eventually chosen (and all parties agree on too), designs are selected and construction is completed, I reckon by then the 'new' LHD's will be the 'old' LHD's and be ready for retirement!

Personally I'd like to see the Navy stay in Sydney Harbour at FBE, its about the only part of the 'working' harbour that Sydney Harbour once was.


So what's the solution, or at least a solution for the medium term?

As much as the Hammer Head Crane is an icon of the Sydney Harbour skyline, its time has come, and gone too. Maybe they could relocate at least the 'Hammer Head' section to, say for example, Cockatoo Island, I reckon that would be a fitting location, especially with the naval heritage of Cockatoo Island too.

As to expanding FBE (looking at the diagrams in the report), and keeping in mind that the base should continue to be as 'fully' operational as possible too while undergoing the extensions, I'd do it in two phases.

Firstly add wharf space to the unused (or under used) East side, such as the finger wharfs (as in Fig 4-6).

Once that is done and open for use, I would also like to see work on the west side, (as in Fig 4-5), the extension or 'squaring off' of the East Dock Wharf and the Cruiser Wharf.

Doing those three things should result in far more useful space for the Navy and also allow use by the largest of the cruise boats that visit Sydney in Summer (the rest of the cruise ships can use Circular Quay and also the new cruise terminal near Balmain too.

Anyway, that's my opinion for what its worth!
 

aussienscale

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
Clover Moore would be over the moon to get her hands on FBE for cruise ships thinking it would be a huge financial windfall for Sydney. Only problem for her is that the forecast numbers of international ships per year compared to what the Navy brings into the Sydney economy every year leaves a shortfall of Billions, that's why QLD would love to have a new Fleet Base on Brisbane River :)

Jervis Bay does not have the public and economic infrastructure to handle Fleet Base, and who would really want to live down there anyway ? I don't see it doing too much for retention issues and recruitment.

And I certainly can't see a new international airport for Sydney anywhere in the new century, let alone then taking over Kingsford Smith and replacing jumbo's with fast jets and C17's.

The purpose built finger wharf to the East looks like a good option for the LHD's, something similar to what Spain built in Rota for the JC1, but Potts Point and Elizabeth Bay residents would be up in arms on that one !! Along with the changes to the East Dock Wharf and the Cruiser Wharf.

Barring that, a new FB is the only option, and QLD gets my vote for that :) IIRC Abe posted some time ago that the cost of a new FB purpose built in Brisbane River was in the order of $32b ?

Cheers
 

t68

Well-Known Member
Barring that, a new FB is the only option, and QLD gets my vote for that :) IIRC Abe posted some time ago that the cost of a new FB purpose built in Brisbane River was in the order of $32b ?

Cheers
Well that’s cheaper than the NBN and probably have more benefits to the economy.

Well Queensland at least.:rolleyes:


Edit
Wasn’t that the post some time ago that the Brisbane River would be no good for sub as was too far to deep water or something along those lines?


Wonder when the greens are going to pick this up,

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jul/21/bombs-dropped-great-barrier-reef
 

alexsa

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Clover Moore would be over the moon to get her hands on FBE for cruise ships thinking it would be a huge financial windfall for Sydney. Only problem for her is that the forecast numbers of international ships per year compared to what the Navy brings into the Sydney economy every year leaves a shortfall of Billions, that's why QLD would love to have a new Fleet Base on Brisbane River :)

Jervis Bay does not have the public and economic infrastructure to handle Fleet Base, and who would really want to live down there anyway ? I don't see it doing too much for retention issues and recruitment.

And I certainly can't see a new international airport for Sydney anywhere in the new century, let alone then taking over Kingsford Smith and replacing jumbo's with fast jets and C17's.

The purpose built finger wharf to the East looks like a good option for the LHD's, something similar to what Spain built in Rota for the JC1, but Potts Point and Elizabeth Bay residents would be up in arms on that one !! Along with the changes to the East Dock Wharf and the Cruiser Wharf.

Barring that, a new FB is the only option, and QLD gets my vote for that :) IIRC Abe posted some time ago that the cost of a new FB purpose built in Brisbane River was in the order of $32b ?

Cheers
Having spoken to one individual involved in killing off the ammunition storage/wharf idea in JB I don't think there is a snow balls hope in hell of getting that one up. Politicians buckled once under this arguement and I don't see them trying again.


To be honest I see less future in the KSA idea as you wouel need to buy and compensate Sydney Airport Corp for the loss of their investment. Given they claim KSA can fill Sydney needs without a second airport (I am not saying their argument is valid) this could be tricky and bloody expensive.


I like GI as it give the poor bloody sailor a base that is at least close to something. I honestly beleive the cost of moving it is just not worth it.
 

alexsa

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Yeah, those poor sailors with bases in Sydney and Perth...
If they move FBE to JB there won't be much about. The problem is you have to move everything and that includes all the accomodation which carries quite a cost.


I have a lot of sympathy for the Army who have some pretty isolated bases and I suspect Tindal is not a riot of fun either.
 

ausklr76

New Member
If they move FBE to JB there won't be much about. The problem is you have to move everything and that includes all the accomodation which carries quite a cost.


I have a lot of sympathy for the Army who have some pretty isolated bases and I suspect Tindal is not a riot of fun either.
Sounds like Brisbane is the answer then?? More than enough space in the river and vacant land to build accommodation.
 

aussienscale

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
Well that’s cheaper than the NBN and probably have more benefits to the economy.

Well Queensland at least.:rolleyes:


Edit
Wasn’t that the post some time ago that the Brisbane River would be no good for sub as was too far to deep water or something along those lines?


Wonder when the greens are going to pick this up,

Bombs dropped on Great Barrier Reef marine park | Environment | guardian.co.uk
I think that subject of the subs came up around the same time as Rudd's subs and the "what if" we went back to a split East/West sub fleet again, but I don't see subs coming back to the east coast anytime soon. Brisbane river not the best as you don't have quick access to deep water, unlike being able to basically dive off Sydney heads or GI West

Cheers
 

Volkodav

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
I think that subject of the subs came up around the same time as Rudd's subs and the "what if" we went back to a split East/West sub fleet again, but I don't see subs coming back to the east coast anytime soon. Brisbane river not the best as you don't have quick access to deep water, unlike being able to basically dive off Sydney heads or GI West

Cheers
Could always do up Cockatoo Island as a sub base, always thought it was a waste to close the place so why not renovate it and move a number activities from Garden island to there. Nice private and secure.
 

John Newman

The Bunker Group
Could always do up Cockatoo Island as a sub base, always thought it was a waste to close the place so why not renovate it and move a number activities from Garden island to there. Nice private and secure.
The only problem with that idea is that Cockatoo is now under the control of the Sydney Harbour Trust.

And interestingly so are a lot of other former Sydney Harbour / Parramatta River military establishments, HMAS Platapus, Woolwich Dock, the old artillery school at North Head, Chowder Bay.

All that land certainly worth a pretty penny if it was ever to come up for sale and redevelopment!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top